Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Colgan Changes Rules again to SUIT THEM >

Colgan Changes Rules again to SUIT THEM

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Colgan Changes Rules again to SUIT THEM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2008, 09:49 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shamrok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
Anyone who even cares about that list is a tool. That is the liars list. Who cares about an ontime performance list when we do not have ACARS.
Thats my point, its retarded.
shamrok is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 09:55 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shamrok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by Pitts S2B View Post
The only thing you will gain is turboprop PIC (which, IMO, will not get you far). Get hired at a larger regional. Second year FO pay is better than what you will make as a captain! Then upgrade, get jet PIC and go from there!
Obviously you don't know all that much about this industry. Turbine PIC time is pretty good in most people's books. There are some carriers that might prefer JET time but for you to say you will not get far is not very intelligent.
shamrok is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 11:03 AM
  #43  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by Pitts S2B View Post
The only thing you will gain is turboprop PIC (which, IMO, will not get you far). Get hired at a larger regional. Second year FO pay is better than what you will make as a captain! Then upgrade, get jet PIC and go from there!
Wow, get a clue. Maybe all of us prop guys (1900, Saab, Bro, Dash) can get on at a real airline one day. We are just putting around in these prop planes bulding time for an RJ FO position.

So Pitts, how do you explain all these prop guys moving on to fly mainline metal if the prop (turbine) PIC will not get you far, in your opinion of course?
The Juice is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 11:07 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by shamrok View Post
Obviously you don't know all that much about this industry. Turbine PIC time is pretty good in most people's books. There are some carriers that might prefer JET time but for you to say you will not get far is not very intelligent.

He does have a point. The last round of hiring they were taking people with Jet SIC time over folks with PIC in smaller turbine planes. Others were specifying that the time had to be in something over 45,000 pounds.
Mason32 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 11:18 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B757F CA
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32 View Post
He does have a point. The last round of hiring they were taking people with Jet SIC time over folks with PIC in smaller turbine planes. Others were specifying that the time had to be in something over 45,000 pounds.

The only airline that I recall where this was the policy was/is Cathay Pacific. Other than that, can you name another one? PIC time is much more valuable than any type of SIC time, unless maybe you're talking about space shuttle time.

The boatload of jet SIC time that I acquired at Eagle didn't do me, nor any of my buddies, any good in getting interviews at the majors. I'd say that aside from personal contacts, networking, and internal recommendations, PIC time is where it's at.
IQuitEagle is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 11:33 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by IQuitEagle View Post
The only airline that I recall where this was the policy was/is Cathay Pacific. Other than that, can you name another one? PIC time is much more valuable than any type of SIC time, unless maybe you're talking about space shuttle time.
Delta was hiring this past year with SIC time, as was USAir and JB. One of them had the over 45,000 pound requirement; don't remember which one. Their SIC required time was significantly higher than those with PIC time in over 45,000 pound AC... So, I would agree; PIC is better, but not always.

Originally Posted by IQuitEagle View Post
The boatload of jet SIC time that I acquired at Eagle didn't do me, nor any of my buddies, any good in getting interviews at the majors. I'd say that aside from personal contacts, networking, and internal recommendations, PIC time is where it's at.
Many Eaglets at JB with SIC time only, a few at USAir that I know of... but you are correct, networking plays a much larger role than people think.
Mason32 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 11:45 AM
  #47  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

guys TPIC is TPIC, go ask SouthWest Recruiters and you'll see they seem to have a preference for Turbo-Prop guys.

Its more important who walks your resume in, not whats on it
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 12:07 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by flyguyniner11 View Post
I know we r going to have a apla vote but what about teamsters. Someone told me that they had enough cards but I havnt heard about a vote
they have until 11/4 (I believe) to file their cards. if they do, they will be included in the ballot, and people can vote for either one and the union with the majority votes will win.

if they dont file their cards, only ALPA will be on the ballot. this may dissuade some of those diehard IBT guys from voting, and thus if the vote fails AGAIN, any union who wants to try again has to wait ANOTHER year. what I'm saying is if IBT doesnt file this time, they're gonna have to wait another year. that is another 12 months without a contract. 1 more year of BS like street captains being allowed to transition ahead of guys senior to them. I hope those IBT guys think about this before they decide not to vote, if they are truly for representation.

Last edited by kalyx522; 10-28-2008 at 12:16 PM.
kalyx522 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 12:14 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by Pitts S2B View Post
The only thing you will gain is turboprop PIC (which, IMO, will not get you far). Get hired at a larger regional. Second year FO pay is better than what you will make as a captain! Then upgrade, get jet PIC and go from there!
uhm, LOL. what "larger regional" am I going to get hired at right now?

Originally Posted by Mason32 View Post
Delta was hiring this past year with SIC time, as was USAir and JB. One of them had the over 45,000 pound requirement; don't remember which one. Their SIC required time was significantly higher than those with PIC time in over 45,000 pound AC... So, I would agree; PIC is better, but not always.
I think you're right that DAL didnt have a PIC requirement, but that doesnt mean they dont value it. Also, DAL is definitely not the one with the 45k lb requirement... there were 2 or 3 CAs from colgan who went over there this past spring and they had only saab time.
kalyx522 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 12:19 PM
  #50  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

I heard it was Jetblue that had the weight requirement but did not specify whether it was jet or prop. A few guys that had interview came to the 400 because they said the saab did not meet the requirement. I do not know the weight they were looking for.

Thats my plan though, get 1000 TPIC in the Q400 so I can get on with Comair or someone and start building some SIC jet time.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cptmorgancrunch
Regional
5
10-21-2008 05:17 AM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
5
09-22-2008 08:30 AM
shimmydamp
Regional
37
08-29-2008 05:34 AM
PinnacleFO
Regional
44
08-22-2008 08:04 AM
Blackbird
Regional
9
08-22-2008 03:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices