Mrj 70/90
04-25-2019, 09:28 AM
#11
Perennial Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,482
Originally Posted by vdawson
I don’t think that would qualify under any part of the CFR. Not 121, not 135 and not 91 or you would already see it on a smaller scale. No “ride share” for the FAA
04-25-2019, 09:41 AM
#13
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by Excargodog
Didn’t say it wouldn’t Be 121, just not codeshare with any legacy. For that matter it might BE Moxy. Nothing to stop a new 121 startup from having multiple aircraft types, both above and below current major scope requirements.
04-25-2019, 09:58 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
The crj550 whol fly about a year and fail when the bean counters see it's a failure and customers stop paying premium to flight in an rj longish distance...
Just order the a220 and get it over with.. enough of the 50 seaters.
Just order the a220 and get it over with.. enough of the 50 seaters.
04-25-2019, 02:54 PM
#15
Porco Rosso
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
The crj550 whol fly about a year and fail when the bean counters see it's a failure and customers stop paying premium to flight in an rj longish distance...
04-25-2019, 02:59 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
Originally Posted by ninerdriver
Tell that to folks who live near CVG or RDU... they pay big bucks to fly in RJs all over the country.
04-25-2019, 03:27 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Originally Posted by vdawson
You may have a point, but I’m thinking that since 121 means scheduled airline pre-selling tickets before determining the aircraft goes against a lot of the 121 regulations in place. I’m also assuming the FAA is unreasonable and will not cave on that position. Not a far fetched assumption I’m afraid.
04-25-2019, 05:28 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
The crj550 whol fly about a year and fail when the bean counters see it's a failure and customers stop paying premium to flight in an rj longish distance...
Just order the a220 and get it over with.. enough of the 50 seaters.
Just order the a220 and get it over with.. enough of the 50 seaters.
Delta seems to be leading the way with the 220 - that could have been a regional bird - but it's not.
04-25-2019, 06:39 PM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 920
Originally Posted by pangolin
The issue isn't the airframe. It's who flies it. Mainline is willing to let the airline get 100 seaters. But mainline flies them. Not regionals.
Delta seems to be leading the way with the 220 - that could have been a regional bird - but it's not.
Delta seems to be leading the way with the 220 - that could have been a regional bird - but it's not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
