Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional airlines want to axe 1500 hour rule >

Regional airlines want to axe 1500 hour rule

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional airlines want to axe 1500 hour rule

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2021, 11:26 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Not to be a pain but how much do you know about “Airline training” in Europe?
https://www.pilotcareernews.com/blac...avia-training/
The MPL program mentioned in this article is 22(!) months. Then it’s right seat 737.
Thats a far cry from a Part 61 3-months Commercial then right seat Regionals.
Same number of hours.
You tell me if there’s a difference.
I’m not sure I follow. My point is that a Cessna 207 single pilot operation is in no way comparable to a crewed jetliner operation. I’m not talking about experience, but rather I’m pointing out that the poster’s comparison is completely invalid.
Wilfortina is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 02:58 PM
  #112  
New Hire
 
Airline Safety's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 8
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Not to be a pain but how much do you know about “Airline training” in Europe?
https://www.pilotcareernews.com/blac...avia-training/
The MPL program mentioned in this article is 22(!) months. Then it’s right seat 737.
Thats a far cry from a Part 61 3-months Commercial then right seat Regionals.
Same number of hours.
You tell me if there’s a difference.
I used to teach in an EASA MPL program for a European LCC.

The washout rate is more than 50%, students pay their own training. The actual timeline is 3-4 years. A majority of students end up with several training failures and restarts. It's not pretty.
Airline Safety is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 04:06 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer View Post
You know it’s not the same as 121. Different requirements on almost every single level. Please don’t play stupid.
135 commuter air carrier is only "one level" below 121, in many cases, they run more complex operations with many more airplanes, staff, etc. There are some pretty small 121 operations out there. If you want to be grouping "airlines" though, it's best to specify, since airline and air carrier are words that can easily contain both parts, based on all the requirements they meet and the service they provide. There are lot more of these options (both small 121 and large 135) than many people know about. Yes, many 135 operators with two-crew operations/environments, FOs, etc. For the larger aircraft, many of the requirements are the same or very similar. 121 goes into more depth in most cases, but not all. If one is looking at airliner fatalities, why wouldn't we consider all scheduled operations?
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 05:36 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
135 commuter air carrier is only "one level" below 121, in many cases, they run more complex operations with many more airplanes, staff, etc. There are some pretty small 121 operations out there. If you want to be grouping "airlines" though, it's best to specify, since airline and air carrier are words that can easily contain both parts, based on all the requirements they meet and the service they provide. There are lot more of these options (both small 121 and large 135) than many people know about. Yes, many 135 operators with two-crew operations/environments, FOs, etc. For the larger aircraft, many of the requirements are the same or very similar. 121 goes into more depth in most cases, but not all. If one is looking at airliner fatalities, why wouldn't we consider all scheduled operations?
Because they’re not at all comparable. You’re comparing piston singles to jetliners.
Wilfortina is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 09:10 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by Wilfortina View Post
Because they’re not at all comparable. You’re comparing piston singles to jetliners.
So what kind of airplane do you have to fly to be an "airline"? Where is that written down? Many, probably over half, of the commuter (scheduled) operations are turboprop and/or multi-engine and/or multi-crew operations. The single-pilot piston stuff mainly on-demand. Air carrier is what I'm talking about.

So my question is, why wouldn't you consider all of the air carrier fatalities for the accident rate? If you are going to limit to 121, that's fine, just say "121".
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 01:09 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DocMcFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: E-175 FO
Posts: 112
Default

This thread is about “Regional Airlines” and axing the “1500 Hour Rule” (which doesn’t exist for part 135). It should be self evident that we are trying to discuss only the 121 world.
DocMcFly is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 04:21 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
Default

The 1,500 hour rule was pretty arbitrary, but at the same time it forces new pilots to get experience flying outside of a training environment. Those hours of flying without a flight instructor next to you is where you really build your Aeronautical Decision Making, and you probably make some bad calls that you get to learn from because of the lower stakes involved. Especially since these days a new hire is likely to be a Captain within two years at a regional, I do think those extra hours really make a difference.
Approach1260 is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 04:23 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
So what kind of airplane do you have to fly to be an "airline"? Where is that written down? Many, probably over half, of the commuter (scheduled) operations are turboprop and/or multi-engine and/or multi-crew operations. The single-pilot piston stuff mainly on-demand. Air carrier is what I'm talking about.

So my question is, why wouldn't you consider all of the air carrier fatalities for the accident rate? If you are going to limit to 121, that's fine, just say "121".
FAR 61.160 is what we are discussing in this thread, and it only applies to certain operations. It appears you would like to have a discussion about something else, which is confusing the rest of us.
Wilfortina is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 04:29 AM
  #119  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,796
Default

Originally Posted by DocMcFly View Post
This thread is about “Regional Airlines” and axing the “1500 Hour Rule” (which doesn’t exist for part 135). It should be self evident that we are trying to discuss only the 121 world.

Doesn't 135 still require a minimum of 1200TT? Seems like that's what I remember from my check hauling days before I could be assigned an IFR run.
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 10-06-2021, 06:28 AM
  #120  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,086
Default

Originally Posted by Approach1260 View Post
The 1,500 hour rule was pretty arbitrary, but at the same time it forces new pilots to get experience flying outside of a training environment. Those hours of flying without a flight instructor next to you is where you really build your Aeronautical Decision Making, and you probably make some bad calls that you get to learn from because of the lower stakes involved. Especially since these days a new hire is likely to be a Captain within two years at a regional, I do think those extra hours really make a difference.
Thats a very idealistic view.
Especially since there’s no requirement for those hours to be anything but drilling holes in the sky.
I know of people that bought their own clapped out Cherokee 140 because they didn’t want to flight instruct.
Look at all the shared time building threads on this forum. Safety pilot “PIC” what a joke.
So you think another 400 hrs in your uncle’s Arrow and 400 hrs of banner towing and 400 hrs of flight instruction magically makes you the better pilot?

Let’s say 0-CFI at a 141 school then 1200 hrs of flight instruction at same school:
Designated practice area’s, assigned cross countries, canned stage checks.
1500 hrs and a ATP-ME and you’ve literally not been out of State.

That’s why a numerical threshold doesn’t mean anything.
Period.
TiredSoul is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
172 Captain
Regional
35
12-14-2012 08:30 AM
aafurloughee
Fractional
41
06-25-2008 06:43 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices