Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

25 New 175’s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2018 | 07:57 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It’s scope compliant but does not make economic sense. The aircraft is really a 82 seater in a normal configuration. The majors are hedging their bets they can reconfigure them to 76 seats in the next round of contracts. I don’t see that happening.
Not really. Do you know what a TCDS is and have you ever looked at the E170/175's? It will show you all the models of the planes.

All of these planes currently being delivered with 76 seats can only have 76 seats in them not because of scope but because that particular model was limited to 76 seats by Embraer. It would require a recertification of the individual aircraft to install more than 76 seats. A plane can be changed once delivered, but it will cost money to do so. The number of planes delivered at 76 seats far outweighs the number delivered over 76 seats.

Also a 70 seat 175 is not that inefficient. Our E170's and 175's have the same exact engines even though our 170's are slightly lighter. Even though the 175 is slightly heavier, it has a more efficient wing than what the 170 does. The 170 is not in production, so the only option is the 175SC.

Even if United would order a new SNB, that would still open up addition UAX frames, so they might still keep these planes at 70 seats and order more 76 seaters or they could keep the UAX fleet number flat and add the extra seats. My guess is they would do the former.
Reply
Old 08-01-2018 | 11:13 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Bombardier did this with the CRJ-200, delivering a 40 seat version so Delta could keep under the 50 seat scope. Later these were all converted to 50 seat versions. Just required paying Bombardier some $.
Reply
Old 08-02-2018 | 07:23 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
From: Professional Eugoogoolizer at the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can’t Read Good
Default

Why are we debating flying crap rjs... we should be hoping these crap planes wind up in the dessert so we're not flying people for crap wages..
Reply
Old 08-02-2018 | 10:29 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,880
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk
Bombardier did this with the CRJ-200, delivering a 40 seat version so Delta could keep under the 50 seat scope. Later these were all converted to 50 seat versions. Just required paying Bombardier some $.
Exactly and it was very little money per airframe. The same applies to the E175.
Reply
Old 08-02-2018 | 10:52 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MKUltra
Why are we debating flying crap rjs... we should be hoping these crap planes wind up in the dessert so we're not flying people for crap wages..
Yeah, because all of us will be flying 777’s to ABY. 🙄
Reply
Old 08-03-2018 | 04:24 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
From: Professional Eugoogoolizer at the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can’t Read Good
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk
Yeah, because all of us will be flying 777’s to ABY. 🙄
No.. but it should be mainline.. notus doing mainline flying for crap wages..
Reply
Old 08-17-2018 | 05:19 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Xjet is claiming they won the E175SC lottery.
Reply
Old 08-17-2018 | 07:23 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by calmwinds
Xjet is claiming they won the E175SC lottery.
Not quite. We are being told if we can get a contract done quickly we will get them. Used in the past, the difference this time is a specific contract (UAL), was mentioned. Also, I think management is panicking as attrition has gone off the charts. Fifty or so pilots hired away last week alone. I think it is finally dawning on them that this is not 2012.
Reply
Old 08-30-2018 | 09:56 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

Well, DO and the MEC claim it’s a done deal at XJT. It will get really ugly really fast if UAL pulls them back.
Reply
Old 09-01-2018 | 05:20 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk
Well, DO and the MEC claim it’s a done deal at XJT. It will get really ugly really fast if UAL pulls them back.
As far as Xjet, isn’t it really the only hope there has been for years? I would hate to see that hope crushed.

But, United hasn’t said anything to any of its other partners who bid yet —- particularly to GoJet whom is rumored as to losing the 700’s.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ClickClickBoom
SkyWest
10884
10-24-2018 08:02 PM
fenix1
Horizon Air
35
05-19-2018 02:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices