![]() |
Originally Posted by DoNoHarm
(Post 3348524)
Not exactly true. Some of those new hires have already left class, so the 71 number isnt correct. Also, several that left were put on PER leave (not flows), and not sure why. Some pilots that left over a month ago are still on the list as well.
The worse part is that PSA traded lots of captains for new hire FOs, and lost a lot of Check Airmen as well. |
Was 45 the November or December losses?
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3348546)
Was 45 the November or December losses?
…filler |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3348546)
Was 45 the November or December losses?
|
The company to union numbers are presumably accurate. This isn’t a syssen comparison
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3348561)
The company to union numbers are presumably accurate. This isn’t a syssen comparison
|
I understand that, but part of the bonus LOA was that the company has to give the union a detailed attrition breakdown every month. They send that out in an email.
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3348575)
I understand that, but part of the bonus LOA was that the company has to give the union a detailed attrition breakdown every month. They send that out in an email.
|
Originally Posted by AboveAndBeyond
(Post 3348649)
Did the LOA say that it had to be accurate? Hahaha
|
Originally Posted by DoNoHarm
(Post 3348524)
Not exactly true. Looks like 58 gone, including the flows. Some of those new hires have already left class, so the 71 number isnt correct. Also, several that left were put on PER leave (not flows), and not sure why. Some pilots that left over a month ago are still on the list as well.
The worse part is that PSA traded lots of captains for new hire FOs, and lost a lot of Check Airmen as well. Thanks! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands