Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional airlines want to axe 1500 hour rule >

Regional airlines want to axe 1500 hour rule

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional airlines want to axe 1500 hour rule

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2021 | 05:43 PM
  #141  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,126
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
1500 hours isn’t a arbitrary number, that was always required for the ATP. The difference was now that all operating crew members of a Part 121 flight must now hold a ATP and a PIC type-rating in the aircraft. Not a just a commercial ticket for those not operating in a non-PIC role.
Yes, we've kind of been having a circular argument about why an ATP is required to crew Air Transport operations.

The "1500 hour" rule actually added some exceptions to the old ATP rules (ie R-ATP).

So maybe the discussion should be how low can we go with R-ATP exceptions and under what circumstances? Unless anybody really thinks a 200 hour CPL from a 141 flight school really belongs in a passenger jet?
Reply
Old 10-06-2021 | 05:59 PM
  #142  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 102
From: Whale FO
Default

The problem with the whole ATP rule is, that it assumes Riddle grads are somehow more qualified with their R-ATPs than pilots with 135 IFR experience, where the opposite is true. It was just a great lobbying effort from the flight school industry.

There should be credit for 135 operation. It makes the 121 transition easy.
Reply
Old 10-06-2021 | 06:00 PM
  #143  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yes, we've kind of been having a circular argument about why an ATP is required to crew Air Transport operations.

The "1500 hour" rule actually added some exceptions to the old ATP rules (ie R-ATP).

So maybe the discussion should be how low can we go with R-ATP exceptions and under what circumstances? Unless anybody really thinks a 200 hour CPL from a 141 flight school really belongs in a passenger jet?
Thats a discussion that can be had, but folks need to stop saying that 1500 is a Arbitrary number that was recently added which it isn’t. R-ATP numbers, sure let’s discuss
Reply
Old 10-06-2021 | 06:57 PM
  #144  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
Essential is going to throw a hussy fit when I say this:
There is no substitute for experience.
No doubt you improved, we all did.
My gripe is with the time number which in itself is meaningless of you don’t require experience as the two are not equal.
Complexity makes a better pilot,
Not flying the same hour a hundred times over.
As long as there is no experience complexity requirement the 1500 is meaningless and nothing but a feel good.
TSA looking for water bottles.
I will ask this and I’ll preface it by saying this is coming from someone who’s not a pilot. What’s the idea in having the R-ATP for 1000 and 1200 hour guys? I can see it for military guys as those people get the best training under the most severe scenarios. However, what’s the difference in someone going to say Liberty University and getting a degree in aviation and only needing 1000 hours compared to someone who goes to basket weaving U and then getting top notch training from a former fighter pilot as his CFI as compared to some young kid from Riddle just trying to get his hours and get out? For this reason alone I’m looking at Liberty University to save 500 hours needed.
Reply
Old 10-06-2021 | 07:10 PM
  #145  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by tsimmns927
I will ask this and I’ll preface it by saying this is coming from someone who’s not a pilot. What’s the idea in having the R-ATP for 1000 and 1200 hour guys? I can see it for military guys as those people get the best training under the most severe scenarios. However, what’s the difference in someone going to say Liberty University and getting a degree in aviation and only needing 1000 hours compared to someone who goes to basket weaving U and then getting top notch training from a former fighter pilot as his CFI as compared to some young kid from Riddle just trying to get his hours and get out? For this reason alone I’m looking at Liberty University to save 500 hours needed.
and that’s what is so brilliant about these R-ATP programs. Instead of getting 500 hours you get to pay extra tuition. And they get to advertise stuff like “get there first - seniority matters”

Amazing lobbying.
Reply
Old 10-06-2021 | 08:34 PM
  #146  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

So if they do axe the 1500 hour rule, what happens with all the people who are already near atp mins? It wouldn't be fair a 2t0 hour guy can go to the airlines, while the 1300 hour guy worked his way to build the time.
Reply
Old 10-06-2021 | 08:37 PM
  #147  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 4
From: MD-88 FO
Default

Originally Posted by RandomPilotDude
So if they do axe the 1500 hour rule, what happens with all the people who are already near atp mins? It wouldn't be fair a 2t0 hour guy can go to the airlines, while the 1300 hour guy worked his way to build the time.
Cause, you know, life is known for being fair.
Reply
Old 10-07-2021 | 03:39 AM
  #148  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 500
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Myfingershurt
Cause, you know, life is known for being fair.
what?!? Inconceivable!
Reply
Old 10-07-2021 | 04:06 AM
  #149  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by tsimmns927
I will ask this and I’ll preface it by saying this is coming from someone who’s not a pilot. What’s the idea in having the R-ATP for 1000 and 1200 hour guys? I can see it for military guys as those people get the best training under the most severe scenarios. However, what’s the difference in someone going to say Liberty University and getting a degree in aviation and only needing 1000 hours compared to someone who goes to basket weaving U and then getting top notch training from a former fighter pilot as his CFI as compared to some young kid from Riddle just trying to get his hours and get out? For this reason alone I’m looking at Liberty University to save 500 hours needed.
As a previous R-ATP person who joined the regionals at 1000 hours. Best guess would be because of the structured training and in depth course work from Day 1 of school until degree certification vs the unstructured Part 61 training and lack of in-depth course work in that training environment. There is a big difference both environments. Is the course additional work worth the additional tuition expenses, no they are not.
Reply
Old 10-07-2021 | 05:09 AM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

If anyone should be crying about hours requirements it should be the small mom and pops charter companies.

They need a 1200 hour pilot to fly their pax in IFR.

By the time someone has built 1200 hours, they might as well just keep doing what they’re doing to get 300 more.

Not to mention, we were just discussing if 1500 hours is safe for someone to be an airline pilot.

In the 135 world you might be flying old, piston airplanes with limited capabilities. No extra engine to rely on. You’re MUCH more likely to have a mechanical emergency. You don’t have a dispatcher or ground crew for support. You don’t have a cabin crew or copilot for support. In the regional world you’ll fly the same approaches all the time. In 135 you’re likely going somewhere new most days. As the pilot shortage continues I don’t think many small scale 135’s will stay in business.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
172 Captain
Regional
35
12-14-2012 08:30 AM
aafurloughee
Fractional
41
06-25-2008 06:43 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices