Eagle MEC email with PSA TA lowlights
09-08-2013 | 04:28 PM
#62
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
This entire thread is filled with whiny a** liberalism. How could anyone buy into this, "do what's best for the entire regional airline industry"? This thought process is being farmed by MEC leaders and pilots that are concerned for their future. There are not too many other cards for them to play, don't buy into this stuff, they are only out for themselves. Do what is best for YOU, only YOU.
09-08-2013 | 04:54 PM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Hot tub for now
So vote for a communist TA?
Doesn't sound very republican of you.
Life is about freedom of choices. This TA removes those for you. At the same time cutting your pay, increasing your insurance premiums and hurting your fellow man.
I like the people i work with. If you do too, then vote NO.
Doesn't sound very republican of you.
Life is about freedom of choices. This TA removes those for you. At the same time cutting your pay, increasing your insurance premiums and hurting your fellow man.
I like the people i work with. If you do too, then vote NO.
09-08-2013 | 06:33 PM
#64
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
This entire thread is filled with whiny a** liberalism. How could anyone buy into this, "do what's best for the entire regional airline industry"? This thought process is being farmed by MEC leaders and pilots that are concerned for their future. There are not too many other cards for them to play, don't buy into this stuff, they are only out for themselves. Do what is best for YOU, only YOU.
Sounds like the rationalization if a sugar-baby who'd hitch themselves to the first sugar-momma who would be willing to fulfill his needs.
09-09-2013 | 04:36 AM
#67
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Threats and intimidation didn't make the Pinnacle pilots vote no, and it won't make the PSA pilots vote no. I predict it passes 60-80%.
All that can be said is read between the lines and consider every possible outcome of every clause before you decide. From what I've heard this thing is so full of loopholes favorable to the company that you may as well just decertify and go without a contract. Good luck.
All that can be said is read between the lines and consider every possible outcome of every clause before you decide. From what I've heard this thing is so full of loopholes favorable to the company that you may as well just decertify and go without a contract. Good luck.
09-09-2013 | 04:59 AM
#68
Underpaid...
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Threats and intimidation didn't make the Pinnacle pilots vote no, and it won't make the PSA pilots vote no. I predict it passes 60-80%.
All that can be said is read between the lines and consider every possible outcome of every clause before you decide. From what I've heard this thing is so full of loopholes favorable to the company that you may as well just decertify and go without a contract. Good luck.
All that can be said is read between the lines and consider every possible outcome of every clause before you decide. From what I've heard this thing is so full of loopholes favorable to the company that you may as well just decertify and go without a contract. Good luck.
09-09-2013 | 05:04 AM
#69
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 18
Threats and intimidation didn't make the Pinnacle pilots vote no, and it won't make the PSA pilots vote no. I predict it passes 60-80%.
All that can be said is read between the lines and consider every possible outcome of every clause before you decide. From what I've heard this thing is so full of loopholes favorable to the company that you may as well just decertify and go without a contract. Good luck.
All that can be said is read between the lines and consider every possible outcome of every clause before you decide. From what I've heard this thing is so full of loopholes favorable to the company that you may as well just decertify and go without a contract. Good luck.
ALPA needs to learn to integrate groups at longevity / seniority steps that credit work done for companies we shut down. Otherwise getting enough no voters is futile.
09-09-2013 | 05:15 AM
#70
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
What are you talking about? Both the company and ALPA threatened our jobs. The judge had said that Pinnacle only needed to modify a few things to get the bankruptcy agreement approved. The union said that they weren't going back to court. Delta was going to shut us down.
ALPA needs to learn to integrate groups at longevity / seniority steps that credit work done for companies we shut down. Otherwise getting enough no voters is futile.
ALPA needs to learn to integrate groups at longevity / seniority steps that credit work done for companies we shut down. Otherwise getting enough no voters is futile.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
