![]() |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 3167755)
The maturity of political ideology of the youth as they age has been going on for years... before self created social media bubbles. I worry the formula has changed.
The danger is entitlements associated with those taxes.. it's VERY hard to roll back entitlements. |
Sooooo, who thinks props are going to make a come back? I sure hope they do.
|
Glad we’re back to aviation. I doubt the mainline feeding carriers will go back to props. Mostly based on customer experience, not that there’s anything wrong with a turboprop.
Originally Posted by alaskadrifter
(Post 3168071)
Sooooo, who thinks props are going to make a come back? I sure hope they do.
|
Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
(Post 3168096)
Glad we’re back to aviation. I doubt the mainline feeding carriers will go back to props. Mostly based on customer experience, not that there’s anything wrong with a turboprop.
A. A remarkably good product with a noticeably better cabin. Quieter than a jet, WiFi, ample bin space, more legroom, etc. B. Savvy marketing. Highlight why it’s better from a pax perspective than a tired -200 or 145. Make people excited to fly on it. Shoot, just getting rid of a few seats and adding a snack station turned an ancient 70 seater into a 50 seater people are excited to fly on. Also harp on it being better for the environment. You could probably hook a lot of younger travelers who have never set foot in a turboprop before and don’t have the associated bad memories. Plenty of wealthy people float around in Kingairs and Pilatuses- the stigma can be overcome. |
Originally Posted by alaskadrifter
(Post 3168071)
Sooooo, who thinks props are going to make a come back? I sure hope they do.
If the US population were....smarter?....yes. When “regionals” quit doing ATL-HOU type of legs or when small, Class D airspace-type airports start losing flights, maybe they’ll wake up and happily accept a Q, an ATR, OR, now this was in 2019, a German company was reviving the Do328. |
If it's cheaper, people will buy the ticket. They will make clever to them jokes about it as they board or will make disparaging remarks on facebook about having to ride on an "old prop". But the consumer has shown price point is really all they think about when booking a fight.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 3168127)
If it's cheaper, people will buy the ticket. They will make clever to them jokes about it as they board or will make disparaging remarks on facebook about having to ride on an "old prop". But the consumer has shown price point is really all they think about when booking a fight.
|
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3168097)
I think you’d need
A. A remarkably good product with a noticeably better cabin. Quieter than a jet, WiFi, ample bin space, more legroom, etc. B. Savvy marketing. Highlight why it’s better from a pax perspective than a tired -200 or 145. Make people excited to fly on it. Shoot, just getting rid of a few seats and adding a snack station turned an ancient 70 seater into a 50 seater people are excited to fly on. Also harp on it being better for the environment. You could probably hook a lot of younger travelers who have never set foot in a turboprop before and don’t have the associated bad memories. Plenty of wealthy people float around in Kingairs and Pilatuses- the stigma can be overcome. |
Antonov’s with WiFi and a keurig in the back. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.
|
Originally Posted by PhxJester
(Post 3168246)
Antonov’s with WiFi and a keurig in the back. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.
http://www.warbirdalley.com/images/AN2-Colt-1.jpg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands