Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
New AF aircraft in T-38 drop? >

New AF aircraft in T-38 drop?

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

New AF aircraft in T-38 drop?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2008, 09:35 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by TBoneF15
"Bro", allright I'll take the bait. The dude just asked if we were carrying blivots yet and you go on another big anti-Eagle rant.

You, tanker boy, and all the other dudes whining about the Eagles on this site are dead on right about one thing...Eagles have had nothing to do with this war. Believe me, NO ONE knows that more than than the Eagle dudes themselves. I've got a chest full of ze-f'in-ro of the highly coveted OIF/OEF Air Medals to prove it. There is a fight going on and we want to participate just like everyone else. But this ain't really my gig, now, is it? Nor is it yours! But show me one place where an Eagle driver claimed to be a war hero in OEF/OIF. You'd think, based on all the dudes on this site, that we've been running around congratulating ourselves on saving the world from terrorists this week.

So fighting falcons and everyone else can kill MiGs too. True. Was that in dispute on this site? But did I miss something about the Taliban Air Force launching some OCA sorties lately? So how is it exactly that air-to-air capability and JDAM capability blend to create "relevance" in this war?

Why don't the Eagles carry JDAM? Let's see...I'm not Chief of Staff, but maybe it's because WE AREN'T SHORT ON JDAM DROPPERS. Every other fighter/bomber platform in the US inventory can carry them. So why on earth would we drop a BUNCH of money THAT WE DON'T HAVE (due to the raptor/JSF) to upgrade another platform, then spend a bunch more money THAT WE DON'T HAVE (due to the raptor/JSF) to train dudes to a different mission, when we have MORE THAN ENOUGH dudes/jets/platforms for that mission already. Maybe that's why we don't have JDAM on the Eagle. Or maybe it's just a good idea to have dudes train to become really, really good at one mission. We might have learned that lesson before. Not sure.

You're right, I am absolutely not "relevant" to this war in my F-15C. Just as you are not relevant in your F-22. However, neither are the submarine dudes, neither are the Patriot dudes, neither are half the friggin military. And you know what...the next war that YOU are relevant for, the Eagles will be too.

Someone has to train for the "next war". Or do you think wars are all going to be like this one from now on? If so, why do you go to work every day? It would be a waste of your time, since you aren't "relevant". Maybe the next war will show us a robust air threat. Maybe it won't. But someone ought to train to fight one, don't ya think?

Or maybe we should just send all the F-16s to fight WWIII, because they train all the time for the large force, 4th gen, heavy EA air-to-air war. It's an easy problem for them, really. They just master it in their spare time between practicing CAS and SEAD. They can do it all..."as well or better" than me. Just ask 'em.
There are enough JDAM droppers!?!?

Tell that to the multiple Guard and Reserve hawg and viper units that have done MULTIPLE tours to the sandbox.

If the Eagle community would quit pounding their chests long enough to actually see how EASY a JDAM is to employ, they might actually get in to this war and help some brothers out. It isn't that big of a deal.

And for your last comment; you said it, not me.
F16Driver is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:40 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TBoneF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by F16Driver
There are enough JDAM droppers!?!?

Tell that to the multiple Guard and Reserve hawg and viper units that have done MULTIPLE tours to the sandbox.

If the Eagle community would quit pounding their chests long enough to actually see how EASY a JDAM is to employ, they might actually get in to this war and help some brothers out. It isn't that big of a deal.

And for your last comment; you said it, not me.
Yeah man, there are enough JDAM droppers. Let's see: B-1, B-2, B-52, A-10, F-15E, F-16, F-18, F-22...am I missing some? Literally the only fighter, attack, or bomber platform in the ENTIRE U.S. inventory without the JDAM is the rapidly depleting force of F-15Cs. And that's not my opinion...that's the opinion of the Air Staff, ACC, USAFE, PACAF, the ANG bureau, and all the other bubbas who control the money and priorities.

You seem to blame the Eagle bros for sitting this one out...like we're hanging around the bar on Friday night making airframe and budget decisions on behalf of the AF, then talking about how we're too good to help out while our country is at war. Do you think we're not there because we don't feel like it? Come on, man. Like we have any say in the matter. In case you didn't notice, some of our jets are falling apart. Literally. We cannot even afford to fix them all dude. We were just told we will likely close down squadrons over the next few years instead of fixing all the broken jets (including mine, and I'm a reservist so it sucks to be me). Do you think it's just a quick, free software upgrade and a Friday afternoon WATT and we'll be able to drop JDAM? Sorry dude, no matter how easy they are to employ, it's more than that and you know it. You said: "it's not a big deal"...actually it is. It's a big, EXPENSIVE deal. If we can't even afford to fix the structural problems we already have, how exactly is it that we can afford to make the hardware/software/training changes required to do an entirely new mission?

And while it must suck to go repeatedly to the sand container...believe it or not, we actually wish we were there with everyone else. It sucks to sit on the sidelines when there's a war going on. You have no idea how much. I'm just not sure how the few squadrons we have left would make much of a dent in your deployment schedule. Do you think the generals can make a budget justification to spend money to modify our jets because some squadrons have done "multiple" 120-day deployments in a five year war? Sorry man, the AF doesn't have a lot of budget credibilty right now at the wind tunnel as it is. Do you think we can make that argument with a straight face when the Army/Marines/National Guard have done multiple 15-month deployments in the same time?

And on your/my last point...why is it that Eagle dudes get accused of "chest thumping" and arrogance whenever we talk about being good at air-to-air. I'm not getting into a p--sing contest with you, but consider the facts: The Eagle has an extremely powerful radar, lots of missiles, tons of gas, and the pilots who fly it spend 100% of their time training to the air-to-air mission. If we aren't the best 4th gen fighter community in the world at air-to-air, there's a problem, don't you think? How much time do the other communities spend training to air-to-air...not BFM surge, not a 2v2 fight you way to the target, but a real, large force, outnumbered, heavy EA air-to-air scenario? Seriously...how much? Well that's our only job. That's all we do. We train to it non-stop! We aren't perfect at it and never will be, but it isn't chest thumping to say we do it pretty well. Like I said, if we aren't the best at it, there's a problem. AND IT'S NOT A SLAM ON EVERYONE ELSE TO SAY SO!

When I go back into another MDS's vault and look at all the stuff they have to be proficient at...SEAD, CAS, TST, regular strike missions, etc, AND they still have to be proficient at air to air, it looks overwhelming. I don't know how you possibly do it as well as you do. I spend all my time at one mission and will never be smart enough on it or proficient enough at it. Multi-role dudes have their hands full trying to be proficient at a lot of different missions and I give you all the credit in the world for that. But why do you always bow up and take it as a slam when we say we're the most proficient at our only mission?

Come on.

And just to put this thread on topic...if given a choice, I don't want to fly a UAV or a U-28 or a PC-12 or a desk. I'm selfish like that.
TBoneF15 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:00 PM
  #63  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,923
Default

Originally Posted by Slice
I think his name was Randy.
Nope...pretty sure that guy had no intentions ever of flying a light gray, much less being disappointed that he didn't "get" one on assignment night.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:03 PM
  #64  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,923
Default

Originally Posted by F16Driver
If the Eagle community would quit pounding their chests long enough to actually see how EASY a JDAM is to employ, they might actually get in to this war and help some brothers out. It isn't that big of a deal.
Now, if only there was a way the jets could magically get wired with 1760 busses.

Last I checked, though, that required a trip to Depot and some $$ to make happen -- even AFTER the pilots realized JDAMs were easy to employ.

Originally Posted by F16Driver
And for your last comment; you said it, not me.
I think your sarcasm detector is in the OFF position.

TBone, as for your two posts -- those are the most articulate and honest pieces I've ever seen from a light gray dude on the matter.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:18 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BDGERJMN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Walmart Greeter
Posts: 694
Default

is the AIM-120 not a 1760 weapon?
BDGERJMN is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:15 PM
  #66  
Line Holder
 
4 Fan Trashcan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: SWA Poolie
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e
Nope...pretty sure that guy had no intentions ever of flying a light gray, much less being disappointed that he didn't "get" one on assignment night.
If "light gray" isn't your thing, there's at least one metallic red/white/blue U-28 with your name on it. Seriously, I've seen it and it's bad***.

PS. Is your UPT website still up??
4 Fan Trashcan is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 03:47 AM
  #67  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: T-38 IP
Posts: 8
Default

TBone,

Amen brother!
F15Freak is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:19 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
c17heavy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 129
Default

I agree wholeheartedly to have fighter pilots who are EXPERTS solely in the air-air arena. They may not be in the fight now, but they will be, and history is the proof to back that up.

Before I troll my cargo through any airspace, I want to know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the MiGs and Sukhois are d-e-a-d. We (as a nation and even in the military) take air supremacy for granted.
c17heavy is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 05:45 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 244
Default

I agree with your response TBone. I will say your the FIRST light gray dude I've met that worded it right. I based my previous comment on what I've experienced from your community from my short 9 years in the Air Force. I realize that what I posted doesn't speak for all of the bros. We're all war fighters.

Let's just see if we can keep these old girls from breaking in half before our 20 years are up.

BTW, UAV's suck my white B***S!
F16Driver is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 08:59 PM
  #70  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,923
Default

Originally Posted by 4 Fan Trashcan
If "light gray" isn't your thing, there's at least one metallic red/white/blue U-28 with your name on it. Seriously, I've seen it and it's bad***.
I got to play with the U-28s a little last summer in Afghanistan, and to be honest, I'd have no problem flying with those guys (if I couldn't turn and burn anymore). Those guys kick some serious ass. Unfortunately, I'm fatter than the 185 pound max, or whatever it is.

Originally Posted by 4 Fan Trashcan
PS. Is your UPT website still up??
Had to take it down back circa '01. Got into a little trouble with it.
Hacker15e is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Moe Rudda
Regional
21
02-16-2008 04:50 PM
rickair7777
Regional
41
11-05-2007 04:52 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
49
10-11-2007 01:14 PM
CloudSailor
Cargo
35
10-10-2007 08:31 PM
nightrider
Cargo
23
09-27-2007 05:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices