Newest Skywest Rumor
#51
We've got a handful of planes from other carriers, and I'm confident that they are maintained now, but with few exceptions, there's always something.
Of course, none of the Comair birds have ACARS, and the ASA birds that we got were probably the ones that ASA didn't want. We have a few "blue ridge" planes on Midwest service, and the cockpits just looked sad. Rode hard and put away wet.
2) I'd say a solid 75% of our guys are pretty stand up guys and damn good pilots. Especially those dash guys. Think of what we deal with daily, and the fact that we do it safely (knock on wood). Those same guys would radically change their attitudes when being under the command of competent people, who aren't fellons.
As you know, SkyWest has TONS of Mesa pilots. Honestly, they're way better than any off the street hire, since they KNOW how bad it can be. I bump into Mesa guys from my new hire class regularly, and I don't think you could PAY them to come back to Mesa.
Fire JO and everyone else in a position of power, and fill those positions with competent men and women who know how to properly run an airline.
JO wouldn't survive. He get a golden parachute, and shown the door (assuming the whole operation isn't being bought through BK liquidation).
#52
I know I have no right to refute you on what type of airline we are, but "getting your fingerprints" on us wouldn't be so terrible.
1) Airframes - maintain them and their just as good as your airplanes.
2) I'd say a solid 75% of our guys are pretty stand up guys and damn good pilots. Especially those dash guys. Think of what we deal with daily, and the fact that we do it safely (knock on wood). Those same guys would radically change their attitudes when being under the command of competent people, who aren't fellons.
3) Fire JO and everyone else in a position of power, and fill those positions with competent men and women who know how to properly run an airline.
1) Airframes - maintain them and their just as good as your airplanes.
2) I'd say a solid 75% of our guys are pretty stand up guys and damn good pilots. Especially those dash guys. Think of what we deal with daily, and the fact that we do it safely (knock on wood). Those same guys would radically change their attitudes when being under the command of competent people, who aren't fellons.
3) Fire JO and everyone else in a position of power, and fill those positions with competent men and women who know how to properly run an airline.
#53
i'm sure i speak for him and everyone else here when i say that getting the people from mesa isn't what he meant when he said it would be bad, basically. we all know mesa pilots, and just feel bad for the situation they are in. the people and the planes would be great assets to pick up, but the overall company (leadership, reputation, etc.) is a nightmare. no one here is saying anything bad about mesa pilots, believe me.
#54
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I always thought that the US Airways flying that Mesa operates right now out of PHX and LAS would be something that Skywest mgmt would fight aggressively for if it were up for grabs.. but the idea of purchasing a company like Mesa and inheriting all their disgruntled employees, broken airplanes, and other problems doesnt seem like something that Jerry and Co. would want to deal with.. why would you want to buy a company thats gonna take so much effort to change the corporate culture.. my guess is that we'd just wait for Mesa to enter bancruptcy and then tell Airways we'd be happy to take over their Phoenix and Vegas operations..
also the idea of integrating (stapling) the seniority lists makes no sense either.. especially with Mesa being ALPA..
I'm not holding my breath for this one to come true
also the idea of integrating (stapling) the seniority lists makes no sense either.. especially with Mesa being ALPA..
I'm not holding my breath for this one to come true
Airways has been talking to SKW for years about the PHX/LAS flying...my gut feeling (no hard info) is that it is inevitable...not a matter of if, just when. My understanding is that the mesa contract is in it's twilight, with drawdown options available to Doug Parker starting last year.
I could not imagine SKW actually buying mesa intact...there are too many problems at mesa that SKW would not want to inherit:
- Go!
- Go! Lawsuits and financial damages.
- China Operation
- ALPA
- The corporate cultures are diametrically opposed, and the level of gross incompetence at mesa would lead me to think that the only solution would to burn it down and start all over.
The only POSSIBLE incentive that SKW would have to buy all or part of mesa would the pilot shortage. There might be no other way to staff up a large new operation.
One concept that comes to mind is to buy the needed airplanes from mesa at a premium (JO will do anything for money), and make a deal to allow any MAG pilot to VOLUNTARILY move over to SKW with new-hire SKW seniority, SKW pay based on their MAG longevity, and domicile fences to protect their relative seniority (ie stay in PHX, stay a captain). They would obviously leave ALPA behind. I think most would jump at that opportunity, just like the several hundred Pan-Am pilots who were allowed to lateral to UAL when UAL acquired pan-am's pacific routes.
