Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Would I stand a chance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2007, 08:56 AM
  #41  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Exclamation

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
Studies have shown that the actual use of Thrust reversers have a very minimal if any effect at all when it comes to stopping an airplane, hence when they compute stopping distance they dont account for thrust reverseres being deployed. We "pop the buckets" to help create drag and bring the nose down but thrust reverser's are probably used by many because of the super cool sound they make not to mention how much sh*t they can throw into an engine as well as waste gas..............

PS the guy above says his landing would be "very interesting" if he didnt deploy the Thrust Reversers??????????????? Come on bro, If you are relying on that to get the airplane stopped you landed way too long and should have went around in the first place..........

Phoenix don't listen to anyone go out there and get the ******* job, dont let anybody, especially those who think Thrust Reversers saved there ass from going of the end of the runway, tell you any different

Saab, get real...at this moment I'm actually wondering if you are really a line pilot at a 121 operation. Try going to your next PC (or your upgrade ride) and tell the sim guy that you're not going to use the TR's cuz they don't do anything. Better yet, on your next trip tell the CA that you're not going to use the TR's on your legs....Good Luck!

The real reason we use TR's in daily operations: So you don't cook the brakes on every landing and take a 1 hour delay to cool them down (or a 3 hour delay for Mx inspection and/or new wheels).

BTW, the TR's have kept me on the runway at least once, in 2004 I think. Braking action was misreported, and the nose wheel ended up on the numbers...of the departure end
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 08:59 AM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Saab, get real...at this moment I'm actually wondering if you are really a line pilot at a 121 operation. Try going to your next PC (or your upgrade ride) and tell the sim guy that you're not going to use the TR's cuz they don't do anything. Better yet, on your next trip tell the CA that you're not going to use the TR's on your legs....Good Luck!

The real reason we use TR's in daily operations: So you don't cook the brakes on every landing and take a 1 hour delay to cool them down (or a 3 hour delay for Mx inspection and/or new wheels).

BTW, the TR's have kept me on the runway at least once, in 2004 I think. Braking action was misreported, and the nose wheel ended up on the numbers...of the departure end
You serious? Our CA's for the most part get annoyed when people use them, they really dont stop the airplane that much better than braking alone. ( 5-10% on a dry runway) (WET Runway I actually think it helps a ton so I am contracdicting myself but you get the point, if ya dont then just disregard

Rickair, Get real do some research on just how effective they really are......... I didnt say I dont ever use them but there not a magic Lever that stops the airplane in 1,000ft

Last edited by JoeyMeatballs; 09-20-2007 at 10:10 AM.
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 09:10 AM
  #43  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
You serious? Our CA's for the most part get annoyed when people use them, they really dont stop the airplane that much better than braking alone.

Rickair, Get real do some research on just how effective they really are......... I didnt say I dont ever use them but there not a magic Lever that stops the airplane in 1,000ft
OK, you're on the ERJ (which I've never flown). Are TR's optional during a sim ride? They are not optional on the CRJ, you always use them unless one is MEL'ed. Larger, heavier jets are designed with enough brake capacity to stop without TR's, but not enough to do a quick turn after landing on a 7000' runway on a warm day.

You are doing Phoenix a real disservice if you convince him to go to an interview and state the the TR's will not be a problem because he does not have to use them.

EDIT: Phoenix, if you're still following all this I am somewhat concerned with the whole hand-switching concept. If there's any way to possibly avoid that, try to figure it out. If you just have to do it, then take your best shot. Your challenge on the CRJ will be maintaining pitch AND roll inputs in a X-wind LDG while also deploying the TR's.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 09:11 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UPS1856's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Well then, let's all sing Kumbaya! You have a very optimistic view of human nature, your pax must be the nicest, most understanding pax in the whole industry...oh wait, you fly boxes so you wouldn't even know

I was trying to help the guy by pointing out possible stumbling blocks, so he could be prepared in advance to deal with them.
You don't think he is prepared for stumbling blocks? Sounds like he has jumped more hurdles in his short career than you will ever attain in your right seat of the CRJ.

Having said in my previous post I was typed in the CRJ and ERJ should have given you a hint that I did fly pax in a not so distant past.

With over 3,800 of worthless posts, I would think you could read a bit better than that. You crawled out from under J/O over to Skywest and still that bitter? Maybe you should sit this one out and let the adults handle this. Maybe Flight Info is better suited for your needs and "expertise".

PAX care about paying $49 one way to see Grandma and being somewhat on time. 99% of the people will never see you carry them A to B.

Last edited by UPS1856; 09-20-2007 at 09:36 AM.
UPS1856 is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 10:44 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cyrcadian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Popsicle Logic
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
.

PS the guy above says his landing would be "very interesting" if he didnt deploy the Thrust Reversers??????????????? Come on bro, If you are relying on that to get the airplane stopped you landed way too long and should have went around in the first place..........
Take a step back junior. All I am trying to get across is that if I have my TRs I want to use them and should be able to do so with no problem. If I could Fred Flintstone to a stop I would.

Like Rick said, we are dealing with the CRJ here not the ERJ which I know nothing about as well. Just because your company line philosophy dictates you don't deploy them doesn't mean that everyone else shouldn't.

Last edited by cyrcadian; 09-20-2007 at 11:00 AM. Reason: I is illiterate
cyrcadian is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 10:56 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cyrcadian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Popsicle Logic
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
You serious? Our CA's for the most part get annoyed when people use them, they really dont stop the airplane that much better than braking alone. ( 5-10% on a dry runway) (WET Runway I actually think it helps a ton so I am contracdicting myself but you get the point, if ya dont then just disregard

Rickair, Get real do some research on just how effective they really are......... I didnt say I dont ever use them but there not a magic Lever that stops the airplane in 1,000ft
Another thought:

Two of the memory items on the CRJ emergency checklist call for reverse thrust: Rejected Takeoff and Asymmetric Braking/Loss of Braking. Effective enough for the emergency checklist, effective enough for me.
cyrcadian is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 11:02 AM
  #47  
Furlough line holder
 
andy171773's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ2, ATR, CRJ7, E145, 737
Posts: 1,845
Default

In my opinion i think if you can manipulate the yoke, including the AP disconnect, trim, trim disconnect, sync button (on a CRJ) and PTT for the mic, then you should be fine from the right seat...since the left hand will do most of the work on the FCP, throttles, switches, and flashy lights

But a left seat position with that "switch" is highly unlikely, and i can only see that as being "safe" on the ground.

Keep up your great attitude, and you have absolutely nothing to lose by interviewing and seeing what the recruiters, HR, and captains have to say.

Keep your chin up, but don't expect to get it easily..if at all.


Happy trails
andy171773 is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 12:59 PM
  #48  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
PhoenixFlood's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: ERJ-170 FO
Posts: 55
Default

Yeah, I'm pretty aware of some of the other jets that don't have the most friendly TR's. The Citation comes to mind with the little finger lifts. Those would require a hand swap from the left seat.

You do deploy the TR's once all three are planted, correct? How long does it take to swap hands, for me anyway since I'm use to flying that way, about a blink of an eye. Cross wind control inputs, check, TR's deploy with the left hand.

As fas a public apperance is. I worry about it, but I figured it's probably on par with the appearance of a kid who can barely shave being thrown into the right seat.

I'm currently instructing a paraylzed guy for his private. Watching him swap between the throttle and rudder bar we had installed in his plane is like watching a duck swim. I had him in 15 knot direct crosswinds in his Colt and he greased them. I've flown with comemrcial students and would have to check my fillings in that same situation.

A captain at an undisclosed airline has said there was a company wide memo saying buckets only, no TR's due to FOD damage. From what I hear I guess it's helped.

I'll interview hopefully and get a sim checkout. I'll show them why they need to hire me.

Also, I submited my case before AOPA, all my medical history and facts with my SODA.

Here was there response:
"Since the issuance of the Americans with disabilities act, I think you would have the same change of being hired by the Regionals as anyone. If you have any problems with this, please contact me and I will be happy to assist you.

Jo Ann Wilson
Senior Medical Certification
TechnicianMedical Certification Department800.872.2672"

Last edited by PhoenixFlood; 09-20-2007 at 01:08 PM. Reason: added AOPA comment
PhoenixFlood is offline  
Old 09-20-2007, 01:44 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

I admire your courage. Keep your dream alive. Pursue your goal with all your heart, and it will happen. Keep us posted. We are all brothers in pursuit of our wild blue yonder.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 02-28-2008, 06:38 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
PhoenixFlood's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: ERJ-170 FO
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by cyrcadian View Post
I agree.

I hate to be "that guy", but it seems I am not alone. Public perception is a part of this situation and you have to consider it just as you have considered the every other possibility. I wish you the very best and honestly hope you get hired where ever you want to work, but I don't think it is going to happen. Just my opinion and I hope you prove me wrong.

What gets me is the thrust reverser hand "switch". I picture my two strongest crosswind landings (DAY and LGA) during the winter. If I take my hand off that yoke for one second we are drifting off the side of the runway. And if I don't deploy those reversers, stopping is going to be very interesting.

Bash away people.

BTW, if you do get hired at a regional, I want to be the first to know. Because I am going to buy you a steak dinner and watch you eat it with my foot in my mouth!

So, where do you want to meet for dinner? I just passed my checkride today in the ERJ-170.
PhoenixFlood is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sigep_nm
Regional
47
07-13-2007 09:08 PM
CaptainLuv
Major
11
12-28-2005 02:42 PM
mike734
Major
5
07-23-2005 12:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices