Plan To Eliminate Veterans Compensation
#11
apparently idea is DOA… not gonna happen next year but maybe in future?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/...hier-vets.html
https://www.military.com/daily-news/...hier-vets.html
#12
apparently idea is DOA… not gonna happen next year but maybe in future?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/...hier-vets.html
https://www.military.com/daily-news/...hier-vets.html
#13
true… can’t remember where the report was from but heard on news a few days ago that only 3% of college aged males would consider military service. Death spiral for military readiness.
#14
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,683
Like the CBO said in its report, this is merely a way spending could be reduced. The annual savings would be about equal to NASA’s annual budget.
This is the sort of proposal that is unlikely to get anywhere unless we face a true financial crisis (bond market decides Treasury bonds are a bad bet). I agree with those who say disability benefits are abused. However, I’m not willing to screw over those who are deserving to punish the guilty. This will always be a very emotional issue for those who served, their families, and those who understand the importance of a strong defense.
This is the sort of proposal that is unlikely to get anywhere unless we face a true financial crisis (bond market decides Treasury bonds are a bad bet). I agree with those who say disability benefits are abused. However, I’m not willing to screw over those who are deserving to punish the guilty. This will always be a very emotional issue for those who served, their families, and those who understand the importance of a strong defense.
#15
Not very popular opinion, but I agree with this change. You aren't entitled to disability payments if you can work. The entire point of disability payments is to compensate someone who can't work, or to make up for lost income, or to pay for ongoing medical care. The current system encourages people to make up disabilities so they get a bigger paycheck.
Yes I'm a vet. Yes I receive VA payments.
Yes I'm a vet. Yes I receive VA payments.
I am unlikely to hold a valid medical to 65. Hell 45 is looking dicey right now (out of sick, on FAA leave, about to go to disability when that runs out)
Why? Because the FAA is freaking out over injuries I sustained in the service of the United States. That they previously cleared. But hey, that $1740 a month, I don't need that.
Oh, I'm unable to have children. That's a whopping $107 a month extra "loss of use of reproductive organ" on top of my VA disability. But hey making over $XX a year makes up for that. I'd rather literally have my balls back.
A lot of guys burn their sick to adjust schedules, go golf, whatever. Other non flying jobs I've had I had a PTO bank. Yep. Mine gets used up, often because either the issues I'm on VA Disability for flare up, or because of the special issuance medical I am on, again because of the injuries sustained while flying for the Navy, requires me to self ground for a few different items, for 24-96 hours depending on what it is.
But yeah, lets means test my stuff, while some Fobbit who had a buddy put everything in when he went to medical gets 100%, pays no property tax, reduced personal property tax and gets other niceties. Meanwhile, what I've spent on IVF/Surrogacy could buy a nice house in NYC.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 297
I'm at 70%. I have been through over 30 surgeries thanks to uncle sam.
I am unlikely to hold a valid medical to 65. Hell 45 is looking dicey right now (out of sick, on FAA leave, about to go to disability when that runs out)
Why? Because the FAA is freaking out over injuries I sustained in the service of the United States. That they previously cleared. But hey, that $1740 a month, I don't need that.
Oh, I'm unable to have children. That's a whopping $107 a month extra "loss of use of reproductive organ" on top of my VA disability. But hey making over $XX a year makes up for that. I'd rather literally have my balls back.
A lot of guys burn their sick to adjust schedules, go golf, whatever. Other non flying jobs I've had I had a PTO bank. Yep. Mine gets used up, often because either the issues I'm on VA Disability for flare up, or because of the special issuance medical I am on, again because of the injuries sustained while flying for the Navy, requires me to self ground for a few different items, for 24-96 hours depending on what it is.
But yeah, lets means test my stuff, while some Fobbit who had a buddy put everything in when he went to medical gets 100%, pays no property tax, reduced personal property tax and gets other niceties. Meanwhile, what I've spent on IVF/Surrogacy could buy a nice house in NYC.
I am unlikely to hold a valid medical to 65. Hell 45 is looking dicey right now (out of sick, on FAA leave, about to go to disability when that runs out)
Why? Because the FAA is freaking out over injuries I sustained in the service of the United States. That they previously cleared. But hey, that $1740 a month, I don't need that.
Oh, I'm unable to have children. That's a whopping $107 a month extra "loss of use of reproductive organ" on top of my VA disability. But hey making over $XX a year makes up for that. I'd rather literally have my balls back.
A lot of guys burn their sick to adjust schedules, go golf, whatever. Other non flying jobs I've had I had a PTO bank. Yep. Mine gets used up, often because either the issues I'm on VA Disability for flare up, or because of the special issuance medical I am on, again because of the injuries sustained while flying for the Navy, requires me to self ground for a few different items, for 24-96 hours depending on what it is.
But yeah, lets means test my stuff, while some Fobbit who had a buddy put everything in when he went to medical gets 100%, pays no property tax, reduced personal property tax and gets other niceties. Meanwhile, what I've spent on IVF/Surrogacy could buy a nice house in NYC.
#17
#18
That said, the one thing that affects my life on a daily basis, Sleep Apnea, the VA says isn't service connected because I'm "Morbidly Obese"
Never mind I flew with an OSA waiver from NAMI (think SI but Navy) and am 230 at 6'4".
But means testing is going to go with a lot of other things and be horribly abused. And not in a way that favors most veterans.
But the VA, every time I go in their office for ANYTHING, reminds me that if I would just file for TBI or PTSD, I'd be 100% tomorrow ($2k a month more and no property tax).
Why? Because the VA gets more for those things to fund research, more vets with TBI/PTSD, more research money. Those are also things that are HOLY BALLS hard to get FAA SIs for. I've been told by VA personnel to just say the "right things" and I would be granted 100%.
Of course, like most mental health things the FAA is binary. You are 100% crazy or 100% sane. With PTSD you are Ted Stryker from Airplane and never can get over Macho Grande, or you are stone cold Sully. Nobody in the middle. And they wonder why guys don't seek out treatment.
In my case, my neck, back and legs were injured in 2003. Cleared by Navy, reported to FAA, no further info requested for 20 years. Then they have started asking for ambulance trip sheets, and all sorts of things I just plain don't have. But hey, means test away.
And if we are going to go "no money unless you are REALLY disabled, then you need to actually up the 100% disabled rate to well north of the median income for the country.
I grew up with a 100% disabled veteran father. When he lost his medical, we lost our house. While the VA disability slowed the bleeding, there aren't many places where you can raise a family on what is now $36k a year.
But hey, being homeless as a kid was fun. It was like camping.
Nobody is getting rich living on VA disability.
Never mind I flew with an OSA waiver from NAMI (think SI but Navy) and am 230 at 6'4".
But means testing is going to go with a lot of other things and be horribly abused. And not in a way that favors most veterans.
But the VA, every time I go in their office for ANYTHING, reminds me that if I would just file for TBI or PTSD, I'd be 100% tomorrow ($2k a month more and no property tax).
Why? Because the VA gets more for those things to fund research, more vets with TBI/PTSD, more research money. Those are also things that are HOLY BALLS hard to get FAA SIs for. I've been told by VA personnel to just say the "right things" and I would be granted 100%.
Of course, like most mental health things the FAA is binary. You are 100% crazy or 100% sane. With PTSD you are Ted Stryker from Airplane and never can get over Macho Grande, or you are stone cold Sully. Nobody in the middle. And they wonder why guys don't seek out treatment.
In my case, my neck, back and legs were injured in 2003. Cleared by Navy, reported to FAA, no further info requested for 20 years. Then they have started asking for ambulance trip sheets, and all sorts of things I just plain don't have. But hey, means test away.
And if we are going to go "no money unless you are REALLY disabled, then you need to actually up the 100% disabled rate to well north of the median income for the country.
I grew up with a 100% disabled veteran father. When he lost his medical, we lost our house. While the VA disability slowed the bleeding, there aren't many places where you can raise a family on what is now $36k a year.
But hey, being homeless as a kid was fun. It was like camping.
Nobody is getting rich living on VA disability.
#19
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,023
https://www.cbo.gov/budget-options/58631
VA plan to the CBO to means test VA Compensation payouts. No more compensation if you earn $170K.
VA plan to the CBO to means test VA Compensation payouts. No more compensation if you earn $170K.
Summary:At the request of the House and Senate Committees on the Budget, the Congressional Budget Office periodically issues a compendium of budget options to help inform federal lawmakers about the implications of possible policy choices that would reduce the deficit. This year, the report is presented in two volumes. This volume, Options for Reducing the Deficit, 2023 to 2032—Volume I: Larger Reductions, contains detailed descriptions of 17 options that would each reduce the deficit by more than $300 billion over the next 10 years or, in the case of Social Security options, have a comparably large effect in later decades. A second volume, Options for Reducing the Deficit, 2023 to 2032—Volume II: Smaller Reductions, contains short descriptions of 59 options that would each reduce the deficit by less than $300 billion over that 10-year period.
The options come from a variety of sources, including legislative proposals, budget proposals from various Administrations, Congressional staff, other government entities, and private groups. The options are intended to reflect a range of possibilities rather than to rank priorities or present a comprehensive list. The inclusion or exclusion of a particular option does not represent an endorsement or a rejection by CBO. In keeping with CBO’s mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this report makes no recommendations.
The options come from a variety of sources, including legislative proposals, budget proposals from various Administrations, Congressional staff, other government entities, and private groups. The options are intended to reflect a range of possibilities rather than to rank priorities or present a comprehensive list. The inclusion or exclusion of a particular option does not represent an endorsement or a rejection by CBO. In keeping with CBO’s mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this report makes no recommendations.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post