AVIATE don’t join !
#91
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
#93
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
Roe v Wade protected the right to choose and even the states that didn’t like it couldn’t prevent it from happening until a challenge to that ruling had SCOTUS reversing the 50 year old decision and decided it wasn’t a constitutional issue and therefore states were left to decide on it.
But that’s not a jury or state government “nullifying” a decision, as you say. That was a formal challenge that SCOTUS had to address and decide whether or not the constitution applied to a case. Do you have examples of where a state or jury outright decided a SCOTUS decision to be wrong and then went ahead and did their own thing, like violating 4th amendment rights of someone?
#94
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Look up the Fugitive Slave Act.
#95
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 191
From: 787 FO
So this union hating pilot (?) knows better than the last 150 years of case law of the most successful democratic capitalist country on earth. Meanwhile, he subscribes to a libertarian cult's philosophy adopted by no country on earth. To say he and the other Austrian School adherents are in desperate need of a feedback loop is an understatement to say the least. Cuckoo, cuckoo!
#96
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
So this union hating pilot (?) knows better than the last 150 years of case law of the most successful democratic capitalist country on earth. Meanwhile, he subscribes to a libertarian cult's philosophy adopted by no country on earth. To say he and the other Austrian School adherents are in desperate need of a feedback loop is an understatement to say the least. Cuckoo, cuckoo!
#97
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 191
From: 787 FO
By all means give us some examples to prove your points from the last century or successful economies in the world that adhere to the 'Austrian School of Economics'. Otherwise, admit that your philosophies are simply not reality-based.
#98
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 105
From: Whale FO
Ah, you meant successful. sorry. Does not exist

#99
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
#100
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Historically the first 10 Amendments (known as the Bill of "Rights") never applied to the state governments, only the federal governments. Most state constitutions are more restrictive of their own governments than the federal Constitution is restrictive of the federal government. In the late 1800s and early 1900s the SCOTUS began making stuff up such as the Incorporation Doctrine which it then started applying the 10 Amendments onto the state governments. There are books written about this by Raul Berger, Tom Woods, and Forrest McDonald if you want to learn more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



