Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pilot Shortage: Real or Nah? >

Pilot Shortage: Real or Nah?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pilot Shortage: Real or Nah?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2019 | 04:21 PM
  #21  
Irishblackbird's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

No pilot shortage, but lots of movement. Some good observations, and theories, but what anyone has failed to mention is the effect of the economy going forward. One big economic downturn and all those retirements will be matched by downsizing of the industry, and pilot hiring will slow.
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 04:31 PM
  #22  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by UnprotectdPilot
To your point --

Everyone looks at the retirement numbers at the majors and says "Wow, there are over 30k retirements over the next decade with just over 20k regional pilots, everyone will have a job."

But.

How many U/LCCs pilots have their apps in? How many corporate or former airline pilots are joining the regionals now to prime their resumes with current 121 time for the legacies? How many Air Force, Navy, and Marine jet pilots are leaving each year to take those jobs?

There certainly is opportunity - it isn't stagnant by any means. However, it's just as competitive as ever.
I think most everyone with a clean record and well-rounded app will be able to move beyond a regional if that's their goal, but you may have to settle along the way.
Granted, there are pilots willing to move on that’s not at the LCCs, but those numbers don’t include growth. 1%, 2%, or even 3% growth will require about 40K-55K in hiring (retirement + growth). Food for thought
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 04:48 PM
  #23  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,248
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by SaturnV
Which Legacy has captains costing 50% more than LCC Captains? I’m guessing Southwest and JetBlue are the two main LCC and they both pay 12 year captains ~$270/hr vs. The Legacies paying ~$285/hr for the same equipment.

Maybe 1,500 out of 15,000 at any given Legacy are WB Captains costing 30% more than LCC Captains but still not 50% more. The majority of Legacy captains cost about 5% more over LCC captains if we are just talking straight pay scales.

I’m not trying to be pedantic, just seemed like 50% was way too large of an over reach.
Not talking straight payscales, talking what they are actually paying. Take Spirit. They’ve basically only been a player since 2007 and really didn’t start expanding until 2014. Very few of their pilots have anything like 12 years seniority. Yeah, their 12 year pay might not differ that much from that of Delta or United, but damn few of their captains and even fewer FOs are at those lofty seniority levels. JetBlue too. Their major expansion started about 2010.

Lots of pilots with very little time at the company mean reduced crew costs. A Delta 20 year captain and 12 year FO cost ( counting 401k) well over $500 an hour to fly a 320. Spirit with a five year captain and a 3 year FO costs about $350 an hour to fly the same equipment.

A newly hired crew is a cheap crew.
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 05:13 PM
  #24  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Not talking straight payscales, talking what they are actually paying. Take Spirit. They’ve basically only been a player since 2007 and really didn’t start expanding until 2014. Very few of their pilots have anything like 12 years seniority. Yeah, their 12 year pay might not differ that much from that of Delta or United, but damn few of their captains and even fewer FOs are at those lofty seniority levels. JetBlue too. Their major expansion started about 2010.

Lots of pilots with very little time at the company mean reduced crew costs. A Delta 20 year captain and 12 year FO cost ( counting 401k) well over $500 an hour to fly a 320. Spirit with a five year captain and a 3 year FO costs about $350 an hour to fly the same equipment.

A newly hired crew is a cheap crew.
I referenced Southwest and JetBlue because you said LCC 12 year captains cost 50% less than 12 year Legacy captains. Spirit is considered a ULCC like you mentioned in your first post so I know you know the difference.

I’m talking about your statement of LCC Captains costing 50% less. SWA is 40 years old and JetBlue is 20 years old plenty of the captains are on year 12 pay. 401k contribution is the same at JetBlue and Southwest too. So same ~$500/hr to operate the 320 or 737.

Also, almost 1/3 (4,000/14,000) of Delta’s pilots have only been on the seniority list for 5 years or less. Newly hired crew as you call it.

As a former CPZ brother (correct me if I’m wrong) I’m not trying to bust your chops on this or be THAT guy. I just wanted to point out LCC’s like SWA and JB don’t have captains out here flying around at a 50% discount compared to our legacy counterparts. That’s all.

Last edited by SaturnV; 07-09-2019 at 05:45 PM.
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 05:40 PM
  #25  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,248
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by SaturnV
I referenced Southwest and JetBlue because you said LCC 12 year captains cost 50% less than 12 year Legacy captains. Spirit is considered a ULCC like you mentioned in your first post so I know you know the difference.

I’m talking about your statement of LCC Captains costing 50% less. SWA is 40 years old and JetBlue is 20 years old plenty of the captains are on year 12 pay. 401k contribution is the same at JetBlue and Southwest too. So same ~$500/hr to operate the 320 or 737.

Also, almost 1/3 (4,000/14,000) of Delta’s pilots have only been on the seniority list for 5 years or less. Newly hired crew as you call it.

As a former CPZ brother (correct me if I’m wrong) I’m not trying to bust your chops on this or be THAT guy. I just wanted to point out LCC’s like SWA and JB don’t have captains out here flying around at a 50% discount compared to our legacy counterparts. That’s all.
I’ll concede that I wasn’t thinking SWA, more JB, Spirit, Frontier, and soon to be Moxy-whatever.

But my point was that the new (and newly expanding) airlines do CURRENTLY enjoy an advantage and that while yes, they have some junior people on board, as the upcoming retirement wave demonstrates, they’ve had a lot of pilots that have been in the top of the payscales for a long long time. And yeah, 50% was undoubtedly a little hyperbole.

Not criticizing anyone, just looking at the demographics and the resulting economics. And ten years from now most of the legacies will have a far less senior demographic, precisely because of those retirees. Read a business article a few years ago about the effect of the increase in retirement age from 60 to 65. One of the things it did was rather dramatically increase the average longevity (and hence the average personnel costs) since almost all those retained were super senior.

The savings in training costs by having people work five years longer were a blip compared to the increase in personnel costs that the increased seniority cost.

The accountants at management no doubt read the same article. Which is why, I believe, they are just as happy to keep flows and preference programs as slow as they believe they can. Your opinion may vary....
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 05:50 PM
  #26  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
I’ll concede that I wasn’t thinking SWA, more JB, Spirit, Frontier, and soon to be Moxy-whatever.

But my point was that the new (and newly expanding) airlines do CURRENTLY enjoy an advantage and that while yes, they have some junior people on board, as the upcoming retirement wave demonstrates, they’ve had a lot of pilots that have been in the top of the payscales for a long long time. And yeah, 50% was undoubtedly a little hyperbole.

Not criticizing anyone, just looking at the demographics and the resulting economics. And ten years from now most of the legacies will have a far less senior demographic, precisely because of those retirees. Read a business article a few years ago about the effect of the increase in retirement age from 60 to 65. One of the things it did was rather dramatically increase the average longevity (and hence the average personnel costs) since almost all those retained were super senior.

The savings in training costs by having people work five years longer were a blip compared to the increase in personnel costs that the increased seniority cost.

The accountants at management no doubt read the same article. Which is why, I believe, they are just as happy to keep flows and preference programs as slow as they believe they can. Your opinion may vary....
No big deal, it’s pretty common for people to lump SWA with the Legacies and JB with the ULCC. But I’d say, between the two of them, they are the only true LCC in the US (even though Delta is probably the only airline that consistently comes close to matching the product at JetBlue). Neither is a legacy or an ULCC.

JB was lagging while waiting on a contract but now that one is in place the payscale and retirements are identical to SWA and about 3-5% behind the legacies operating the same equipment. We will be continuing to work to close that small gap that the legacies currently have on us.
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 10:00 PM
  #27  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SaturnV
Which Legacy has captains costing 50% more than LCC Captains? I’m guessing Southwest and JetBlue are the two main LCC and they both pay 12 year captains ~$270/hr vs. The Legacies paying ~$285/hr for the same equipment.

Maybe 1,500 out of 15,000 at any given Legacy are WB Captains costing 30% more than LCC Captains but still not 50% more. The majority of Legacy captains cost about 5% more over LCC captains if we are just talking straight pay scales.

I’m not trying to be pedantic, just seemed like 50% was way too large of an over reach.
Bonus points for using the word “pedantic”. Didn’t know what it meant, looked it up, turns out I might be a pedant. Also, I think you’re being a tiny bit pedantic. But I’m glad. Because I learned something from the ensuing discussion.

Last edited by SwampFoxx; 07-09-2019 at 10:30 PM.
Reply
Old 07-09-2019 | 10:18 PM
  #28  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

By the way, nice dialogue SaturnV and excargodog. I mean that sincerely. If everyone on the forum could parley back and forth without things escalating out of control while showing sound logic and conceding points when need be... why, the world would be a better place. Well done.
Reply
Old 07-10-2019 | 12:43 AM
  #29  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SwampFoxx
By the way, nice dialogue SaturnV and excargodog. I mean that sincerely. If everyone on the forum could parley back and forth without things escalating out of control while showing sound logic and conceding points when need be... why, the world would be a better place. Well done.
Shut the **** up.

Sorry, it was getting a little too un-APC for a minute.
Reply
Old 07-10-2019 | 04:56 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SwampFoxx
By the way, nice dialogue SaturnV and excargodog. I mean that sincerely. If everyone on the forum could parley back and forth without things escalating out of control while showing sound logic and conceding points when need be... why, the world would be a better place. Well done.
Amem brother.

Why does everyone have to be so snarky? Thanks for keeping it civil guys.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ShyGuy
Career Questions
44
02-03-2021 09:00 PM
Jetstream 823JS
PSA Airlines
157
03-21-2016 02:53 PM
PROFILE CLIMB
Flight Schools and Training
73
08-19-2015 03:12 PM
Cujo665
Regional
51
10-05-2014 01:09 PM
KAVU
Regional
4
03-08-2014 05:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices