Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle in Miami

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2008 | 12:43 PM
  #11  
bryris's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Hotel
Default

Originally Posted by TBucket
Just keep in mind, it's not the pilots' fault that TSA got assigned those routes... Take it out on the mgmt, not the guys flying the jets... The guys that are actually down there just had that trip come up on their bid packets... It's not their fault... (Regardless of what problem you may or may not have with who got the route).
Precisely.

I mean, every added airplane and route is good for us, it adds to job security, etc. But, with airline politics as complex as they are now, no single decision will not result in some group being upset about it. The airlines are bleeding money, so they give the flying to someone else who can do it cheaper. That sounds like a good decision to me. But, it screws over the Eagle guys, sort of helps out the TSA guys. But even so, the managements are running this show, not the crews.
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 12:47 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ChickenFlight
AMR's planes that Eagle pilots feel should be flown by AMR (Eagle) pilots. Similar to the fact that Trans States Holdings owns some CRJs that GoJet is flying and TSA pilots feel should be flown by TSA. I DISLIKE GOJET TOO but just look at it from Eagle perspective.
See that's where the confusion comes into play. You realize that routes that AA and Eagle fly are old TWA and TWE routes, right? Those were TSA's routes, and AA is giving some to us. True, we do it cheaper, but so does CHQ.

GoJet on the otherhand was created to undercut a pilot group in pay and QOL. We didn't do that to Eagle pilots though
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 01:08 PM
  #13  
coldpilot's Avatar
DisplAAced
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 FO
Default

But that flying is being done in EAGLE airplanes. We have no problem that you are flying old TWE routes, just that you are doing it in our airplanes rather than your own. I know its not the pilot groups fault but it still pretty crappy what is being done and with the threat of furloughs here at Eagle a lot of guys are not happy that our planes are being leased to a competitor.
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 01:19 PM
  #14  
willflyforcash's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: A320 starboard... Arrrr
Default

Additionally, in accordance with scope and contract clauses, Connection is not suppose to operate out of MIA, only STL. The company is knowingly violating this and ALPA allowed it because the company (about 2 months ago) claimed that we needed those planes doing the MIA flying so we could expand ORD and DFW flying. This is kind of like us, taking our planes and flying them as CO Express or Delta Conn. We arent allowed to do this, and at the same time the company is not allowed to give out MIA flying to TSA/CHQ guys. Of course we are ****ed. And granted, it is not the TSA crew's faults, however, dont blame us for disliking your company on the whole. Its the way things work.
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 01:26 PM
  #15  
bryris's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Hotel
Default

Originally Posted by coldpilot
But that flying is being done in EAGLE airplanes. We have no problem that you are flying old TWE routes, just that you are doing it in our airplanes rather than your own. I know its not the pilot groups fault but it still pretty crappy what is being done and with the threat of furloughs here at Eagle a lot of guys are not happy that our planes are being leased to a competitor.
This is so stupid. The airplane is a piece of metal. If you leased your old car to someone and they drive it to go bang your ex girlfriend that dumped you, does that mean that if he drove another vehicle to your -ex's house that its OK?

So what if we got the Eagle planes and flew them on our TDub routes, and then used our Swissair birds to do the MIA flying? Would that be OK?

Plus, we are paying you to operate these airplanes. It isn't like we jacked them from you.

But, I do get the point. It would suck, no question.
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 01:38 PM
  #16  
coldpilot's Avatar
DisplAAced
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by bryris
This is so stupid. The airplane is a piece of metal. If you leased your old car to someone and they drive it to go bang your ex girlfriend that dumped you, does that mean that if he drove another vehicle to your -ex's house that its OK?

So what if we got the Eagle planes and flew them on our TDub routes, and then used our Swissair birds to do the MIA flying? Would that be OK?

Plus, we are paying you to operate these airplanes. It isn't like we jacked them from you.

But, I do get the point. It would suck, no question.
I think that's a poor shot at creating an analogy but whatever.

It's not like I went to TSA and said "Hey come lease these Eagle airplanes."

The point behind it is that its BS that guys here, myself included, are looking at being on the street come fall while airplanes that are owned by Eagle are leased to a competitor. It's a violation of our scope clause. Now I will give you the fact that the company won that grievance because Eagle was in a time of "significant growth" and couldn't staff the airplanes at the time. Well if guys here are furloughed that becomes erroneous. That is the issue at hand.
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 01:50 PM
  #17  
bryris's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Hotel
Default

Originally Posted by coldpilot
I think that's a poor shot at creating an analogy but whatever.

It's not like I went to TSA and said "Hey come lease these Eagle airplanes."

The point behind it is that its BS that guys here, myself included, are looking at being on the street come fall while airplanes that are owned by Eagle are leased to a competitor. It's a violation of our scope clause. Now I will give you the fact that the company won that grievance because Eagle was in a time of "significant growth" and couldn't staff the airplanes at the time. Well if guys here are furloughed that becomes erroneous. That is the issue at hand.
Maybe so.

Can you find the exact scope clause wording? I'd like to see it if possible.
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 02:00 PM
  #18  
A10crewdawg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: ERJ 145 F/O
Default .....

You aren't the only people worrying about furloughs. Talk to our 22 downgrades and the guys who could be getting furloughed soon. Still doesn't make it right that you guys are acting like five year olds who can't have candy in the checkout line at the grocery store.
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 02:01 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Last I remember, a few months ago Eagle couldn't staff their airplanes, and they had 100+ FO vacancies for ORD or something crazy like that anyway.

And we're looking at furloughs at TSA as a possibility as well
Reply
Old 06-02-2008 | 02:02 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A10crewdawg
You aren't the only people worrying about furloughs. Talk to our 22 downgrades and the guys who could be getting furloughed soon. Still doesn't make it right that you guys are acting like five year olds who can't have candy in the checkout line at the grocery store.
we're all pilots bro

we complain how heavy the bags of money you give us are as well
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
35
03-13-2016 04:38 AM
Lbell911
Regional
18
11-26-2007 11:56 AM
Scott34567
Regional
5
09-25-2007 11:29 AM
Noleone
Regional
7
09-21-2007 07:24 AM
FDX aviator
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 11:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices