Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Can a regional run without long-term pilots >

Can a regional run without long-term pilots

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Can a regional run without long-term pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2019 | 04:33 AM
  #41  
majorpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Line holder
Default

Originally Posted by DiveAndDrive
I actually never indicated that a good PT score was an indication of a good leader.



I know and experienced that.



I was simply paraphrasing the article for those who didn’t read it. My point was just to not accept the bare minimum effort. How many times have you heard people saying anything greater than a 70% on a written is “x% working too hard”? I know it’s a joke, but still. Would you want a 70% pilot on your next deadhead? He can only keep the needle 70% centered on an approach down to minimums? He only has 70% of his memory items and limitations down?



As one of my military instructors said, “attention to detail, kicks de-tail”. I still say that to this day, and get quite a few crazy looks when I do. My examples above are pedantic. But humor me. What margin of error becomes acceptable? For me, it’s honestly just an internal struggle of constsntly trying to improve, and never accepting less than what I believe is my best. I’m not perfect. I mess up. I don’t sweat 0.02 or 0.03 X track. I’m not going to fish tail myself all over the sky just trying to get 0.00. But I STRIVE to be as CLOSE to perfect as possible. For me, I just enjoy the challenge. I enjoy maintaining my skills and trying to improve upon them. And my personal opinion is that that’s what separates amateurs from true professionals. Our companies and passengers expect professionals. And I have to agree with the statement that people with that mentality, either consciously or subliminally, portray themselves as such, and interviewers at the next level can pick up on that. But I could still be young, naive, and bright eyed and bushy tailed, so *

+1

Filler
Reply
Old 02-22-2019 | 02:17 PM
  #42  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,137
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by majorpilot
Then again, there are other fields for such individuals to advance. We’ve all worked for or seen the boss fixated on “always wearing a sharp suit” or the like. I wear a uniform and it always looks sharp; but I’ve found that leaders for whom that’s their main focus almost always lack needed critical basic leadership skills that are much more important than looks.
Yes, basic fitness (not SOF fitness) and military bearing should be a given for anyone who plans on going much further than E3. By no means is that the end all, be all. I got promoted by being smart, working hard, and having the luck to develop some critical skills and experiences early in the game before anyone knew they were going to be critical.

I did have a friend from way back who was always into fitness (as was I). He gained some media publicity for training for an iron-man while serving as the CO of ship on deployment. He would have the ship stop dead in the water so he (and only he) could swim laps around a destroyer for training. I found that to be odd and perhaps not appropriate, and I would have been uncomfortable with media coverage in any event. He ultimately came under indictment in the fat leonard business, so there might be a type of personality that manifests that way. But almost everyone I know who got command was fit, usually former athletes, probably reflects motivation and stamina (especially as you get older, gotta lead from the front).
Reply
Old 02-22-2019 | 02:41 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yes, basic fitness (not SOF fitness) and military bearing should be a given for anyone who plans on going much further than E3. By no means is that the end all, be all. I got promoted by being smart, working hard, and having the luck to develop some critical skills and experiences early in the game before anyone knew they were going to be critical.

I did have a friend from way back who was always into fitness (as was I). He gained some media publicity for training for an iron-man while serving as the CO of ship on deployment. He would have the ship stop dead in the water so he (and only he) could swim laps around a destroyer for training. I found that to be odd and perhaps not appropriate, and I would have been uncomfortable with media coverage in any event. He ultimately came under indictment in the fat leonard business, so there might be a type of personality that manifests that way. But almost everyone I know who got command was fit, usually former athletes, probably reflects motivation and stamina (especially as you get older, gotta lead from the front).
Like this O-6? I bet he got 100s on the PT test. He sure did have that drive you were talking about, the drive to find 14 year old boys. The Air Force selection board really hit it out of the ballpark with this one.


Last edited by TheWeatherman; 02-22-2019 at 03:20 PM.
Reply
Old 02-23-2019 | 06:38 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Default

How did a thread about regional lifers turn into a discussion about the volleyball scene from top gun?
Reply
Old 02-23-2019 | 06:58 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer
How did a thread about regional lifers turn into a discussion about the volleyball scene from top gun?
Reply
Old 02-23-2019 | 07:22 AM
  #46  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Default

So here’s an example. Regional with 1900 pilots. Seniority #100 hired 2014. Is that sustainable?
Reply
Old 02-23-2019 | 08:50 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 297
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
So here’s an example. Regional with 1900 pilots. Seniority #100 hired 2014. Is that sustainable?
You're asking the wrong questions. The real issue is can they keep up with attrition. Sure it's tough to keep instructors and LCAs from leaving, but that will never stop. If they can keep up with attrition and have a solid plan for instructor turnover, the juniority of the pilot group doesn't matter.
Reply
Old 02-23-2019 | 11:13 AM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by word302
You're asking the wrong questions. The real issue is can they keep up with attrition. Sure it's tough to keep instructors and LCAs from leaving, but that will never stop. If they can keep up with attrition and have a solid plan for instructor turnover, the juniority of the pilot group doesn't matter.
I took that post as regarding the general experience level of a pilot group that is so incredibly junior.
Reply
Old 02-23-2019 | 11:49 AM
  #49  
Flyboyxc91's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Captain CL-65
Default

Originally Posted by Approach1260
Well at least at PSA the absolute most Senior FO you'll fly with as a Captain will be right about 2 years. That's about the maximum time you can avoid the forced Senior Upgrade.

So the times of having an experienced FO in the right seat to catch a new Captains mistakes are well and truly over.

I've been on property for 3 years and that puts me in the top third of the company which is nuts when you think about it. I make sure to tell all my FO's to absolutely speak up and we'll help keep each other out of trouble. I know other new Captains though who like to lord their four bars over the new guys, and they convince these FO's to just sit there and shut up.

I understand you were probably trying to just say two years is about the longest you’ll sit in the right seat before transitions to the left.. however, being able to catch mistakes and be a good crew member in an operational and professional capacity is another matter NOT relating to just having to have 2 years before it’s acknowledged. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to tell the captain “we now need a T/O Alternate” , “we can’t descend like that in Canada, watch the altitude at XXX fix”, “Hey don’t you think we need to ask dispatch for a new alternate because I know you acknowledged it but it’s below the derived minimums”, “That runway is closed on the NOTAM when we get there”... I’m just saying I hate this type of statement because I’ve been very helpful some days and the captains appreciate it a lot when that’s the case I’ve found. I’m a one year FO at the airline, but my background also is in science and engineering so it’s the details that do matter and I believe in stayin engaged to the situations that are at hand... it’s not just “Captain *******” when dealing with a release or decision making, some FOs will say that but I think there are more than a few that strive for a more professional stance.


Happy Flying.
Reply
Old 02-23-2019 | 11:50 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 297
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Slow2Final
I took that post as regarding the general experience level of a pilot group that is so incredibly junior.
It's really nothing new. Smaller pilot groups have always been junior.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DCA A321 FO
American
373
08-18-2015 02:45 AM
Route66
American
6
04-08-2015 06:38 AM
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices