![]() |
Originally Posted by Approach1260
(Post 3301248)
Unfortunately this is a question that really only you can answer. For what it's worth though I don't think either option is necessarily a bad one, it's just pros and cons. Yes and just trying to gather some insight that I may have possibly not thought of ! thanks !
What I would say though is that if you want to retire in 13 years, my advice would be the LCC route. 10-13 years at a low cost carrier will get you much more seniority and quality of life than 10 years at AA after waiting to flow will. I'm definitely leaning that way. If you're really on the fence I'd say to turn down the 30 grand, and then if you wind up flowing anyway you'll still get the 70 grand on your last paycheck. thanks for the input |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3301176)
I beg to differ. The number of pilots leaving above me outside of the flow has accelerated compared to pre-Covid.
my comparison is 2022 actual attrition vs 2022 alternate universe no-bonus attrition. The people who are most strongly incentivized to stay are the ones closest to flow. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3301317)
this is a bit of a “how many angels can dance on the head of a pin question”
my comparison is 2022 actual attrition vs 2022 alternate universe no-bonus attrition. The people who are most strongly incentivized to stay are the ones closest to flow. Anecdotally it seems that it's mostly just free money for those who planned to stay anyway. Then again attrition always shows down the closer you get to flow. |
Originally Posted by Approach1260
(Post 3301324)
Yeah it would be interesting to see the numbers on how many people who were otherwise planning to leave are now staying because of the money.
Anecdotally it seems that it's mostly just free money for those who planned to stay anyway. Then again attrition always shows down the closer you get to flow. |
Originally Posted by eligible2flow
(Post 3301339)
It should be 0 unless they can't do math
It's definitely easier to get hired than it has in the past, but with the way airline hiring goes you could be fully qualified and get nothing but thanks but no thanks without any explanation. |
Originally Posted by Approach1260
(Post 3301366)
I do think it's funny how suddenly so many pilots are acting like major airlines are hammering down their doors begging them to come fly for them.
It's definitely easier to get hired than it has in the past, but with the way airline hiring goes you could be fully qualified and get nothing but thanks but no thanks without any explanation. |
Originally Posted by eligible2flow
(Post 3301369)
You said I wonder how many are staying rather than leaving, implying there are people turning down job offers or pulling apps out.
|
Originally Posted by Approach1260
(Post 3301392)
No I meant how many who were never planning to wait for the flow were convinced to stay. If someone has a job offer at a major they should definitely say no to this.
|
Originally Posted by mketch11
(Post 3301602)
The extra money has nothing to do with it.
Guess we'll see how it plays out, and fairly quickly too, would be my guess. |
Originally Posted by Slow2Final
(Post 3301681)
That's why so many of us are scratching our heads at their choice of throwing a bunch of money at this retention problem. Not that those who are going to AA don't want it, but those who are trying to get out, generally don't care about a theoretical bonus years down the road, as opposed to seniority and money at another airline NOW.
Guess we'll see how it plays out, and fairly quickly too, would be my guess. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:47 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands