Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Newest Skywest Rumor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2008 | 08:42 PM
  #51  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
1) Airframes - maintain them and their just as good as your airplanes.

We've got a handful of planes from other carriers, and I'm confident that they are maintained now, but with few exceptions, there's always something.

Of course, none of the Comair birds have ACARS, and the ASA birds that we got were probably the ones that ASA didn't want. We have a few "blue ridge" planes on Midwest service, and the cockpits just looked sad. Rode hard and put away wet.


2) I'd say a solid 75% of our guys are pretty stand up guys and damn good pilots. Especially those dash guys. Think of what we deal with daily, and the fact that we do it safely (knock on wood). Those same guys would radically change their attitudes when being under the command of competent people, who aren't fellons.

As you know, SkyWest has TONS of Mesa pilots. Honestly, they're way better than any off the street hire, since they KNOW how bad it can be. I bump into Mesa guys from my new hire class regularly, and I don't think you could PAY them to come back to Mesa.


Fire JO and everyone else in a position of power, and fill those positions with competent men and women who know how to properly run an airline.

JO wouldn't survive. He get a golden parachute, and shown the door (assuming the whole operation isn't being bought through BK liquidation).
Reply
Old 02-12-2008 | 10:07 PM
  #52  
dontsurf's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 4
From: A220 CA
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
I know I have no right to refute you on what type of airline we are, but "getting your fingerprints" on us wouldn't be so terrible.

1) Airframes - maintain them and their just as good as your airplanes.

2) I'd say a solid 75% of our guys are pretty stand up guys and damn good pilots. Especially those dash guys. Think of what we deal with daily, and the fact that we do it safely (knock on wood). Those same guys would radically change their attitudes when being under the command of competent people, who aren't fellons.

3) Fire JO and everyone else in a position of power, and fill those positions with competent men and women who know how to properly run an airline.
i'm sure i speak for him and everyone else here when i say that getting the people from mesa isn't what he meant when he said it would be bad, basically. we all know mesa pilots, and just feel bad for the situation they are in. the people and the planes would be great assets to pick up, but the overall company (leadership, reputation, etc.) is a nightmare. no one here is saying anything bad about mesa pilots, believe me.
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 04:49 AM
  #53  
chitownpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-200/700 FO
Default

Originally Posted by dontsurf
i'm sure i speak for him and everyone else here when i say that getting the people from mesa isn't what he meant when he said it would be bad, basically. we all know mesa pilots, and just feel bad for the situation they are in. the people and the planes would be great assets to pick up, but the overall company (leadership, reputation, etc.) is a nightmare. no one here is saying anything bad about mesa pilots, believe me.
I never meant to insult any MAG pilot, I know a few and they are stand-up guys. I've just heard horrible stories (and face it, I do a lot of flying out of the F-concourse at ORD, and have seen the MAG planes), about how the planes are. That's what I was referring to. A company that skimps on maintenance and the almighty dollar, what hidden problems do these planes have? When I was MKE based, we had a few MEL's on those non-OO planes.
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 06:26 AM
  #54  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by WILLTinbound
I always thought that the US Airways flying that Mesa operates right now out of PHX and LAS would be something that Skywest mgmt would fight aggressively for if it were up for grabs.. but the idea of purchasing a company like Mesa and inheriting all their disgruntled employees, broken airplanes, and other problems doesnt seem like something that Jerry and Co. would want to deal with.. why would you want to buy a company thats gonna take so much effort to change the corporate culture.. my guess is that we'd just wait for Mesa to enter bancruptcy and then tell Airways we'd be happy to take over their Phoenix and Vegas operations..

also the idea of integrating (stapling) the seniority lists makes no sense either.. especially with Mesa being ALPA..

I'm not holding my breath for this one to come true
Yes.

Airways has been talking to SKW for years about the PHX/LAS flying...my gut feeling (no hard info) is that it is inevitable...not a matter of if, just when. My understanding is that the mesa contract is in it's twilight, with drawdown options available to Doug Parker starting last year.

I could not imagine SKW actually buying mesa intact...there are too many problems at mesa that SKW would not want to inherit:

- Go!
- Go! Lawsuits and financial damages.
- China Operation
- ALPA
- The corporate cultures are diametrically opposed, and the level of gross incompetence at mesa would lead me to think that the only solution would to burn it down and start all over.

The only POSSIBLE incentive that SKW would have to buy all or part of mesa would the pilot shortage. There might be no other way to staff up a large new operation.

One concept that comes to mind is to buy the needed airplanes from mesa at a premium (JO will do anything for money), and make a deal to allow any MAG pilot to VOLUNTARILY move over to SKW with new-hire SKW seniority, SKW pay based on their MAG longevity, and domicile fences to protect their relative seniority (ie stay in PHX, stay a captain). They would obviously leave ALPA behind. I think most would jump at that opportunity, just like the several hundred Pan-Am pilots who were allowed to lateral to UAL when UAL acquired pan-am's pacific routes.
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 08:40 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
One concept that comes to mind is to buy the needed airplanes from mesa at a premium (JO will do anything for money), and make a deal to allow any MAG pilot to VOLUNTARILY move over to SKW with new-hire SKW seniority, SKW pay based on their MAG longevity, and domicile fences to protect their relative seniority (ie stay in PHX, stay a captain). They would obviously leave ALPA behind. I think most would jump at that opportunity, just like the several hundred Pan-Am pilots who were allowed to lateral to UAL when UAL acquired pan-am's pacific routes.
This would depend on MAGALPA's fragmentation clause. I don't know what it is but it may prevent that sort of scenario, in which you get stapled to the bottom of the seniority list and leave ALPA behind.
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 08:55 AM
  #56  
tcasra's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default

Why would SKW want to intergrate the MAG seniority list with their own pilot group? When they bought ASA, didn't SKW keep them seperate because of the fact ASA was represented by ALPA. Do you not think that SKW would do the same with Mesa?
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 09:21 AM
  #57  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by tcasra
Why would SKW want to intergrate the MAG seniority list with their own pilot group? When they bought ASA, didn't SKW keep them seperate because of the fact ASA was represented by ALPA. Do you not think that SKW would do the same with Mesa?
No. SKW bought ASA intact from DAL because there was a benefit to doing so...guaranteed DAL flying. SKW was willing to take on ALPA and the screwed up ASA management as part of that deal.

With mesa, they have almost no incentive to take responsibility for an INTACT mesa management and ALPA...which is far more screwed up than ASA was. US Air doesn't own mesa and doesn't care what happens to them (actually that's not true, DP would like to see mesa burn in hell ). The ONLY thing that SKW MIGHT want from mesa is the pilots, and maybe some airplanes...which they can probably make a deal for without buying the whole package. JO will cheerfully dismantle his company for a quick buck.
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 09:29 AM
  #58  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
This would depend on MAGALPA's fragmentation clause. I don't know what it is but it may prevent that sort of scenario, in which you get stapled to the bottom of the seniority list and leave ALPA behind.
I'm familiar with the clause, it is not relevant unless SKW actually BUYS mesa (which they won't).

Here's how it would work:

1) US Air awards the PHX/LAS flying to SKW, coincident with the expiration of the mesa contract in 2012. The award would probably be in 2010, or even 2009 to allow transition planning.

2) SKW buys airplanes from mesa (or maybe from somewhere else). Buying from mesa at a higher-than-market value would effectively bribe JO to go along with the scheme.

3) SKW offers current MAG CRJ pilots the opportunity to staff the new flying with some incentive, fences and/or longevity protection. They would be SKW new hires with seniority to match to be fair to the SKW pilots. MAG pilots would be ecstatic to escape MAG and MAG/ALPA in exchange for the SKW package...especially if they don't have to interview and get to keep some longevity.


This scheme is not legally a successorship, and would only be necessary if the pilot market remains tight (which it probably will).
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 11:46 AM
  #59  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I'm familiar with the clause, it is not relevant unless SKW actually BUYS mesa (which they won't).

Here's how it would work:

1) US Air awards the PHX/LAS flying to SKW, coincident with the expiration of the mesa contract in 2012. The award would probably be in 2010, or even 2009 to allow transition planning.

2) SKW buys airplanes from mesa (or maybe from somewhere else). Buying from mesa at a higher-than-market value would effectively bribe JO to go along with the scheme.

3) SKW offers current MAG CRJ pilots the opportunity to staff the new flying with some incentive, fences and/or longevity protection. They would be SKW new hires with seniority to match to be fair to the SKW pilots. MAG pilots would be ecstatic to escape MAG and MAG/ALPA in exchange for the SKW package...especially if they don't have to interview and get to keep some longevity.


This scheme is not legally a successorship, and would only be necessary if the pilot market remains tight (which it probably will).
In this scenario, would those who brought a capt. seat to the deal keep it?

I see some genius in your posts on this topic, but part of my hopes you wrong, for my career's sake. Going back to new hire senority would be a kick in the nuts, given the decision I just made to not do it (become a new hire) voluntarily.
Reply
Old 02-13-2008 | 12:09 PM
  #60  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
In this scenario, would those who brought a capt. seat to the deal keep it?

I see some genius in your posts on this topic, but part of my hopes you wrong, for my career's sake. Going back to new hire senority would be a kick in the nuts, given the decision I just made to not do it (become a new hire) voluntarily.
Hold your horses, don't get too excited! I'm just speculating based on what I know about SKW and mesa (worked at both).

You can probably assume that US Air will get rid of mesa in 2-3 years, as DP has supposedly said so in public.

In order to staff a large new operation, SKW would really have to scramble due to the entry-level pilot shortage...one way to do this would be incentivize experienced mesa pilots by allowing them to retain their current seat, domicile, and pay (ex PHX CRJ CA). If they transfered out of PHX, into the existing SKW system, then they would be new-hire FO's.

Again, just speculation, not even a rumor. It's also posible that the mesa-SKW transition could be done over a long enough period (2+ years) to allow normal staffing by SKW.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
Cessnadriver
Regional
27
11-16-2007 07:10 PM
Ellen
Regional
92
07-11-2007 06:56 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices