Flaps 45 vs. 22
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 264
So when you are in turbulence I take it you don't bother with trying to find a smoother altitude for customer comfort. Smooth landings and not going off the end of the runway are all part of being safe, and giving the customers the best flying experience possible. I could give a **** about your riddle contests. I do care that landing flaps 22 all the time because it's perceived to be better extends the landing roll out and come winter time can be a real problem when the runway is icy.
#13
I went through the 145 program pretty early, and we were basically always doing flaps 22. In the sim and during SOE. Sometime in the past 6 months, the training department decided flaps 45 should be the norm.
If you went through early, you probably prefer flaps 22. If you've been through recently, you probably prefer flaps 45. We like what we're used to. It's that simple.
As people start going through recurrent, flaps 45 will become the norm throughout the airline
If you went through early, you probably prefer flaps 22. If you've been through recently, you probably prefer flaps 45. We like what we're used to. It's that simple.
As people start going through recurrent, flaps 45 will become the norm throughout the airline
runways under 7000 feet. One exception: I don't like it on 35 in PHL unless i have a tailwind.
#14
New Hire
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 616
I think this is the most accurate statement. I never did a flaps 45 landing in training at all (or a flaps 22 takeoff) I did one flaps 45 landing on SOE. I'm not a huge fan to be honest, but I've warmed up to 45 a little. I usually use it for significant contamination and and some
runways under 7000 feet. One exception: I don't like it on 35 in PHL unless i have a tailwind.
runways under 7000 feet. One exception: I don't like it on 35 in PHL unless i have a tailwind.
#16
New Hire
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 616
I was there during that period. Flaps 22 was chewing up brakes at an astonishing rate. So they quickly told everyone to go to Flaps 45 right away. Fun experiment.
#17
On Reserve
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
I think this is the most accurate statement. I never did a flaps 45 landing in training at all (or a flaps 22 takeoff) I did one flaps 45 landing on SOE. I'm not a huge fan to be honest, but I've warmed up to 45 a little. I usually use it for significant contamination and and some
runways under 7000 feet. One exception: I don't like it on 35 in PHL unless i have a tailwind.
runways under 7000 feet. One exception: I don't like it on 35 in PHL unless i have a tailwind.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
I also liked using 45. With a little practice, you can land just as smooth on 45 as you can on 22. I know at some of the cities TSA goes, (GUC, DIK, etc), there was very little that would encourage me to use flaps 22.
#19
Exactly. I use FL45 until wind gusts over 20 knots. Then I usually use 22. Always FL45 on 35/17.
#20
Ok I am glad we are having this discussion because it isn't happening on SOE with some it appears, me included. As much as I'm getting comfortable with using eiither, I am seeing new hires who are very hesitant to go with 45, even when they should. Some very afraid of even a squeak above 145 knots with it, making large power changes to avoid, de-stabilizing, etc...even though momentary up to 155 is permitted and I believe EV even permits up to 160 knots momentary. If we want a shift then we need to get the facts out there clearly and of course keep utlizing the skill.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Denver
Flight Schools and Training
18
03-28-2009 04:24 PM