PSA/Piedmont/Eagle: What if...
01-30-2013, 06:02 AM
#21
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by embraer
Yeah, I love how people who don't even work at Eagle feel so confident in making absolute statements about our company. They take crew room gossip and re-post it on internet forums without having any knowledge of what is actually taking place.
In this case, he does work at Eagle, but has yet to make his first factually worthwhile post and is stuck in someplace called "Joeyland". Must have fell off his horse one too many times...........
01-30-2013, 10:04 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Originally Posted by J4000
And you all wonder why we don't get any respect as educated professionals. One need only read one page of one thread anywhere on this board and it gets pretty obvious. (sigh...)
01-30-2013, 10:36 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
And with that, you can flowthru to a major!
01-30-2013, 12:26 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Originally Posted by stbloc
If you would merge the three, PDT assets would not benefit any potential buyer. I'm not sure PSA would help this formula either. Cheaper to shut it down and sell the parts. If you look at them template of the other mergers they wouldn't need all this lift, so someone is going to take the fall.
Originally Posted by embraer
Yeah, I love how people who don't even work at Eagle feel so confident in making absolute statements about our company. They take crew room gossip and re-post it on internet forums without having any knowledge of what is actually taking place.
Side note..... It would be very easy to put CRJ700's on PSA and get rid of CRJ200's over night.... Every pilot on property is already trained and checked out on both.... That would mean absolutely zero training cost involved if more large RJ's were indeed purchased by USairways with a place to be put to be determined. Not sure how easy it would be to take AE and get rid of E145s and get all their pilots trained on the CRJ700 or larger and or cost effective that would be as well..... There is a place for all three in a combined airline.... Now lets stop worrying about any of these because none of us have a say anyways in what will happen.
01-30-2013, 04:12 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 618
Originally Posted by meyers9163
Ironic here no? Kind of seems like the above post about PSA/PDT takes an absolute statement too....
However I do see small value in PSA because on the 700's as you stated, but that depends on if they own them, lease, lease termination dates, and many other financial factors.
Last edited by stbloc; 01-30-2013 at 04:22 PM. Reason: ..................
01-30-2013, 04:41 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Originally Posted by stbloc
Fine, then some idiot just might merge the three and find value I don't see.
However I do see small value in PSA because on the 700's as you stated, but that depends on if they own them, lease, lease termination dates, and many other financial factors.
However I do see small value in PSA because on the 700's as you stated, but that depends on if they own them, lease, lease termination dates, and many other financial factors.