#55
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
One concept that comes to mind is to buy the needed airplanes from mesa at a premium (JO will do anything for money), and make a deal to allow any MAG pilot to VOLUNTARILY move over to SKW with new-hire SKW seniority, SKW pay based on their MAG longevity, and domicile fences to protect their relative seniority (ie stay in PHX, stay a captain). They would obviously leave ALPA behind. I think most would jump at that opportunity, just like the several hundred Pan-Am pilots who were allowed to lateral to UAL when UAL acquired pan-am's pacific routes.
#56
Why would SKW want to intergrate the MAG seniority list with their own pilot group? When they bought ASA, didn't SKW keep them seperate because of the fact ASA was represented by ALPA. Do you not think that SKW would do the same with Mesa?
#57
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
With mesa, they have almost no incentive to take responsibility for an INTACT mesa management and ALPA...which is far more screwed up than ASA was. US Air doesn't own mesa and doesn't care what happens to them (actually that's not true, DP would like to see mesa burn in hell
). The ONLY thing that SKW MIGHT want from mesa is the pilots, and maybe some airplanes...which they can probably make a deal for without buying the whole package. JO will cheerfully dismantle his company for a quick buck.
#58
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Here's how it would work:
1) US Air awards the PHX/LAS flying to SKW, coincident with the expiration of the mesa contract in 2012. The award would probably be in 2010, or even 2009 to allow transition planning.
2) SKW buys airplanes from mesa (or maybe from somewhere else). Buying from mesa at a higher-than-market value would effectively bribe JO to go along with the scheme.
3) SKW offers current MAG CRJ pilots the opportunity to staff the new flying with some incentive, fences and/or longevity protection. They would be SKW new hires with seniority to match to be fair to the SKW pilots. MAG pilots would be ecstatic to escape MAG and MAG/ALPA in exchange for the SKW package...especially if they don't have to interview and get to keep some longevity.
This scheme is not legally a successorship, and would only be necessary if the pilot market remains tight (which it probably will).
#59
I'm familiar with the clause, it is not relevant unless SKW actually BUYS mesa (which they won't).
Here's how it would work:
1) US Air awards the PHX/LAS flying to SKW, coincident with the expiration of the mesa contract in 2012. The award would probably be in 2010, or even 2009 to allow transition planning.
2) SKW buys airplanes from mesa (or maybe from somewhere else). Buying from mesa at a higher-than-market value would effectively bribe JO to go along with the scheme.
3) SKW offers current MAG CRJ pilots the opportunity to staff the new flying with some incentive, fences and/or longevity protection. They would be SKW new hires with seniority to match to be fair to the SKW pilots. MAG pilots would be ecstatic to escape MAG and MAG/ALPA in exchange for the SKW package...especially if they don't have to interview and get to keep some longevity.
This scheme is not legally a successorship, and would only be necessary if the pilot market remains tight (which it probably will).
Here's how it would work:
1) US Air awards the PHX/LAS flying to SKW, coincident with the expiration of the mesa contract in 2012. The award would probably be in 2010, or even 2009 to allow transition planning.
2) SKW buys airplanes from mesa (or maybe from somewhere else). Buying from mesa at a higher-than-market value would effectively bribe JO to go along with the scheme.
3) SKW offers current MAG CRJ pilots the opportunity to staff the new flying with some incentive, fences and/or longevity protection. They would be SKW new hires with seniority to match to be fair to the SKW pilots. MAG pilots would be ecstatic to escape MAG and MAG/ALPA in exchange for the SKW package...especially if they don't have to interview and get to keep some longevity.
This scheme is not legally a successorship, and would only be necessary if the pilot market remains tight (which it probably will).
I see some genius in your posts on this topic, but part of my hopes you wrong, for my career's sake. Going back to new hire senority would be a kick in the nuts, given the decision I just made to not do it (become a new hire) voluntarily.
#60
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
In this scenario, would those who brought a capt. seat to the deal keep it?
I see some genius in your posts on this topic, but part of my hopes you wrong, for my career's sake. Going back to new hire senority would be a kick in the nuts, given the decision I just made to not do it (become a new hire) voluntarily.
I see some genius in your posts on this topic, but part of my hopes you wrong, for my career's sake. Going back to new hire senority would be a kick in the nuts, given the decision I just made to not do it (become a new hire) voluntarily.
You can probably assume that US Air will get rid of mesa in 2-3 years, as DP has supposedly said so in public.
In order to staff a large new operation, SKW would really have to scramble due to the entry-level pilot shortage...one way to do this would be incentivize experienced mesa pilots by allowing them to retain their current seat, domicile, and pay (ex PHX CRJ CA). If they transfered out of PHX, into the existing SKW system, then they would be new-hire FO's.
Again, just speculation, not even a rumor. It's also posible that the mesa-SKW transition could be done over a long enough period (2+ years) to allow normal staffing by SKW.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



