SKW SAPA President
#41
I mean no offense; I would love to see a “National Pay Scale” or “National Min Rate” for seat configs. But our national problems go far beyond that.
#43
No offense taken my friend, the first brews would be on me at the RON. What has happened in the last few years is in the past; all we as pilots can hope to do is educate ourselves on the circumstances and consequences of the past, and effect positive change on the future.
#44
I definitely see the need for a bonified union at SKW, but not ALPA.
ALPA serves in this order:
1. Themselves
2. Large Carriers
3. Small Carriers
ALPA at regionals is a conflict of interest. Higher pay scales on our end translate to higher costs for the majors which is not benificial for the legacy pilots that are still waiting for financial health in their airlines. Nobody is perfect, certainly not ALPA, but in this case its easy to see why they don't do much for regionals. Prater seems like a legitimate guy albeit still a politician. He, like most elected representatives, serves the interests of the financial majority. Not only do the five ALPA legacy carriers make up almost 25,000 ALPA members (which is almost twice that all the ALPA carriers that fly 70 seat and under) but those guys on average make at least twice what we do. Its not hard to see why ALPA will serve their interests before ours.
ALPA serves in this order:
1. Themselves
2. Large Carriers
3. Small Carriers
ALPA at regionals is a conflict of interest. Higher pay scales on our end translate to higher costs for the majors which is not benificial for the legacy pilots that are still waiting for financial health in their airlines. Nobody is perfect, certainly not ALPA, but in this case its easy to see why they don't do much for regionals. Prater seems like a legitimate guy albeit still a politician. He, like most elected representatives, serves the interests of the financial majority. Not only do the five ALPA legacy carriers make up almost 25,000 ALPA members (which is almost twice that all the ALPA carriers that fly 70 seat and under) but those guys on average make at least twice what we do. Its not hard to see why ALPA will serve their interests before ours.
#45
ok then why wont skw give you a legal binding contract? thats all you need, you dont need a major overhaul, just a contract and maybe some better benefits and some other changes but thats what alpa will do for you to start. after that you as a pilot group can decide what you want
#46
Higher wages at the regionals mean it would no longer be financially viable for the mainline to outsource flying. The mainline would expand and create new, better jobs with narrowbody aircraft while the regionals would shrink...but that shouldn't cause any loss of jobs due to attrition at the shrinking regionals from their pilots taking jobs at the growing mainline.
Isn't that what we all want - more mainline jobs? Growing regionals don't make mainline jobs...
Isn't that what we all want - more mainline jobs? Growing regionals don't make mainline jobs...
#47
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
I think that a union at SkyWest is a dumb thought 1300 pilots ago. Now that we are darn near 2700 strong, Bessie in Crew Support does not know my name. Dan in dispatch has no clue who I am. Therefore, when I do them a favor, they have no obligation to me, in reality, I have no clue who they are either.
SkyWest is too big to operate on a "mah-and-pah" platform. The company has outgrown its skill set. I think we need an organized, set-in-stone contract that spells out exactly when Bessie and Dan can contact me and what we both get when they do.
I truly dig the vendors who have contracts with SkyWest. I am a provider of Pilot Services: I don't get a contract, but Pepsi and Coke do? What kind of crap is that? If Pepsi doesn't fulfill the requirements, you replace them with Coke, right?
Replace me, SkyWest.
SkyWest is too big to operate on a "mah-and-pah" platform. The company has outgrown its skill set. I think we need an organized, set-in-stone contract that spells out exactly when Bessie and Dan can contact me and what we both get when they do.
I truly dig the vendors who have contracts with SkyWest. I am a provider of Pilot Services: I don't get a contract, but Pepsi and Coke do? What kind of crap is that? If Pepsi doesn't fulfill the requirements, you replace them with Coke, right?
Replace me, SkyWest.
Be careful what you ask for though. Some of the favors both sides enjoy will be gone as soon as everything is by the book.
#48
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
I definitely see the need for a bonified union at SKW, but not ALPA.
ALPA serves in this order:
1. Themselves
2. Large Carriers
3. Small Carriers
ALPA at regionals is a conflict of interest. Higher pay scales on our end translate to higher costs for the majors which is not benificial for the legacy pilots that are still waiting for financial health in their airlines. Nobody is perfect, certainly not ALPA, but in this case its easy to see why they don't do much for regionals. Prater seems like a legitimate guy albeit still a politician. He, like most elected representatives, serves the interests of the financial majority. Not only do the five ALPA legacy carriers make up almost 25,000 ALPA members (which is almost twice that all the ALPA carriers that fly 70 seat and under) but those guys on average make at least twice what we do. Its not hard to see why ALPA will serve their interests before ours.
ALPA serves in this order:
1. Themselves
2. Large Carriers
3. Small Carriers
ALPA at regionals is a conflict of interest. Higher pay scales on our end translate to higher costs for the majors which is not benificial for the legacy pilots that are still waiting for financial health in their airlines. Nobody is perfect, certainly not ALPA, but in this case its easy to see why they don't do much for regionals. Prater seems like a legitimate guy albeit still a politician. He, like most elected representatives, serves the interests of the financial majority. Not only do the five ALPA legacy carriers make up almost 25,000 ALPA members (which is almost twice that all the ALPA carriers that fly 70 seat and under) but those guys on average make at least twice what we do. Its not hard to see why ALPA will serve their interests before ours.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



