Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   PSA Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/psa-airlines/)
-   -   Stop coming here (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/psa-airlines/116113-stop-coming-here.html)

Happyflyer 09-11-2018 05:21 PM


Originally Posted by FlyingSlowly (Post 2672383)
You completely missed the point. Or you purposefully misquoted me to prove yours. I said a Captain should make $150k, not that $150k should be the base starting salary. I never said or implied that aviation is MORE sacred than other professions. My attitude is far from it. Just that it should pay more LIKE other professional occupations. But if you want to argue for less pay...by all means go for it.



Do your research before throwing out hypotheticals. CLT is the most profitable hub the world's largest airline. AAG is not hemorrhaging cash to pay us. Quite the opposite. They are making tons of cash because of the support that PSA provides to the CLT hub. Furthermore, the reason that they have been growing PSA is because we are already cheaper than the non W/O options.

It's not just about my ideas on the matter... If you observe the regional industry as a whole, other regional options are largely downsizing or consolidating. It starts to become pretty obvious that the remaining options for taking the place of PSA are either more expensive, or have fleet teething issues of their own. But if you want to help weaken our collective bargaining position by buying into, or even promoting management-style scare tactics, that's your right to do so...

Actually AA is not going to be "good" by comparison this year to other airlines profit. May even be the least profitable airline this year, and they have the largest fleet with the most RJ scope.

Irishblackbird 09-11-2018 08:39 PM


Originally Posted by Happyflyer (Post 2672449)
Actually AA is not going to be "good" by comparison this year to other airlines profit. May even be the least profitable airline this year, and they have the largest fleet with the most RJ scope.

Yep, how deep into Dads wallet did we get when we wiped out his Buick this past summer?

Jecain7 09-11-2018 08:45 PM

$35 million according to USA today...

irrelevant 09-12-2018 04:11 AM


Originally Posted by Irishblackbird (Post 2672581)
Yep, how deep into Dads wallet did we get when we wiped out his Buick this past summer?

Just as PSA management takes no responsibility when things go wrong, I am certainly not taking any for that one.

chrisreedrules 09-12-2018 04:14 AM


Originally Posted by Jecain7 (Post 2672584)
$35 million according to USA today...

Enough to give every pilot on property a $18 /hour raise.

And while not insignificant, that $35 million dollars is just a footnote for AAG. They look at that number and don’t even blink. AAG reported a pre-tax profit of $769 million dollars just for this 2nd quarter by itself.

But hey, it’s a business. They aren’t in the business of handing out many when and where they don’t think they need to. We’re filling classes and attrition is manageable. Until that changes or we find ourselves with some more leverage this is it.

chrisreedrules 09-12-2018 04:17 AM


Originally Posted by irrelevant (Post 2672675)
Just as PSA management takes no responsibility when things go wrong, I am certainly not taking any for that one.

But you know truthfully, why should they take any more accountability than they already do? It’s not like AAG writes PSA managment a blank check and says, “here go buy whatever you need”. They have budgets and things like tens of million spent on a new IT infrastructure are hard to justify at a time when fuel prices are surging and the industry is on the cusp of retirements that will put the leverage in the hands of labor for the next decade.

It’s not like they didn’t have some idea that the IT infrastructure was dated and at risk. If AAG doesn’t want to spend money on it, PSA doesn’t get new IT. If AAG doesn’t want pilots at its WOs to get a raise, they don’t get a raise. It’s not as if our managment is calling these shots.

irrelevant 09-12-2018 04:20 AM


Originally Posted by chrisreedrules (Post 2672678)
But you know truthfully, why should they take any more accountability than they already do? It’s not like AAG writes PSA managment a blank check and says, “here go buy whatever you need”. They have budgets and things like tens of million spent on a new IT infrastructure are hard to justify at a time when fuel prices are surging and the industry is on the cusp of retirements that will put the leverage in the hands of labor for the next decade.

Because they are responsible for the operation.

chrisreedrules 09-12-2018 04:23 AM


Originally Posted by irrelevant (Post 2672682)
Because they are responsible for the operation.

Right. They are responsible for making sure the wheels stay on this bus so to speak. But they aren’t any more responsible for this than the regional manager of a fast food chain is of their different locations. If corporate doesn’t think they need new digital cash registers, they don’t get new cash registers despite this regional manager telling them otherwise.

irrelevant 09-12-2018 05:05 AM


Originally Posted by chrisreedrules (Post 2672686)
Right. They are responsible for making sure the wheels stay on this bus so to speak. But they aren’t any more responsible for this than the regional manager of a fast food chain is of their different locations. If corporate doesn’t think they need new digital cash registers, they don’t get new cash registers despite this regional manager telling them otherwise.

They certainly didn't do an admirable job of keeping the wheels on the bus back in June.

I have higher expectations of management of a supposedly stand-alone company than you do. This is probably due in part to my disdain for the way the industry is structured, with legacy carriers utilizing contractors and subsidiaries to avoid paying wage levels they otherwise would if they performed the services "in-house". Meanwhile the legacy carrier still effectively exercises "operational control", and portrays the service level as equal to the legacy brand...until something goes wrong...then it's the subsidiary's fault.

I'd probably be more willing to accept the above, if someone would step up and accept responsibility and accountability. That doesn't happen though with PSA. It's always "outside our control"...which leads to the rational question - "If it's outside our control, how does anything anyone does matter?"

I applaud you for being able to better accept the reality of the situation. You're probably even able to wear the American Airlines lanyard to hold your badge on...despite the fact that our pay comes not from AA, but from PSA.

I struggle with the "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" operating philosophy. You can consider it a character flaw.

chrisreedrules 09-12-2018 07:13 AM


Originally Posted by irrelevant (Post 2672716)
They certainly didn't do an admirable job of keeping the wheels on the bus back in June.

I have higher expectations of management of a supposedly stand-alone company than you do. This is probably due in part to my disdain for the way the industry is structured, with legacy carriers utilizing contractors and subsidiaries to avoid paying wage levels they otherwise would if they performed the services "in-house". Meanwhile the legacy carrier still effectively exercises "operational control", and portrays the service level as equal to the legacy brand...until something goes wrong...then it's the subsidiary's fault.

I'd probably be more willing to accept the above, if someone would step up and accept responsibility and accountability. That doesn't happen though with PSA. It's always "outside our control"...which leads to the rational question - "If it's outside our control, how does anything anyone does matter?"

I applaud you for being able to better accept the reality of the situation. You're probably even able to wear the American Airlines lanyard to hold your badge on...despite the fact that our pay comes not from AA, but from PSA.

I struggle with the "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" operating philosophy. You can consider it a character flaw.

I’d really rather wear a different lanyard. I wish PSA ALPA would make some.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands