Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

UPT wash out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2015, 11:05 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by 2loud View Post
This is important to note. Timing is everything. Remember the early '90s when 1/2 of the UPT grads were getting banked and the washout rates increased? We lost over 1/3 of our class and a couple of them washed out of T-38s in the last few weeks prior to graduation. Some classes washed out up to 50%-very rare but happened. Fast forward a decade...it took an act of God to wash anyone out.
I remember those times well since I was at the beginning of those times. The Marines had made earlier changes so didn't have the same problems, but the Navy was sending people to other duties not involving flying for lack of spaces further through the training pipelines (Fuels Officer on the USS Iwo Jima was always the joke - or was it??? )

I had to make the final call on whether he stayed or took a hike. It was one of the most difficult decisions of my life but I had to fail him. But still, it's a tough thing to crush someone's dream.
Yeah - I hear you about this. The RP that was washed out of the RAG (or FRS for the *newer* guys/gals ) was a Marine that I had to put the fork into at the squadron level at least - of course it had to go on further up the chain for the final say, but the Marine leadership seemed to listen to the endorsements more so than the Navy leadership at the time.

On top of that, he puked right into his mask so I had listen to the "slurping" sound for the rest of the sortie.
YIKES! I feel for this guy since I did the same thing on an early T-2C/Intermediate Strike sortie too. Luckily, it was the final 2 laps around the pattern at the end of the flight, so by the time my mask started shorting out it was time to land in any case. I had a good time cleaning out the O2 hose with the PRs watching and laughing though!
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 11:35 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Capt
Posts: 642
Default

Crewdawg,
Here's a listing of my class (87-04) and a few classes prior to and after mine.
Class. Entered. Attrition. Graduated
87-03. 61. 43%. 35
87-04. 52. 44%. 29
87-05. 48. 46%. 26
87-06. 61. 28%. 44
This was at Columbus AFB. Spanning a timeframe from Feb 1986 to June 1987
The numbers are slightly skewed because it doesn't account for students who washed back from another class, for Example we had 4 wash backs that graduated with my class so we actually graduated 25 out of the original 52. I know other classes had similar wash backs. The 87-06 class was an Academy class so that may explain their better performance, (Or the IP's put their hammers back in the closet for them)
Vito is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 11:52 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 396
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg View Post
He mentioned that in the 80s/early 90s the AF just threw a ridiculous amount of guys into UPT and filtered them out there. Well the AF can't afford to do that these days and seems to be more stringent in UPT selects. He thought that the average UPT stud was a better candidate than that of those in the years past. His words.

Not sure how big class sizes were back then, but for reference my class only had 25 studs and 2 washed out.
When I went through in the mid 90s, I can't remember exactly how many were in my class but let's just say that there were waaaaay more IPs than students (both in 37s and 38s). FAIPs were on their 2nd tour in a row (yeah, going on 6 years!). Morale was at an all time low, both IPs and student ranks. Back stabbing was the name of the game and IPs were literally crawling over each other to fly with students. Washout was the theme and stress was our meal. Pilot production was at 25% of the norm, so this "old" man was smoking something good and blowing smoke up your part of the body where the sun doesn't shine.
The reason why there aren't a whole lot of washouts as there used to is: 1) T-6s. Having the EFIS and glass cockpit makes everything easier. The scan is made simpler and big improvements on SA. The T-6 sim is also a huge improvement which keeps the cost down and enhances the learning experience. The saying was, the T-6 is easy to grasp but difficult to master while the T-37 was hard to grasp initially but easy to master. 2) Dual track. The "universal pilot" mentality disappeared since not everyone had to fly the T-38. Lets face it, very few people wash out of T-1s, if any from what I've seen.
2loud is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 01:22 PM
  #34  
Otto
 
MikeF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Turkish Pile Driver
Posts: 1,806
Default

Ok, I deleted as much chaff as possible without intentionally changing the meaning of the people I quoted. Since the forum has spoken and I was not clear; I will own that and be as concise as possible with an explanation prior to each quote.

First our OP who wants help with a reasonable request from what everybody assumes to be an American UPT washout.

Originally Posted by Hc130 View Post
I washed out of UPT training last year, after the Instrument phase of T-6 training.

Right Now I’m interested in civilian career, and I’m trying to get my instrument rating, (Passed the IFR written exam already)

I'm in a sort of rare position here, does anyone have any ideas? What should I do Who would I reach out to?
Wait, not an American? So a foreign SP has washed out for reasons unknown post instrument phase and now wants a ticket in the US.

Originally Posted by Hc130 View Post
I forgot to mention that I was international SP, and I'm no longer in the military.
I ask why he washed out, *crickets*.

Originally Posted by MikeF16 View Post
Why did you wash out?
No reply. I may not have used PC-speak, but anybody who has spent time as a white jet instructor knows there are 2 syllabi (official) and 2 sets of standards (unofficial). I did 5 years of white jets, 3 years at Luke, and 2 years in the UAE instructing their B-course (instructing in the UAE was a very different animal, I only mention this to show I have fairly extensive experience with international students), I never had any direct contact with or know 1st hand of an international student who washed out for poor flying skills. I've flown with plenty of international students who were far worse than the worst US washout I ever flew with, and every foreign student graduated. The OP asked for advice, this is mine. Don't turn into a smoking hole, go do something else.

Originally Posted by MikeF16 View Post
Back to the point, I absolutely have to ask that question. It takes an act of god to wash out an international. You should see the Nigerians and arabs we stick wings on, I bet 50% are smoking holes in some shlt hole I never plan to go back to. My point; if you washed out for flying, then let me offer you some sound life advice, find another profession -- this ain't your calling.
Huggy starts talking about US pilots. This has nothing to do with the OP. How many white jet instructors washed out a foreign student who arrived with thousands of civilian hours, or for that matter ever even saw one. No, the OP was likely not a regional pilot coming to UPT, he was probably a raw recruit with no proven credentials. Nowhere do I say or imply that if "you can't fly in the military environment you can't fly at all" as Huggy suggests. That's called a strawman argument, it isn't an honest debating principle. He made an inflammatory statement and then attributes it to me when I never said or implied it.

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post
During my two tours in AETC, I recall telling number of pilots this was not like civil flying. And we had pilots come through that had Regional Airline backgrounds... and washed out. They went back to the airlines.

A guy I went to college with washed out in T-38's and is now a Captain at a large legacy airline.

So now the thought pattern is that if you cannot fly in the military environment, you're unable to fly at all? Mike, I think your perspective is somewhat limited.
I point out Huggy's mistake

Originally Posted by MikeF16 View Post
As usual, an APCer doesn't read what he's responding to and makes an off base reply. Try rereading my post, I didn't say anything you're accusing me of.
Huggy replies as if I told the OP to kiss off and go ask his squadron mates. Where did I say that? Where was I rude? The only place where I was sarcastic was when I exaggerated about how many arab and Nigerian graduates turned into smoking holes -- not directed at the OP. News you don't want to hear is not the same as being rude. I gave correct advice (assuming he washed out for flying) which somehow turns into a personal attack on me. If I read Huggy's posts correctly, I have no respect for my civilian counterparts without military experience, I have limited perspective, and I'm rude. Yeah, to the post below I'm going to have a rude reply.

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post
Normally I would. But I think I'll pass this time.

I recall a couple of years ago when you started a few threads asking "should I retire and go to the airlines", as well as basic questions about ATPs and interviews. No one was sarcastic or rude to you, nor did they question how it was you didn't have the info you needed right in your squadron. Instead, they tried to help you.

And based on my impressions (right or wrong) of you from your early posts, you had very little knowledge of GA and civil flying.

As for my post, I disagree with what you wrote. If you'd like to comment, correct, or enlighten me, then please do so. I've learned plenty here and and maybe your rebuttal will give me something new to think about.

But save the rudeness for your 4-ship debrief.
MikeF16 is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 02:44 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Talk about thread drift......
WARich is offline  
Old 11-13-2015, 04:03 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

My class at Columbus (77-05) started with 30, graduated every single one of that 30 a year later. At that time, it was a first. Not even one washed back into our class. We had enough strong studs to carry the few weaker ones along and cooperated intensely everyday. Even cleaning rooms.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 11-14-2015, 01:12 AM
  #37  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by MikeF16 View Post
Words...
Bravo.
Feel better?
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 11-14-2015, 04:46 AM
  #38  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

These are the AF's numbers through the 90s:
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 11-14-2015, 04:47 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Capt
Posts: 642
Default

MikeF16,
Hard to believe that you never saw a foreign Stud wash out but I certainly don't doubt you. Reminds me of a funny story, my IP was debriefing me after a sortie and he see one of our Kuwaiti's sitting at a desk in the crew room reading something other than a T-37 related pub. He tells me that the kid was DNIF for months and only flew twice ( we were about one third of the way through Tweets at the time). He says to me, "Watch this," he then asks our DNIF friend,
"Lt Al-Immaz what do you think of the program so far?" The Kid looks at him with a big smile and gives him a thumbs up and says in broken English,
" Piece of Cake"
He washed out along with another Kuwaiti Stud. Heard he ended up trying to fly helicopters
Vito is offline  
Old 11-14-2015, 05:00 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

I saw a couple go through CBM in 88...wasn't a shock when I was driving over their old airbases after Desert Storm. They flew well enough to get the hell out when the fighting started.
Albief15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uvmflier
Military
9
03-23-2008 08:57 AM
PTWOB
Military
19
02-02-2008 06:43 AM
Colts07
Regional
20
10-03-2007 07:56 AM
uvmflier
Military
11
09-16-2007 04:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices