Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Other
Question for Commutair pilots >

Question for Commutair pilots

Search

Notices
Other Regional Airlines

Question for Commutair pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2012, 02:03 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freeze3192's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Just a city boy, born and raised in south Detroit
Posts: 108
Default

Originally Posted by MrBigAir
minus 1



plus 1 and then some.


cool.
freeze3192 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:04 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PerpetualFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 495
Default

Originally Posted by zildjian_zach
You guys obviously need the sad ego boost, so I'll just play along and act impressed...
I need an ego boost for pointing out your whining about how "hard" the 300 is to land? That MUST be it!
PerpetualFlyer is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:59 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: B737 F/O
Posts: 425
Default

As others have already pointed out, PDT/AC Jazz operate the Dash into 15L/33R without a problem. It was a nice, short taxi and excellent way to avoid waiting in line.
LostInPA is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 04:03 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
zildjian_zach's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Forever commuting
Posts: 161
Default

Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer
I need an ego boost for pointing out your whining about how "hard" the 300 is to land? That MUST be it!
Pardon me, but I said landing wasn't the problem. In fact my point was that landing was in fact the least of my concerns. I said it was a bit of a squeeze on the taxiways around the end of 15L, but that's my only complaint. But even that isn't a big deal. I agree with everyone that this is an overreaction to 2 unfortunately timed bad landings. I'm just not sure how I'm being "whiny" for agreeing with you?
zildjian_zach is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 04:54 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 59
Default

And actually the reason's you cited are the same one's Colgan stopped allowing 33R/15L arrivals for as well.
miller is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 07:36 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freeze3192's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Just a city boy, born and raised in south Detroit
Posts: 108
Default

Originally Posted by miller
And actually the reason's you cited are the same one's Colgan stopped allowing 33R/15L arrivals for as well.
boom. roasted.
freeze3192 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 08:06 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 62
Default

Originally Posted by ArcherDvr
I haven't heard that. that being said if we want to land on the longer one everytime, there's nothing wrong with that.
We're allowed to, and take pride in, landing on a 5,000' runway in the 737 or the Airbus. I still love to circle to Rwy 33 at DCA, it used to be expected, now ATC is stunned when someone will actually work with them. I offer it to them anytime things are getting congested, they aren't usually ready for the help anymore as so many pilots can't seem to circle these days.

In DCA, I've circled from 19 to Rwy 22, no fed on the jumpseat -less than 5,000', and landed 15 in an emergency (windshield was shattered, Helicopters followed us down the runway in case we went in the river). I think the only runway I haven't landed on in DCA is Rwy 4.

I've done the Expressway Visual into LGA with a 50 kt crosswind from the east and landed Rwy 17, short of Rwy 8/26 clearing on Alpha taxiway in ABQ while waving at the golfers - 737's and Airbuses.

It's an attitude, do you want to work with ATC and show your superior airmanship or just do your job and cover your a$$.

Too many pilots, especially the young ones, just want to do the "least risk" maneuver than do what they are paid for - make it work and work with ATC.

When I'm cleared for a visual, plan on me turning towards the end of the runway, there are "style points" with both pilots and controllers.

ATC appreciates the help, loves the airshow, the outcome of the maneuver was never in doubt and the passengers buy the lowest priced ticket the next time they fly.

Give me any runway at anytime and I'll do it if humanly possible. I can side step at 750 AGL any day.

That's why I got into aviation and still love it.

Sadly many pilots could do all these things also, they're just in a "certificate protection" mindset.

Too many Attorneys and too many pilots worried about doing something no one else is doing these days.

Last edited by nbecca; 08-07-2012 at 08:27 PM.
nbecca is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 08:30 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
goaround2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: ERJ145 Captain
Posts: 473
Default

Originally Posted by nbecca
We're allowed to, and take pride in, landing on a 5,000' runway in the 737 or the Airbus. I still love to circle to rwy 33 at DCA.

I've circled to rwy 22, no fed on the jumpseat and landed 15 in an emergency (windshield was shattered, Helicopters followed us down the runway in case we went in the river). I think the only runway I haven't landed on in DCA is rwy 4.

I've done the Expressway Visual into LGA with a 50 kt crosswind (from the east) and landed rwy 17, short of rwy 8/26 clearing on Alpha taxiway - 737's and Airbuses.

It's an attitude, do you want to work with ATC and show your superior airmanship or just do your job and cover your a$$.

Too many pilots, especially the young ones, just want to do the "least risk" maneuver than do what they are paid for - make it work and work with ATC.

When I'm cleared for a visual, plan on me turning towards the end of the runway, there are "style points" with both pilots and controllers.

ATC appreciates the help, loves the airshow, the outcome of the maneuver was never in doubt and the passengers buy the lowest priced ticket the next time they fly.

That's why I got into aviation and still love it.
We'll be reading about you one of these days, and not for landing in the Hudson with dial engine failure!

BTW, ATC works for us, not the other way around, the word "unable" is something I'm not afraid to use when they attempt to grow a brain. Their job is traffic separation, mine is safety.
goaround2000 is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 09:26 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 62
Default

Originally Posted by goaround2000
We'll be reading about you one of these days, and not for landing in the Hudson with dial engine failure!

BTW, ATC works for us, not the other way around, the word "unable" is something I'm not afraid to use when they attempt to grow a brain. Their job is traffic separation, mine is safety.
Yep, that's the mindset I'm talking about, ATC doesn't work for us and we don't work for them, we work together sonny. Now that we have TCAS, your job is also separation. ATC's job has always been safety in addition to "separation" and dealing with bonehead pilots.

Got 30 years of jet PIC, no accidents, incidents or violations. I've been teaching young men and women how to be a FO or Capt or just a pilot for 23 years.

The Captain's job is to use their resources in ensuring that we have a safe flight and that everyone is working together towards that end - all the while making the plane preform to it's max capabilities.

In 30 years, I can count on one hand the number of times I've said, "Unable." There's been plenty of times when I said "Sorry, everybody has a first day at work and today is his or hers" while doing OE.

I've also made my share of mistakes, but I've learned from every one of them. I don't move my plane until I'm sure of what is expected of me. Sometimes that's embarrassing but it's the safest thing to do.

I was doing Captain OE and the candidate ended up high as he!!. I showed him how to get down safely and he said something I thought was profound. He said, "I guess one of the first things you need to learn on a new airplane is how to recover."

Yes, sometimes the best "recovery" is a go-around but if you are actually paying attention to what the airplane in front of you is doing, what the controller is doing and what your plane is capable of, you will rarely find yourself in a surprise situation.

It kills me when I ask, "What aircraft is three ahead of us and what two airplanes are behind us" and the pilot I'm flying with has no clue.

How many pilots pre-tune ground after we switch to tower? How many pilots know what type (size and make) of the airplane above us or below us in the NAT Tracks? How many pilots start to taxi without a clue of what the previous three airplanes taxi instructions were? How many pilots screw up a clearance because they didn't listen to the clearances before ours?

Are you actually a PROFESSIONAL pilot or just some schmuck working the radios, tiller, yoke or joystick.

I listened to a Captain saying he was going to report ATC at DCA because EVERYtime he went to DCA they left him high. Is that ATC's fault or just a lack of interest or understanding on how the system works every single friggin day?

Do you know what they do at ORD or MDW or SAN or HKG? If you don't than find another job, because you're obviously not a professional pilot.

You guys want to be paid as professionals but the majority spend as little time as possible getting to know their aircraft, the challenges any given airport presents and taking pride in being 30 miles ahead of your plane instead of 10 miles behind it.

A great flight doesn't happen by accident and the better someone is at their job, the easier it looks. That begins and ends with preparation.

It's sad to see the degradation of the profession as the pilot ranks are filled with people (who are not not pilots) chasing the dollar and having all the gee-whiz stuff from flight hour one, causing them to never develop the skills to be in charge and blame everyone else for their failures.

The last little jet I flew, like a 145, I did everything, from working with the FAA, to bidding the price of the flight, stocking the aircraft, ordering the catering, filing the flight plans, selecting tech stops, arranging transportation and hotels for millionaires, building the MEL's and all other manuals, cleaning the hanger until it shined, hiring cleaners or cleaning the plane with my Co-Captain, hiring the flight attendants and FLYING the airplane. I loved that job. I don't know that I'd want to go back to it for what it paid then, but it was a great experience in my mid 20's.

You just sit down, sign a piece of paper and wait for everyone to tell you when to push. It doesn't seem like you have much to worry about except being a professional pilot which entails left, right, up, down and working with the system with a modicum of interest, pride in a job well done and being a professional pilot. You're very entitled, self-centered and short sighted.

So quit whining and do your job as a professional or get out. And try not to say "unable" for a year or so.

Last edited by nbecca; 08-07-2012 at 10:01 PM.
nbecca is offline  
Old 08-07-2012, 09:43 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by nbecca
We're allowed to, and take pride in, landing on a 5,000' runway in the 737 or the Airbus. I still love to circle to Rwy 33 at DCA, it used to be expected, now ATC is stunned when someone will actually work with them. I offer it to them anytime things are getting congested, they aren't usually ready for the help anymore as so many pilots can't seem to circle these days.

In DCA, I've circled from 19 to Rwy 22, no fed on the jumpseat -less than 5,000', and landed 15 in an emergency (windshield was shattered, Helicopters followed us down the runway in case we went in the river). I think the only runway I haven't landed on in DCA is Rwy 4.

I've done the Expressway Visual into LGA with a 50 kt crosswind from the east and landed Rwy 17, short of Rwy 8/26 clearing on Alpha taxiway in ABQ while waving at the golfers - 737's and Airbuses.

It's an attitude, do you want to work with ATC and show your superior airmanship or just do your job and cover your a$$.

Too many pilots, especially the young ones, just want to do the "least risk" maneuver than do what they are paid for - make it work and work with ATC.

When I'm cleared for a visual, plan on me turning towards the end of the runway, there are "style points" with both pilots and controllers.

ATC appreciates the help, loves the airshow, the outcome of the maneuver was never in doubt and the passengers buy the lowest priced ticket the next time they fly.

Give me any runway at anytime and I'll do it if humanly possible. I can side step at 750 AGL any day.

That's why I got into aviation and still love it.

Sadly many pilots could do all these things also, they're just in a "certificate protection" mindset.

Too many Attorneys and too many pilots worried about doing something no one else is doing these days.
Congratulations, all of those runways are 150' wide. That's not the point though. The risk isn't in the landing it's taxiing off the runway. Just look at the beewie taxiways off 33R/15L, they're narrow and have sharp turns with a pretty significant elevation change. I happily flew 402's and a BE9L's into that runway day and night, but when it comes to large, transport category aircraft it just isn't worth dropping a wheel off the taxiway for the two minutes it might save you in sequencing. I flew the Q for 9L and now I'm flying Dash's for C5 and I think it was just a matter of time before this happened.

Edit to add: since this thread has turned into a wiener measuring contest, how many times have you landed on 33R in BOS? You want fun, now that's a rush. Damn to relive my 9K days . . .

Last edited by miller; 08-07-2012 at 09:53 PM.
miller is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
nw320driver
Foreign
35
10-15-2010 07:41 PM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices