Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Lobbying to roll back 1500 hr rule: >

Lobbying to roll back 1500 hr rule:

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lobbying to roll back 1500 hr rule:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2022 | 10:25 AM
  #111  
Crjdeuce's Avatar
Max Days Off
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 142
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by herewego
Except Operational Performance Bonuses have been in the $50-$75 range per quarter lately while the Financial Performance Bonuses are effectively over since Skywest is no longer making a profit and is not forecast to do so for the near future.
Pilot Profit Share payout is only guaranteed through this year, and was on the negotiating block to be terminated the last package for FO's. Only left in place after overwhelming rejection of the first attempt by management to cut real pay, while appearing to increase pay.
Not sure if you listened to the last earnings call but skywest was profitable first quarter of 2022. They have the money to pay us, this next pay raise better be substantial.
Reply
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:17 AM
  #112  
rjbusdriver's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 103
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Practically no one is making only that there... Also it goes from $47/hr to $52/hr after the first year. In addition there are bonuses and profit sharing...

From APC:
"Pilot Profit Share Payout Program for all pilots, paid bi-annually. Additional Operational Performance Bonuses for pilots after 1 year at SkyWest and Financial Performance Bonuses for pilots after 2 years at SkyWest, paid quarterly."
Correction, if you’re waiting for IOE you are most certainly stuck on that minimum monthly guarantee. Don’t ask me how I know..
Reply
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:55 AM
  #113  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 969
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by DontLookDown
ALL part 141 approved universities are going to put out graduates who can fly to ACS standards AND be well versed in ground knowledge and theory.

SOME part 61 students will also have comparative ground knowledge.

Other part 61 students will simply memorize Sheppard air and pass their written with a 90% or higher. Then they will memorize the ASA oral exam guidebook at best. Alternatively, they will memorize a 1 page printout of checkride gouge detailing exactly what questions to expect on the oral. They might pass their checkride with flying colors despite having a very thin layer of knowledge


Both part 141 and 61 can pass the same checkride and still not be equal.
Taught both part 61 and part 141. Part 61 churns out better pilots. Tailored training for each students needs versus a canned approach that is never truly perfect for anyone.
Reply
Old 05-12-2022 | 12:40 PM
  #114  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,578
Likes: 337
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

Don’t forget that for many Part 91 corporate operations, experience requirements may be based on insurance requirements.
Reply
Old 05-12-2022 | 04:04 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by terks43
Taught both part 61 and part 141. Part 61 churns out better pilots. Tailored training for each students needs versus a canned approach that is never truly perfect for anyone.
I disagree. I also have experience with both.

Part 141 is also tailored to the individual. Yes, you need to make sure you do every part of the lesson and do the lessons in order. Once that is taken care of however, you keep repeating the necessary items until the student gets it.
Reply
Old 05-12-2022 | 06:10 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by terks43
Taught both part 61 and part 141. Part 61 churns out better pilots. Tailored training for each students needs versus a canned approach that is never truly perfect for anyone.
Man, I'll jump in here. Taught both. Flown with guys from both. This is a bit of over generalization because there's a lot of other things going on too besides where you learned to fly by the time you show up at a regional. I think Part 61 turns out better stick and rudder guys that can also think through and reason through stuff on their own. But 141 turns out pilots better suited for the procedural approach of sitting right seat in a regional airline and learning how to think through and reason through problems in the way their airline wants them to. Both are fine in the long run but from the left seat, I find it much easier to PF with a part 141 types and easier to PM with a part 61 types. The more time they have with the airline, the more time their prior experience doesn't matter.
Reply
Old 05-12-2022 | 06:12 PM
  #117  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rjbusdriver
Correction, if you’re waiting for IOE you are most certainly stuck on that minimum monthly guarantee. Don’t ask me how I know..
I gave up on sitting around and waiting for nothing to happen. Got a second job to supplement that income
Reply
Old 05-12-2022 | 08:44 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: Retired NJA & AA
Default

Flight 3407 Families are already pushing back on Republic's request:

https://youtu.be/AhS68t3Rk4A
Reply
Old 05-13-2022 | 02:49 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear
Flight 3407 Families are already pushing back on Republic's request:

https://youtu.be/AhS68t3Rk4A
Then here comes age 67 or 68.
Reply
Old 05-13-2022 | 03:31 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Then here comes age 67 or 68.
Factor in all the early COVID retirements, all the people who run into medical issues in their 60s and all the others who don’t want to work past 65…. And you aren’t left with too many people.

Also, it wouldn’t fix the problem. Most pilots that old are at Majors or Legacy airlines.

The shortage is regional captains and LCA.

The only thing that would possibly put a dent in the problem is if you created a “Restricted 1st Class” medical allowing people older then 65 to still fly part 121 in aircraft with less than 80 seats (or something like that).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brown
Major
115
12-27-2007 07:47 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
185
06-04-2007 05:39 AM
Express pilot
Regional
1
02-22-2007 12:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices