![]() |
Originally Posted by Foxcow
(Post 314348)
This discussion is about Skywest.
[tangent] I will agree that TSA has crappy wages (2nd year FO on the Brasilia is the only thing better than our rates) but we have a union with leverage that is negotiating on our behalf for a fair and equitable contract while not settling for something subpar. [/tangent] |
Alpa won't try at skywest for many many more years. Even the alpa supporters at skywest have let go, so should the rest of you. Worry about your own airlines and leave us alone, we are happy and arn't bothering any of you.
By the way, if you airline sucks so bad why are our newhire classes made up of 90% former 121 alpa pilots? |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 314853)
By the way, if you airline sucks so bad why are our newhire classes made up of 90% former 121 alpa pilots?
|
Originally Posted by POPA
(Post 314855)
Free ice cream.
|
Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
(Post 314869)
ROTFL...made me spit Budweiser out of my nose dude!
|
Speaking of beer, have you guys seen that ultrasonic Guinness surger?
Supercool. |
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 314607)
Ya, we skipped the middleman, and went straight to the wholesaler.
As to crappy wages at SkyWest, I think most of us here know that's not the case when we look at our W2's at the end of the year, compared to other regionals. I would argue, however, that the industry as a whole is woefully underpaid, and whether union A, B, or C, or no union at all, it still is sad. Don't see that changing any time soon. By the way, I wouldn't bet that pilot's wages and conditions of employment is more than the total worth of some other regional contracts. Especially when you consider productivity. The industry as a whole is underpaid and this vote to bring you just under ASA rates does NOT help considering the IMMENSE success of Skywest. It is sad that this will not see this fact change it any time soon.
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 314617)
Even amongst the various unions that represent air carrier pilots, there's not unity; e.g., APA was vehemently against age 65, ALPA (after flip flopping) for it.
ALPA would have had a much better chance at SkyWest if they had their own house in order. And I do think that an in house union has a better chance than ALPA did, but I don't see that unifying pilots any more than APA, SWAPA, Teamsters, and ALPA are unified. But, doesn't it get old belaboring union BS ? The vote is over, but they'll be another in 4 or 5 years, I GUARANTEE that. There'll be too many future 1.95% to pass up that attempt again, even if it does take a $5.3 million in the recruitment effort. Why not save your sales pitch for then? It doesnt get old to me "belaboring union BS." Organizing is an ongoing venture. And you are wrong about the money that dues bring in. Most regional MECs are subsidized by the major MECs. Its not the cash cow you say it is. It actually costs the association money to run many MECs. The few that do run positive put that money in the SMER account. But you already knew that.
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 314643)
Well, we're not exactly sitting back, but that's something I doubt we'll agree on.
I do agree, however, as I've said many, many times. If SkyWest is the biggest, and arguably one of the best, we should be paid the best, bar none. Clearly my argument didn't win the day:o
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 314853)
Alpa won't try at skywest for many many more years. Even the alpa supporters at skywest have let go, so should the rest of you. Worry about your own airlines and leave us alone, we are happy and arn't bothering any of you.
By the way, if you airline sucks so bad why are our newhire classes made up of 90% former 121 alpa pilots? |
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 314913)
Organizing is an ongoing process. Its not going to stop anytime soon. We worry about our own airlines and that is why we continue organizing. To many people, you do bother them.
|
ASA got some work rules in their new contract that we had on property without a union. A minimum daily guarantee of 3:45, a duty rig and we get paid extra if they schedule over 12 hours. I also THINK their 401k or profit sharing isn't as good as ours. So before you go rant and rave how the UNION got ASA what they got, get ALL of the facts first.
I was very disappointed that we didn't get higher rates than ASA considering our performance numbers are much better. But, I did my part and voted no. I can't do anything else. Going on here and complaining about it more isn't going to make it better. It took us two months to get our new raters in place where it took five years for ASA. How long will it take for TSA, Mesa, Pinnacle and whoever else will be going into negotiations soon? And no one ever answers the simple question... if a union is a powerful as you think, why are the majority of our classes filled with ex-121 ALPA guys? |
Originally Posted by Koolaidman
(Post 314964)
ASA got some work rules in their new contract that we had on property without a union. A minimum daily guarantee of 3:45, a duty rig and we get paid extra if they schedule over 12 hours. I also THINK their 401k or profit sharing isn't as good as ours. So before you go rant and rave how the UNION got ASA what they got, get ALL of the facts first.
I was very disappointed that we didn't get higher rates than ASA considering our performance numbers are much better. But, I did my part and voted no. I can't do anything else. Going on here and complaining about it more isn't going to make it better. It took us two months to get our new raters in place where it took five years for ASA. How long will it take for TSA, Mesa, Pinnacle and whoever else will be going into negotiations soon? And no one ever answers the simple question... if a union is a powerful as you think, why are the majority of our classes filled with ex-121 ALPA guys? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands