Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Best "real" flow to a major? >

Best "real" flow to a major?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Best "real" flow to a major?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2019 | 01:59 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip
No doubt SkyWest is a huge company. Maybe I’m wrong, just seemed really astounding to me. 125/month for a company with 4700 pilots. Legacies with 14,000 pilots on full tilt aren’t pushing those numbers.

Outpacing attrition by an average of 55/month is 660 additional pilots this year, bringing the total to 5360. Is there that much net growth at SkyWest?

I’m just having a hard time with the numbers. Then again, I don’t work there.
We lose about 5% of the seniority list every month at my airline. Even if SKW lost half that they’d still need to hire 110+ a month just to keep up with attrition.
Old 03-29-2019 | 02:01 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 297
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip
No doubt SkyWest is a huge company. Maybe I’m wrong, just seemed really astounding to me. 125/month for a company with 4700 pilots. Legacies with 14,000 pilots on full tilt aren’t pushing those numbers.

Outpacing attrition by an average of 55/month is 660 additional pilots this year, bringing the total to 5360. Is there that much net growth at SkyWest?

I’m just having a hard time with the numbers. Then again, I don’t work there.
We're already at 4900 pilots. Wouldn't surprise me if we hit 5300-5500 by the end of the year. We're constantly short-staffed as the company picks up slack for other regionals that can't staff. Legacies aren't losing many pilots to other carriers. American will need to come close to those numbers to keep up with attrition.
Old 03-29-2019 | 02:28 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheWeatherman
That's assuming all military pilots want to fly as a civilian when they get out. I knew many that didn't because they got well paying jobs when they got out due to their command experience and security clearance.
There have been RAND studies on this very topic.

https://www.rand.org/pubs/documented...ngs/DB118.html

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/ran...AND_RR1455.pdf
Old 03-29-2019 | 05:44 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Default

Speaking of flow, how does being part of an airline with a preferential hiring scheme affect one’s chances of being hired outside of such scheme? In other words, if someone wants to go to AA outside the flow, is he/she better off not going to a WO? Would someone willing to go to Delta better off not being at Endeavor? United/CPP?
Old 03-29-2019 | 06:00 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sigler
Speaking of flow, how does being part of an airline with a preferential hiring scheme affect one’s chances of being hired outside of such scheme? In other words, if someone wants to go to AA outside the flow, is he/she better off not going to a WO? Would someone willing to go to Delta better off not being at Endeavor? United/CPP?
AA hired an average of four WO pilots outside the flow each month in 2018, on top of the flows it took. Folks can and do get hired on at AA outside the flow.
Old 03-30-2019 | 11:50 AM
  #56  
ESQ702's Avatar
Fly or Die
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix21
That second study is very insightful (mainly because it is so much more recent than the first). Thx for posting.
Old 03-30-2019 | 12:55 PM
  #57  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by sigler
Speaking of flow, how does being part of an airline with a preferential hiring scheme affect one’s chances of being hired outside of such scheme? In other words, if someone wants to go to AA outside the flow, is he/she better off not going to a WO? Would someone willing to go to Delta better off not being at Endeavor? United/CPP?
Quite the opposite is actually true. AA has already stated they have a preference to WO pilots both with the flows and hiring WO pilots outside the flow. I know several hired at American outside the flow from my AAG regional.
Old 04-01-2019 | 01:26 AM
  #58  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sigler
Speaking of flow, how does being part of an airline with a preferential hiring scheme affect one’s chances of being hired outside of such scheme? In other words, if someone wants to go to AA outside the flow, is he/she better off not going to a WO? Would someone willing to go to Delta better off not being at Endeavor? United/CPP?
Depends on how much of a conspiracy theorist to whom you're talking is.

At Endeavor, if you pass the marks to get an OTS Delta interview, then you're probably in as good a shape as anyone to land the job there. If you can't get the interview OTS, well... there's a reason that it's called the DGI, not the DGJ. It doesn't mean that you can't pass the interview, but having Endeavor experience is far from a silver bullet.
Old 04-01-2019 | 12:23 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip
No doubt SkyWest is a huge company. Maybe I’m wrong, just seemed really astounding to me. 125/month for a company with 4700 pilots. Legacies with 14,000 pilots on full tilt aren’t pushing those numbers.

Outpacing attrition by an average of 55/month is 660 additional pilots this year, bringing the total to 5360. Is there that much net growth at SkyWest?

I’m just having a hard time with the numbers. Then again, I don’t work there.
I dont know much about SkyWest but it doesn't seem unlikely to me. If you cut SkyWest numbers in half you get roughly Envoy numbers. 2400 pilots with 750ish(+900 pilots in 2017) on average since 2016.

Regional airlines have a much higher attrition rate than mainline.
Old 04-01-2019 | 12:44 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Default

Here is my 2¢, pick an airline with CPP if you are just now getting into the 121 world. First, I know it’s not a true flow but you know whether you are accepted with in the first year. If United says no, jump over to a AA regional and wait the 8 years for the flow.(or go to a LCC or ACMI) The CPP programs are also much faster with most sending people in the 5 year mark consistently. Look at long term planning, if you make it to United in about 5 years you will be right at the beginning of their huge retirement wave. If you join an AA regional now and flow in 7-10 years you will be at the very back of their retirement wave. This difference in seniority at the major might be significant enough where if you go to AA you might never get the chance to upgrade, and if you do it will be in the last few years of your career. If you go to United right at the beginning of the hiring wave you will have a huge boost in seniority every year which will not only speed up the upgrade but will also help move into the widebody fleet of you so choose. Lastly is the other programs like DGI, I would steer clear of these as you have to wait years to find out your status of progression. At least with a CPP you know fast and can make adjustments if needed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyvector
Envoy Airlines
6966
06-18-2022 11:07 AM
Excargodog
Career Questions
6
03-07-2019 10:09 AM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
TallFlyer
Regional
53
10-19-2015 09:14 PM
JohnGardner
Regional
44
02-11-2014 06:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices