Hand flying: CRJ vs E175?
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
For the pilot flying it was pretty easy. I looked over and just some adjustments to the yoke and thrust. As pilot monitoring, I have to change all the altitude and speed bugs and heading bugs, get performance data, make all the radio calls and switches, weather, etc. If the PF turns the autopilot on, then at least he gets to move all the altitude/speed/headings bugs. Not that big of a deal but on such a short flight without fore warning, there were just some moments where I was pretty busy.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
#25
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 83
Same thing happened to me. Turned off AP and FD in cruise prior to starting decent into DFW...Needless to say my workload was insane and I'll tell you what, it was super sloppy. On the ground, he apologized. I told him nothing wrong with hand flying, but maybe leave the FD on next time until you are set up for the visual. We survived with no paper work. Well there would have been had I not called the field when I realized he shot past the assigned base heading by 30 degrees. Good times.
#26
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 39
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,948
Typical dick measuring competition. I'll do it visual at an outstation, guys that do it flying a complicated arrival are just showing off at the possible expense of my ticket. I don't care if they hand fly as long as the FD is up, but RNAV arrivals were designed for automation usage.
#30
Try flying a round-dial commuter prop single pilot in the soup with an engine failure and/or a radio malfunction and then tell me being a PM while PF handflys a modern jet is hard work.. Also, a good PF, spins his bugs and navs when it gets busy. If the PF is just moving the yoke and throttles, then that’s not very nice, but still manageable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post