Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Its Official, NO ALPA at COLGAN!!!!!! >

Its Official, NO ALPA at COLGAN!!!!!!

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Its Official, NO ALPA at COLGAN!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2007, 11:49 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Blkflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Cessna 152 Captain
Posts: 695
Default

Originally Posted by belliott View Post
I think that you and many others have and will mis-interpret my post... Please read it as such.... I am very wary of working for an airline that does not have a contract in place... I am very wary of Colgan specifically after reading what people have stated about the company...

25-30% of the guys interviewed were offered recently at Colgan so don't think it's a walk-in.

I was one of 94 for my current job.... and although I do not work for a 121 carrier I can say that having this fail by 4 votes makes me very suspicious.... Let me lay my background out on the table... I meet or exceed Colgans minimum requirements.... I currently fly weather mod.... I don't do anything that I feel is unsafe and I am not pressured into anything.... I do not want to put my QOL in jeopardy by moving or commuting halfway across the country for a job.... my current salary is equivalent to that of a fourth year Air Wisky CA (without per diem and expecting to fly 1000 hours a year).... I like what I do and unless a job presents itself that allows me to continue with my current QOL I do not wish to deviate from this path I have chosen.

you fly 10-12 legs a day low altitude/icing/IMC with 10 minute turnaround times and you'll be called up occasionally to do a mx trip after a long day.

Personally... and this is my opinion.... I think Colgan pilots are paid way to freaking little for what they do.... in fact I think this is great experience for you and anyone else who chooses to work for Colgan. Good for you (stated with nothing but best intentions)! One of my former roommates works for Colgan on the SF340 and he loves it.... good for him.

No I have not been there or done what you have. I don't expect the "oh so glamorous RJ job" without working darned hard for it. I am extremely sharp when it comes to flying because my life depends on it. I am not married but think that there is more to life than for the first airline that offers you an interview. I want a life that agrees with my goals. I want to work to live....not live to work. I do not want the pressure to fly a Part 91 MX flight after working a full day because I don't have a contract.

I have spoken my mind as the Constitution of this great nation allows myself and you to do.... and that is all it is.... my opinion. We all have a path to chose in aviation and I hope nothing but the best for you in your endeavors.

I live in a rodeo.... its called WX Mod.... and I hate ballets.

PEACE.
Why explain yourself.. I just hope they get Paid Decent Rates for the Qs

To make a comment on flying low in IMC and Icing conditions I say Hats off to them, just remember There are Bold pilots and Old Pilots but No OLD BOLD pilots.. Its not about SJS But about having someone in your corner when your back is up against the wall, Sure Alpa may not be the way but Colgan Pilots really need representation...
Blkflyer is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 12:00 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Back in school.
Posts: 580
Default

That is all I was trying to get across... no representation is something that I disagree with.

As far as explaining myself I feel that as a young pilot my compatriots are selling themselves short by not instructing or taking jobs that would otherwise enable them to gain experience outside of flying for an airline.

I think that posting anonymously (sp) is abused by those who do not have any REAL experience outside of their training grounds. I just hope that people realize that pilots in general are being abused (for the most part) and that pilots are making sub par wages.

I want the conditions for FA's and pilots to improve but do not anyone to sell themself short for the sake of their CEO's who line their pockets with the fruits of OUR labor.
belliott is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 12:43 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: ERJ FO
Posts: 1,276
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
Ask any RAH pilot with at least 3 years longevity what their opinion is of Gene Sowell and you'll likely be proven wrong...
Originally Posted by btwissel View Post
clearly you've never been a teamster
What these two said....
SharkyBN584 is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 08:01 AM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
batman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: BE-1900 CA
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by N618FT View Post
batman what have YOU personally done to increase the standard?
I voted.

And whats this about "just take out the beech guys.." do we not count? Our quality of life is just as important. You haven't been at a base like mine for over a year, working my schedule- so don't bother.
batman is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 08:12 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
batman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: BE-1900 CA
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by N618FT View Post
And you know it all because youve been there and done that right? ALPA's the solution for everything -- especially a small turboprop operation? PLEASE Not to mention if you take out the B1900 and the guys that havent worked for the company in a while, you're left with a couple guys that picked a bad base and a quarter of the original complaints. No, it's not the oh-so-glamorous RJ flying... you fly 10-12 legs a day low altitude/icing/IMC with 10 minute turnaround times and you'll be called up occasionally to do a mx trip after a long day. It's tough and it's NOT an easy way into the industry. Some people want that -- some people don't have families that they have to support. For the ones that do, it's going to be ROUGH. I've got me myself and I to worry about. If you can make any interviews, do it... it'll sharpen your skills. 25-30% of the guys interviewed were offered recently at Colgan so don't think it's a walk-in. Remember... this is a SMALL TURBOPROP CARRIER... take it AS THAT... if you want easy uneventful flying at flight levels, stay away. It keeps getting compared to everything else in the industry... well right now there aren't many other companies that do this per-se... just don't come into a rodeo expecting ballet.
Sorry, but we are not a small turbo prop operator. Have you checked our fleet size lately? This isn't Big Sky or Great Lakes anymore.
And you talk like you've been on the line for a while and really done these things.. where are you based?
I wonder what percentage of guys are hired with over 1000hrs here anymore? I had the hookup and I needed 1000/300 haha.

N618FT, if Colgan works for you, then great. But don't forget about everyone else- that's all we are saying. Good luck... and if you are in training here, dont skimp on SAAB systems- I hear they are a biatch.
batman is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 08:17 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
batman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: BE-1900 CA
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by Blkflyer View Post
Why explain yourself.. I just hope they get Paid Decent Rates for the Qs
I think the Beech Captain pay is part of our problem. We need higher 2nd year FO pay on the Q400, maybe like 35an hour or so. Beech Capt is around 34. I would like to see 60 first year on the Dash and makes both seats in the new plane very senior and very coveted. Maybe a Dash FO can transition to SAAB CA and hold that for a year before senoirity can dictate holding the Dash.
But.. with so many street captains on the way- does seniority even matter?
batman is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:52 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N2rotation's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: XJT furloughed due to non-ALPA undercutting
Posts: 376
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by N618FT View Post
Remember... this is a SMALL TURBOPROP CARRIER... take it AS THAT...
You used to be a small carrier until Pinnacle bought you those 74 seat regional AIRLINERS. Flying a glass cockpit into and out of Newark isn't what Colgan used to be... this is the real stuff now.

You have to agree that the wages set for the Q400 are too low. And because you guys AREN'T DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT, this is why pilots at companies with good contracts (XJT) will still look down on Colgan. I'm not sitting on any high horse, but I am just sorry to say that you've got half of the pilot group who thinks that it is professional to work more for less, undercutting pilots who have a professional contract. Why would anyone think it's cool to fly larger aircraft for less moneythan other Continental Express carriers?

Good luck!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
bbd_947833_Q400_lr.jpg (42.2 KB, 93 views)
N2rotation is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 10:08 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by N618FT View Post
Remember... this is a SMALL TURBOPROP CARRIER... take it AS THAT... if you want easy uneventful flying at flight levels, stay away. It keeps getting compared to everything else in the industry... well right now there aren't many other companies that do this per-se... just don't come into a rodeo expecting ballet.
Your about 9 months behind reality. Colgan is on the verge of becoming a large regional, ask management themselves 800-1000 pilots by 2009. Including options 55+ Q's. Like it or not Colgan pilots should be compared to everyone else now, because they are in the same whipsaw boat, get it yet cowboy? If you want to think less of yourself then go for it, Skybus is hiring BTW.

Oh and guess who represented Colgan at the NMB yesterday, MF and Buddy Casey from PINNACLE, not Mike. Buddy will most likely be your new CEO in the near future so you may want to get to know him. For example, he used to work with Frank Lorenzo, know who that is? If not you will sure learn the hard way.
MudPupppy is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 01:12 PM
  #49  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Exclamation

Originally Posted by N618FT View Post
And you know it all because youve been there and done that right? ALPA's the solution for everything -- especially a small turboprop operation? PLEASE Not to mention if you take out the B1900 and the guys that havent worked for the company in a while, you're left with a couple guys that picked a bad base and a quarter of the original complaints. No, it's not the oh-so-glamorous RJ flying... you fly 10-12 legs a day low altitude/icing/IMC with 10 minute turnaround times and you'll be called up occasionally to do a mx trip after a long day. It's tough and it's NOT an easy way into the industry. Some people want that -- some people don't have families that they have to support. For the ones that do, it's going to be ROUGH. I've got me myself and I to worry about. If you can make any interviews, do it... it'll sharpen your skills. 25-30% of the guys interviewed were offered recently at Colgan so don't think it's a walk-in. Remember... this is a SMALL TURBOPROP CARRIER... take it AS THAT... if you want easy uneventful flying at flight levels, stay away. It keeps getting compared to everything else in the industry... well right now there aren't many other companies that do this per-se... just don't come into a rodeo expecting ballet.




Yeah your right, In and out of Mexico between mountains higher than your a/c can climb (due to your pack being MEL'd Im sure), complex destinations, complex airspace, and glass, we have it so easy, get a clue, ABE-IAD all day and everyday is a walk in the park compared to some of the places I have been, get off it, you work at one of the least respected airlines out there, thanks for continuing the trend......................

I cant wait until You guys come into EWR, an airport as SH*TTY as EWR is, and with ground stops and delays you are going to wish you had better work rules becuase those FAA rest requirements really dont qualify as fair, and we all know how fair COLGAN is


PS, You want to know what a contract can do for you, this month I am scheduled to fly 90 hrs, well I am getting paid 128hrs, and for September I have 16 days off, and dont work a single weekend, and have a line value of 85 hrs, whats your September schedule look like?

Last edited by JoeyMeatballs; 08-22-2007 at 01:29 PM.
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 01:55 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by batman View Post
I voted.

And whats this about "just take out the beech guys.." do we not count? Our quality of life is just as important. You haven't been at a base like mine for over a year, working my schedule- so don't bother.
?? By that I meant they aren't hiring for the Beech 1900... seems to be a disproportional amount of problems on those lines. How long do you guys plan on staying at a regional??? I understand if you're here for the long term for one reason or another, but this is a stepping stone for a lot of people unfortunately and that's why there's a lack of interest -- many didn't bother to vote because they don't understand how it'll affect them in the IMMEDIATE FUTURE before they leave. You guys have a point but THIS VOTE WAS PREMATURE... Q400 guys arent here yet... there's still a small family-run mentality at some bases whether it's being run like that or not. There are 15 Q400s coming in -- options for 30 more last time I heard -- correct me if my numbers are wrong. Planned Q400 pay DOES suck -- I thought it was off by a good 15-20%... but who's been hired yet for that? Someone had an itchy trigger finger on this one and this is what you get. In the meantime go to www.colganpilotgroup.com

Another thing that adds some dynamics to this situation is the shortage of pilots -- how are they going to double their pilots in the next couple years? If the supply/demand issues with that don't bring something better along for everyone, then I don't know what will. Being in a firm contract (depending on what's in there) during that time might cause a lot of issues with trying to get people onboard and keeping them here. Any thoughts on that?
N618FT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
batman
Regional
14
08-15-2007 08:43 PM
stickwiggler
Regional
38
07-06-2007 01:20 PM
WatchThis!
Major
29
07-02-2007 03:06 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM
Diesel 10
Hangar Talk
4
07-20-2005 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices