Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > PSA Airlines
Eagle MEC email with PSA TA lowlights >

Eagle MEC email with PSA TA lowlights

Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

Eagle MEC email with PSA TA lowlights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2013 | 08:43 AM
  #41  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Originally Posted by block30
I wonder if the PSA guys vote this down, management will come back later and try to pull a Pinnacle on you...threaten a "vote for this or die!" situation... :/
How would that be possible? Pinnacle could have gone straight back to the bankruptcy judge and gotten the Jcba rejected as they knew what needed to be changed after the first 1113C proposal got rejected. Is PSA in bankruptcy?
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 08:56 AM
  #42  
bradeku1008's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: CRJ 200/700/900 CA & Instructor
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs
How would that be possible? Pinnacle could have gone straight back to the bankruptcy judge and gotten the Jcba rejected as they knew what needed to be changed after the first 1113C proposal got rejected. Is PSA in bankruptcy?
From what I was told they already said if we don't do this PSA will go away with the 200s in 2018. A threat coming down from US Airways Management scaring some of the younger guys and the senior guys into a Yes vote. Talking with some people in the pilot group there are a few that I thought would vote No who are voting Yes, and some who are voting Yes that I could have bet my house on that they would have voted No. The pilot group is divided on th TA and in the past week this place has been a disaster.
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 09:24 AM
  #43  
meeko031's Avatar
alchemist
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Default

but they could shut PSA down even if the pilot group signs the TA, why not go out with heads held high by voting no!
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 09:26 AM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: GLG20
Cool

Originally Posted by bradeku1008
From what I was told they already said if we don't do this PSA will go away with the 200s in 2018. A threat coming down from US Airways Management scaring some of the younger guys and the senior guys into a Yes vote. Talking with some people in the pilot group there are a few that I thought would vote No who are voting Yes, and some who are voting Yes that I could have bet my house on that they would have voted No. The pilot group is divided on th TA and in the past week this place has been a disaster.





Great...can't wait to get started
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 09:38 AM
  #45  
New Hire
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: EMB 170/190
Default

Originally Posted by bradeku1008
From what I was told they already said if we don't do this PSA will go away with the 200s in 2018. A threat coming down from US Airways Management scaring some of the younger guys and the senior guys into a Yes vote. Talking with some people in the pilot group there are a few that I thought would vote No who are voting Yes, and some who are voting Yes that I could have bet my house on that they would have voted No. The pilot group is divided on th TA and in the past week this place has been a disaster.
They will still go regardless of the vote. There is no fleet size agreement in that TA.
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 09:41 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: B737 /FO
Default

They told Eagle pilots that all the EMBs would be parked too. Came right from TG. We are now being told we will slow the parking of the 140/145s to maintain AA regional needs.

It's all bull****.
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 09:42 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: B737 /FO
Default

They can't ComAir every regional.
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 09:46 AM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: horizontal
Default

Maybe a lesson for the youngsters, avoid the wholly owned like the plague. Regional instability is bad enough without threats of shutdowns for not playing ball. Mainline is trying one last effort to lock down low costs before staffing becomes a serious issue at the regionals. All regionals will soon be competing for a shrinking pool of pilots and these pilots will get to pick where they want to go.
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 09:52 AM
  #49  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by SebastianDesoto
They can't ComAir every regional.
Saabs, this is what I was wondering...I used the Pinnacle reference, because of the recency, but Com Air, being wholly owned got the Axe...I was wondering what threats the PSA group is getting if they vote no.
Reply
Old 09-08-2013 | 10:26 AM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Default

You neophytes ought to do a little research before you start attacking each other as if you individually or as a group have any say or control in what goes on. Those at the top of the food chain look at this as just a way to make profit on widgets. How much revenue can I get out of a 50 seat, 70 seat, or a 300 seat widget and what’s the cost? A pilot is just another component to remove and replace as needed that is a cost.

We can all thank Alfred E. Kahn, who presided over deregulation of the airline industry during the Carter administration, paving the way for JetBlue, Southwest, AirTran and other low-cost carriers. He led the move to deregulate U.S. airlines as chief Civil Aeronautics Board. The board had to give its approval before airlines could fly specific routes or change fares. Then we had President Jimmy Carter, thought deregulation a swell idea as a means of stimulating economic growth. Big Al and Little Jimmy C were instrumental in garnering the support needed to push through the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 - the first thorough dismantling of a comprehensive system of government control since 1935.

This unleashed the likes of Frank Lorenzo and Carl Icahn. Do whatever it takes to make a ton of money regardless of the impact on the employees.

Basic business practices at work. Whipsaw one employee group against the other to drive the costs down. They all set back laughing at you chuckleheads bickering back and forth, settle for less and work more. Meanwhile, they get a big bonus for increased productivity. The legacy carriers are using wholly owned vs contractors who in turn use pilot vs pilot.

This has been going on for years and by the time you guys figure it out you’ll be too old to give a crap and just say yeah, well, I got mine and I had to fight for it, screw the junior puke he can fight for his.

Been there, done that, now using the T-shirt to wipe the oil off my deepsteek.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AA gear puller
Major
166
08-19-2014 04:29 PM
Flyguppy
United
228
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
bgmann
Regional
33
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
6
10-17-2010 08:07 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices