Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mrj 70/90

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2019, 07:17 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Shrinking a airframe almost always results in less efficiency and ultimently a market failure. Embraer and Mitsubishi went all in on scope caves by the major airlines. It did not happen and now they are trying to salvage something from the wreckage. That’s not likely to succeed either.
Change wing from aluminum to
Composite. Will save a lot of weight
msprj2 is offline  
Old 06-11-2019, 08:07 AM
  #112  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by msprj2 View Post
Change wing from aluminum to
Composite. Will save a lot of weight
That is much more harder than it sounds.

Weight savings matters to the customer, but a big part of the cost/benefit equation from the airframer's perspective is saved labor. The design/testing costs for a composite wing are about the same regardless of wing size. If you're going to build widebody wings, that's a lot of labor-work saved over the life of the project... not as much for an RJ. To get an ROI on saved labor you need to either build large wings (lots of spars, rivets, panels, holes drilled, etc) or build a whole lot of smaller wings... a niche RJ isn't going to provide that opportunity although you can bet your arse the next generation NB's (on both sides of the Atlantic) will have composite wings.

Also spending money to save weight is easier to justify for longer-range aircraft... once they get up to cruise the saved weight and smoother surface, and cruise-optimized wing shape amplifies into fuel savings over the duration of the flight. Widebodies (not coincidentally) are the primary market for composite wings now. Smaller planes which are up and down a lot don't get the same advantage, since they spend a lot of time in transition and on the ground. That costly, light, smooth composite wing is a liability at the gate and in the departure lineup at the hub.

You could do composite just to get to a specific weight goal, but that would likely be an economic fail. Better to just design your plane to be at the correct weight from day one. MHI was almost arrogant over the years in their disregard for US scope, and I for one am enjoying watching them squirm a bit (OK a lot). Message sent loud and clear.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-13-2019, 03:17 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Position: sideways
Posts: 294
Default

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/mitsubishi-revamps-its-regional-jet-as-it-aims-for-a-u-s-market-breakthrough/%3famp=1
C37AFE is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 06:41 AM
  #114  
Porco Rosso
 
ninerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Default

Huh. It's almost like Mitsubishi is making news for the sake of making news.

"We're buying the CRJ program! We're revamping our program! Holy bejesus, someone in the US wants to order our plane!"

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/06/19/airline-in-talks-to-buy-mitsubishi-spacejet-to-serve-us-regional-market.html
ninerdriver is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:59 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver View Post
Huh. It's almost like Mitsubishi is making news for the sake of making news.

"We're buying the CRJ program! We're revamping our program! Holy bejesus, someone in the US wants to order our plane!"

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/06/19/airline-in-talks-to-buy-mitsubishi-spacejet-to-serve-us-regional-market.html
It’s for the US market. That’s how we roll. Whoever has the biggest mouth wins.
msprj2 is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:13 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by msprj2 View Post
Change wing from aluminum to
Composite. Will save a lot of weight
That’s not actually true. Composites don’t scale down well and the weight savings becomes less as the airframe gets smaller. It would also mean several more years before they could get into production.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 07:52 AM
  #117  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 35
Default Mitsubishi CRJ

aaaaaand it’s official. Mitsubishi bought the CRJ program.
tgec is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 03:24 PM
  #118  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by tgec View Post
aaaaaand it’s official. Mitsubishi bought the CRJ program.
How will this effect the future of the CRJ? Will it be phased out in favor of the SpaceJet? The article says they will build the backlog but will they build any more past the 43 remaining? Interesting times we live in.
Pilotair is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 05:12 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotair View Post
How will this effect the future of the CRJ? Will it be phased out in favor of the SpaceJet? The article says they will build the backlog but will they build any more past the 43 remaining? Interesting times we live in.
If there is demand and they can make money, they will continue. What benefit not to?
pangolin is offline  
Old 06-26-2019, 05:26 AM
  #120  
Porco Rosso
 
ninerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotair View Post
How will this effect the future of the CRJ? Will it be phased out in favor of the SpaceJet? The article says they will build the backlog but will they build any more past the 43 remaining? Interesting times we live in.
The SpaceJet will get renamed to the ScopeJet. It will look a heck of a lot like a 900.
ninerdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Metering
Trans States Airlines
120
02-26-2018 09:37 PM
Skittles9E
Regional
70
07-27-2016 05:50 AM
tom11011
Trans States Airlines
105
02-26-2015 08:53 AM
mtsupilot376
Regional
0
07-15-2014 08:09 AM
trip
Regional
19
12-20-2012 05:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices