Rejected by Envoy and Mesa
#11
I went through my application (AirlineApp) and for the question that asked “Are you eligible for an ATP or rATP per 61.159 or 61.160” I answered “no” because I don’t have 1500 hours yet, maybe that hit them the wrong way and I was supposed to say I am eligible? You’d think they would have asked that though to clarify
#12
Banned
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
I went through my application (AirlineApp) and for the question that asked “Are you eligible for an ATP or rATP per 61.159 or 61.160” I answered “no” because I don’t have 1500 hours yet, maybe that hit them the wrong way and I was supposed to say I am eligible? You’d think they would have asked that though to clarify
Also, if you have a social media presence at all, spend some time cleaning it up. Anything they can find is fair game - including years old social media posts, etc.
#13
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I went through my application (AirlineApp) and for the question that asked “Are you eligible for an ATP or rATP per 61.159 or 61.160” I answered “no” because I don’t have 1500 hours yet, maybe that hit them the wrong way and I was supposed to say I am eligible? You’d think they would have asked that though to clarify
That can't be it.If it was, they wouldn't have interviewed you.
They know you don't have 1500 hours.
They interview people with less than 1500 hours all the time, and give them a class date when they get there.
#14
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
But very valid point for the majors especially.
#15
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
In a sense I’m not eligible because I don’t have 1500 just yet, but I will be eligible. Just wasn’t sure what the question was really asking.
Thing is, when you check Yes it brings up a list of hour requirements. 1500 for the unrestricted, 1250 with an aviation degree, 750 for military, etc.
Still don’t know and I would think someone would have clarified that
Last edited by jimpix89; 01-23-2020 at 01:19 PM.
#18
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
That's the thing. In this climate they would have asked to clarify almost anything.
SIDA disqualifying crimes or a very adverse reference check are about the only things I can think of where the likes of mesa would just pass on you with no questions asked. I know as fact of one guy who was told they couldn't hire him with his drug conviction but they'd hold a class date for him if he could it expunged quickly enough (he did, and is now a legacy CA).
Envoy is quite a bit more selective due to flow, in the old days I would say expect to fail an Envoy (Eagle) interview and be pleasantly surprised if get beyond a CJO. They had enough time do some research so that could have been anything, including social media, that easy catch you fumbled in the HS state finals, how you part your hair (them dallas boys are funny that way...)
SIDA disqualifying crimes or a very adverse reference check are about the only things I can think of where the likes of mesa would just pass on you with no questions asked. I know as fact of one guy who was told they couldn't hire him with his drug conviction but they'd hold a class date for him if he could it expunged quickly enough (he did, and is now a legacy CA).
Envoy is quite a bit more selective due to flow, in the old days I would say expect to fail an Envoy (Eagle) interview and be pleasantly surprised if get beyond a CJO. They had enough time do some research so that could have been anything, including social media, that easy catch you fumbled in the HS state finals, how you part your hair (them dallas boys are funny that way...)
#19
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
That's the thing. In this climate they would have asked to clarify almost anything.
SIDA disqualifying crimes or a very adverse reference check are about the only things I can think of where the likes of mesa would just pass on you with no questions asked. I know as fact of one guy who was told they couldn't hire him with his drug conviction but they'd hold a class date for him if he could it expunged quickly enough (he did, and is now a legacy CA).
Envoy is quite a bit more selective due to flow, in the old days I would say expect to fail an Envoy (Eagle) interview and be pleasantly surprised if get beyond a CJO. They has enough time do some research so that could have been anything, including how you part you're hair (them dallas boys are funny that way...)
SIDA disqualifying crimes or a very adverse reference check are about the only things I can think of where the likes of mesa would just pass on you with no questions asked. I know as fact of one guy who was told they couldn't hire him with his drug conviction but they'd hold a class date for him if he could it expunged quickly enough (he did, and is now a legacy CA).
Envoy is quite a bit more selective due to flow, in the old days I would say expect to fail an Envoy (Eagle) interview and be pleasantly surprised if get beyond a CJO. They has enough time do some research so that could have been anything, including how you part you're hair (them dallas boys are funny that way...)
It couldn’t be a disqualifying crime (I have none) because Envoy ran the background and said I’m eligible to apply in 6 months.
Mesa is weird though. No explanation for that unless their HR just doesn’t have it together.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
I’m thinking social media as well. Anything else they could have just asked especially Mesa I don’t think we turn down well qualified candidates for no reason. I post political things all the time but every few weeks go back and delete anything that could even potentially offend someone. Plus I keep it locked down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



