Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Future of United Express >

Future of United Express

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Future of United Express

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2020, 04:15 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
So what's your opinion on ALPA airlines voting in concessionary contracts to take airplanes from other carriers for growth? That kind of pattern bargaining is like, totally ok, but only because they are fellow union bros?

I'm actually a hardcore pro-union guy, but it's sad seeing all of the new guys in this industry get brainwashed by ALPA. ALPA has accomplished very little when it comes to improving pilot compensation and career stability in the past four decades. They have a laundry list of pay scale losses, pension program losses, and scope erosions that outweigh any "hard fought gains" they may have had on their resume at one time. Merger policy for seniority integration is also fairly weak.

Until ALPA mainline and regional pilots stand side by side and demand 1 contract and 1 seniority list for all pilots, few will treat them like the "super union" that they self-proclaim to be.
I often see the popular opinion that PSA’s contract was concessionary. It gave us SAP. The absolute best quality of life tool in the entire industry, bar none. And it gave us our critical pay language which at the time (pre-company reserve grid manipulation and pre-arbitration) allowed line-holding pilots to regularly credit 125-145 hours /month. Effectively making our airline some of the highest paid regional pilots anywhere at that time. But hey, let’s not have details that matter get in the way.

Regarding SkyWest, they are a scourge to unionized labor. You don’t really even have a contract per se. Can’t your company change your compensation without it even going to the pilots for a vote?
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 06:56 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,090
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
I often see the popular opinion that PSA’s contract was concessionary. It gave us SAP. The absolute best quality of life tool in the entire industry, bar none. And it gave us our critical pay language which at the time (pre-company reserve grid manipulation and pre-arbitration) allowed line-holding pilots to regularly credit 125-145 hours /month. Effectively making our airline some of the highest paid regional pilots anywhere at that time. But hey, let’s not have details that matter get in the way.
Getting schedule flexibility and premium pay rules in exchange for lower pay rates and more jets from another carrier is not leading the industry forward. When the **** hits the fan, the premium pay dries up, and the good schedules go away, that still leaves you with the lower pay rates. And nothing else to show for it. Spin it how ever you want, PSA took concessions.

Regarding SkyWest, they are a scourge to unionized labor. You don’t really even have a contract per se. Can’t your company change your compensation without it even going to the pilots for a vote?
This sounds like some mindless ALPA rhetoric being regurgitated without a fact check. SkyWest has a legally recognized pilot agreement. Any reduction in pay rates must go to a vote.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 08:35 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 692
Default

I wonder what’s going to happen to Mesa through all of this? United loves them. They can be so proud that they have ALPA on the property. It has done very little for them.
sflpilot is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 08:48 AM
  #34  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
So what's your opinion on ALPA airlines voting in concessionary contracts to take airplanes from other carriers for growth? That kind of pattern bargaining is like, totally ok, but only because they are fellow union bros?

I'm actually a hardcore pro-union guy, but it's sad seeing all of the new guys in this industry get brainwashed by ALPA. ALPA has accomplished very little when it comes to improving pilot compensation and career stability in the past four decades. They have a laundry list of pay scale losses, pension program losses, and scope erosions that outweigh any "hard fought gains" they may have had on their resume at one time. Merger policy for seniority integration is also fairly weak.
It's no coincidence that four decades coincides with deregulation. That was the whole point, to break the non-competitive entitlement of established airlines, and that included the entitlement of their unions.


Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Until ALPA mainline and regional pilots stand side by side and demand 1 contract and 1 seniority list for all pilots, few will treat them like the "super union" that they self-proclaim to be.
It will have to happen at mainline, regionals (by design) have no leverage.

But it's a very steep uphill battle... mainline pilots who came from regionals sympathize, but after slogging our way up the ladder we're not in any mood to make concessions so other people don't have to pay dues. I don't mind if you somehow skip your dues, as long as I'm not the one paying for it (I already paid). Make no mistake, any move to bring regional flying -in-house would require heavy concessions on the part of major pilots.

Major pilots who didn't come from regionals have no sympathy at all.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 12:10 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
Default

Originally Posted by sflpilot View Post
I wonder what’s going to happen to Mesa through all of this? United loves them. They can be so proud that they have ALPA on the property. It has done very little for them.
I heard United didn't like them bc of performance metrics...hard to say who they do or don't like. Although I'm most inclined to think it will come down to who can fly for the cheapest.
GA2Jets is offline  
Old 07-01-2020, 03:10 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,090
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
It's no coincidence that four decades coincides with deregulation. That was the whole point, to break the non-competitive entitlement of established airlines, and that included the entitlement of their unions.
No coincidence, correct, however SWA seems to have 4 decades of consistent, measurable contract improvements in the same time period, which is also no coincidence. SWA has guppy captains earning what legacy wide-body captains do without having to wait 25-30 years to get to it.

It will have to happen at mainline, regionals (by design) have no leverage.
Agreed, but it will never happen because of what you say below.

But it's a very steep uphill battle... mainline pilots who came from regionals sympathize, but after slogging our way up the ladder we're not in any mood to make concessions so other people don't have to pay dues. I don't mind if you somehow skip your dues, as long as I'm not the one paying for it (I already paid). Make no mistake, any move to bring regional flying -in-house would require heavy concessions on the part of major pilots.
It would be an epic uphill battle, but the amount of job security it would provide would be significant. In situations like this Wu-Flu scenario the guys getting furloughed would be the new fresh-out-of-flight-instructing, small-jet-driving, pilot at the bottom who are less likely to have kids, less likely to have a house payment, more likely to still be living in mom's basement, etc instead of the guys right now who are about to get dumped from mainline who are now in their late 30s, their 40s, or older who are more likely to have kids in school, mortgages, debt incurred from jumping from regional to mainline, etc etc.

As for people not paying dues, for the most part every kid getting hired at XYZ regional has paid some dues to get there, even if their legacy-captain parent paid for their ratings, they've still busted their butt and put in the work. Do their dues outweigh yours or mine? probably not, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't make this career better for pilots.

Major pilots who didn't come from regionals have no sympathy at all.
Which is why major pilots who did pay dues ought to educate these direct entry major pilots (but won't) and fixing this system would fix the apathy/ego problem as well (idealistic scenario, but unrealistic).

But as you said, few mainline pilots have a desire to fix the issue if it will cost them a single cent to extend the ladder to help out the guys below them or to stand in solidarity with them. And because unions without solidarity are weak, that tells you all you need to know about ALPA. The only people with the power to change the way it works, have already "gotten theirs," so they won't lift a finger.

Ultimately I'm wasting my keystrokes here, as this industry will continue to eat its young until there are no young left before it considers a change.

Last edited by threeighteen; 07-01-2020 at 03:33 PM.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 07-02-2020, 06:56 AM
  #37  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
No coincidence, correct, however SWA seems to have 4 decades of consistent, measurable contract improvements in the same time period, which is also no coincidence. SWA has guppy captains earning what legacy wide-body captains do without having to wait 25-30 years to get to it.
Unique business model at the time (since copied), and they were well-prepared to grow post de-regulation because they were already up and operating.

Their model took off, and they capitalized after every down-turn so they could never plausibly ask their pilots for concessions (for a long time their corporate culture would have made that unpalatable anyway).

But I remember when SWA was not the preferred career-destination, that came about after 9/11 when the big boys went BK or suffered heavy concessions. Last man standing.

SWA is the poster-child for why de-regulation was a success.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-06-2020, 02:43 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mrfishy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 147
Default

XJT company email says they’re doing 5000 block in August compared to the 30k they were planning for. Nail in the coffin if I’ve ever heard it.
mrfishy is offline  
Old 07-06-2020, 04:12 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
moonraker9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 376
Default

Originally Posted by mrfishy View Post
XJT company email says they’re doing 5000 block in August compared to the 30k they were planning for. Nail in the coffin if I’ve ever heard it.
Did someone else get that flying or is United reducing the schedule again?
moonraker9 is offline  
Old 07-06-2020, 04:36 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mrfishy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by moonraker9 View Post
Did someone else get that flying or is United reducing the schedule again?
unsure. XJT is operating 16% of the expected flying. Other UAX carriers are doing 50%+.
mrfishy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
3
10-18-2018 10:46 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
APC225
United
24
11-27-2013 05:49 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices