Mrj 70/90
04-27-2019 | 06:32 PM
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
The MRJ70 is not yet built, it's planned to have 76 seats though to comply with current scope, expected in 2021. Both models will have around 2000 mile range.
https://www.latimes.com/business/la-...418-story.html
https://www.latimes.com/business/la-...418-story.html
04-28-2019 | 07:52 AM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: sideways
No one is forced to work anywhere
04-28-2019 | 09:42 AM
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
04-28-2019 | 11:21 AM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,879
Likes: 194
The MRJ70 is not yet built, it's planned to have 76 seats though to comply with current scope, expected in 2021. Both models will have around 2000 mile range.
https://www.latimes.com/business/la-...418-story.html
https://www.latimes.com/business/la-...418-story.html
04-28-2019 | 02:39 PM
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Let's see if United pilots can pull the 76 seater in house and put an end to all this.
04-28-2019 | 02:52 PM
#56
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Economically, it doesn't matter if it's heavier, as long as the fuel burn is good enough. Scope is still an issue of course.
04-28-2019 | 03:22 PM
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
04-28-2019 | 03:38 PM
#58
Banned
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
04-28-2019 | 08:02 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
No, you didn't.
A B scale is an entirely different issue. The regional model is nefarious in its own way as regional pilots traditionally voted to undercut other groups to get their flying. The shortage at hand has greatly helped prevent that, but the two things are different.
There are many areas to blame for the regional model and its continuity. While I agree that the way regional pilots have been paid (and still are when in direct comparison) is shameful, there is a lot to differentiate it from a B scale.
A B scale is an entirely different issue. The regional model is nefarious in its own way as regional pilots traditionally voted to undercut other groups to get their flying. The shortage at hand has greatly helped prevent that, but the two things are different.
There are many areas to blame for the regional model and its continuity. While I agree that the way regional pilots have been paid (and still are when in direct comparison) is shameful, there is a lot to differentiate it from a B scale.
04-28-2019 | 10:08 PM
#60
Banned
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
No, you didn't.
A B scale is an entirely different issue. The regional model is nefarious in its own way as regional pilots traditionally voted to undercut other groups to get their flying. The shortage at hand has greatly helped prevent that, but the two things are different.
There are many areas to blame for the regional model and its continuity. While I agree that the way regional pilots have been paid (and still are when in direct comparison) is shameful, there is a lot to differentiate it from a B scale.
A B scale is an entirely different issue. The regional model is nefarious in its own way as regional pilots traditionally voted to undercut other groups to get their flying. The shortage at hand has greatly helped prevent that, but the two things are different.
There are many areas to blame for the regional model and its continuity. While I agree that the way regional pilots have been paid (and still are when in direct comparison) is shameful, there is a lot to differentiate it from a B scale.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
