Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

50 seat contraction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2021, 09:03 PM
  #21  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,943
Default

Agreed there are a few with every regional that are unhireable at any other regional, LCC, or major. Not wanting to commute, skeletons in the closet, etc. But most will get on with another carrier when push comes to shove. This is an amazing time. I cannot recall anything like it in the last half a century, since the dawn of the jet age.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 02:50 AM
  #22  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
I cannot recall anything like it in the last half a century, since the dawn of the jet age.
just for giggles, there was a time in the 60’s when the majors were hiring guys with wet commercials. Like 250 hr straight to the cockpit of a jet… course it was sitting sideways
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 04:54 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
It was years ago that I left.

But I still know people, that know people at one of those carriers. There were many who simply didn't/weren't able to move on. Many, for obvious reasons, un-hirable or simply didn't want to put in the work And that's on them....

On a side note, it's comical that the "contraction" of 50 seats jets (in this case) ISN'T due to their aged out airframes, inefficiency, level of discomfort/customer dissatisfaction, what have you....

....it's a lack of pilots.
There is definitely a lack of pilots wanting to enter the field. Some don’t want to do the work, some aren’t willing to put in the time it takes to get to a career company, while others won’t do it without a guaranteed outcome or defined timeframe. That is a problem, however the contraction of the 50 seat aircraft is also largely influenced by consumer demand and scope. Managers like Kirby would love to retire all of the 50 seaters and replace them with brand new 175’s and mainline aircraft where appropriate, but they can’t. The decision for the industry to shrink the 50 seaters is just as much influenced by scope, an aging fleet with no replacements, and customer complaints about a garbage product as it is a shortage of pilots. With increasing demand and limited airport capacity, the only way to meet that demand is with larger aircraft. Being that scope is maxed out, as gauge increases, the legacies grow and the regionals shrink.
Hedley is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 05:54 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 241
Default

Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
flightlessbirds is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 06:04 AM
  #25  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds View Post
Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
true true unrelated

they can’t staff the planes they have right now so the least profitable routes get triaged

and yes he could fill more 76 seaters… but not from MLU-IAH
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 06:10 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds View Post
Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
I thought for sure that he would follow Delta’s lead with the A220 coming out of the pandemic. It would have offered a great product for small to medium markets, given UAX up to 70 more 175’s, and facilitated the elimination of the single class 50 seaters. The brand would be greatly improved. He went a different route. Instead of a SNB, he ordered hundreds of max/neo’s, got no additional 175’s, and the single class 50 seaters are still going to be mostly phased out. I’m glad that the United pilots dug in their heels on scope. It forced Kirby’s hand and it turns out that he picked higher paying aircraft over a SNB. I guess time will tell which company picked the right path.
Hedley is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 06:23 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 241
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
I thought for sure that he would follow Delta’s lead with the A220 coming out of the pandemic. It would have offered a great product for small to medium markets, given UAX up to 70 more 175’s, and facilitated the elimination of the single class 50 seaters. The brand would be greatly improved. He went a different route. Instead of a SNB, he ordered hundreds of max/neo’s, got no additional 175’s, and the single class 50 seaters are still going to be mostly phased out. I’m glad that the United pilots dug in their heels on scope. It forced Kirby’s hand and it turns out that he picked higher paying aircraft over a SNB. I guess time will tell which company picked the right path.
Agreed. I hope it works well. Though UA (and many others) has had history of doing poorly when they allow their feed to atrophy.

One of the things Kirby did very well when he came from AA that really put UA back in the game as OM was leading the company was to dramatically expand the network with all those old 50 seaters over the pretty strenuous market/wall street and customer objections. I truly hope that this currrent upgauging results in continued improved connectivity and is not just being driven by a CASM - only perspective. UAs strength is their network. Shrinkage in domestic network connectivity isn't what I'd be betting on out of the pandemic.
flightlessbirds is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 08:09 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
I thought for sure that he would follow Delta’s lead with the A220 coming out of the pandemic. It would have offered a great product for small to medium markets, given UAX up to 70 more 175’s, and facilitated the elimination of the single class 50 seaters. The brand would be greatly improved. He went a different route. Instead of a SNB, he ordered hundreds of max/neo’s, got no additional 175’s, and the single class 50 seaters are still going to be mostly phased out. I’m glad that the United pilots dug in their heels on scope. It forced Kirby’s hand and it turns out that he picked higher paying aircraft over a SNB. I guess time will tell which company picked the right path.
we will never find out but I bet he got the MAX for less than he would have gotten the 220. I wouldn’t be surprised if the cost per ASM are a lot lower on the MAX with low cost of capital, fleet commonality etc. but offer a lot more flexibility.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 09:52 AM
  #29  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,943
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT View Post
just for giggles, there was a time in the 60’s when the majors were hiring guys with wet commercials. Like 250 hr straight to the cockpit of a jet… course it was sitting sideways
Yep, and more than half a century ago. Even before that, the jump seat was used for training and observing. Simulator, what’s a simulator? They did not exist.

My first time in a simulator was in the late 1960s.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 11-20-2021, 10:05 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
There is definitely a lack of pilots wanting to enter the field. Some don’t want to do the work, some aren’t willing to put in the time it takes to get to a career company, while others won’t do it without a guaranteed outcome or defined timeframe. That is a problem, however the contraction of the 50 seat aircraft is also largely influenced by consumer demand and scope. Managers like Kirby would love to retire all of the 50 seaters and replace them with brand new 175’s and mainline aircraft where appropriate, but they can’t. The decision for the industry to shrink the 50 seaters is just as much influenced by scope, an aging fleet with no replacements, and customer complaints about a garbage product as it is a shortage of pilots. With increasing demand and limited airport capacity, the only way to meet that demand is with larger aircraft. Being that scope is maxed out, as gauge increases, the legacies grow and the regionals shrink.
Yep, well aware of all that.......

I guess I should have clarified and included "in this case, Kirby is blaming it on...."

Or, what the guy below say VVVVVVVV

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds View Post
Kirby is blaming the pilots rather than accept the consequences of his decision to not buy a SNB fleet. That unlocks the scope everyone says he wants. Sure he wants it, but only if someone else is paying for it.
Originally Posted by ZeroTT View Post
true true unrelated

they can’t staff the planes they have right now so the least profitable routes get triaged

and yes he could fill more 76 seaters… but not from MLU-IAH
True, as a great example.

There were a few places where only the 50 seater made sense and could get in/out of. And I believe the marketing/revenue department exploited the crap out of those markets fare wise.
John Carr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
timeless
Regional
21
11-24-2015 07:40 AM
duvie
United
6
07-31-2015 08:07 AM
Wildmanny
Cargo
150
10-17-2014 07:13 AM
Max Glide
Regional
41
04-16-2009 07:17 AM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
1
11-18-2005 08:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices