Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Rah To Operate 10 E-190's For Us Airways >

Rah To Operate 10 E-190's For Us Airways

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Rah To Operate 10 E-190's For Us Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2008 | 08:23 PM
  #21  
B1900YX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Clear Left
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Nice job trying to stir the pot, but it's BS and a huge flamebait.

Hey, I not trying to stir any pots here... I was reading about the 170 on wikipedia, eventually ended up reading about RAH. And came across that info. It ws posted right below the midwest flying and above the Hawaiian flying. But now its gone...
Hopefully someone in here saw it as well when I first posted the link here on APC, and can back me up on this...

By the way I am furloughed from S5, and currently with Compass, that being said I am not trying to start any rumors or flaimbaits here. I was just curious if I was the first one to discover this info...

If anyone else saw it, please back me up here...
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 08:24 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by B1900YX
If anyone else saw it, please back me up here...
B1900YX, read my post above yours.

Oh and to give you some more info on Wikipedia. Jack Johnson was the CEO of ExpressJet the other day.



Here's the post on Wikipedia you were refering to:
Old Republic Airlines page on Wikipedia

"On November 1, 2008 Republic Airways Holdings entered into an agreement to operate 10 EMB 190s for U.S. Airways in return for the $35 million dollar loan Republic will make to U.S. Airways"

It was false and removed.

Last edited by tpersuit; 11-05-2008 at 08:32 PM.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 09:14 PM
  #23  
NonRev4Life's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

I just want to say thanks to everyone who didnt believe in this craziness and didnt blow it out of proportion.
Reply
Old 11-06-2008 | 05:03 AM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by B1900YX
Hey, I not trying to stir any pots here... I was reading about the 170 on wikipedia, eventually ended up reading about RAH. And came across that info. It ws posted right below the midwest flying and above the Hawaiian flying. But now its gone...
Hopefully someone in here saw it as well when I first posted the link here on APC, and can back me up on this...

By the way I am furloughed from S5, and currently with Compass, that being said I am not trying to start any rumors or flaimbaits here. I was just curious if I was the first one to discover this info...

If anyone else saw it, please back me up here...
Yeah, I shouldn't have directed my post at you, it was intended for whoever went onto Wikipedia and changed info. That's why Wikipedia is somewhat unreliable at times. The info is easily tampered with. Sorry for making it seem like an attack towards you.
Reply
Old 11-06-2008 | 05:55 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

a) RAH guys stop thinking the 35 mil is a big loan. Airways secured somewhere close to 800-900 mil in loans in the last few months. And you have no idea who loaned the rest.
b) you have no pay scale for a 190. not that you need one cuz it will prob be flown just as cheap as the 170-175.
c) Airways will not allow an express carrier to fly an aircraft with a 1st class. And you are already beyond the scope now.
d) if it was true....why 10? they wont have mainline fly 13 and you fly 10...it would be all or nothing....
please RAH guys check yourselves.
Reply
Old 11-06-2008 | 06:14 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: E170
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy19348
b) you have no pay scale for a 190. not that you need one cuz it will prob be flown just as cheap as the 170-175.
Just to correct you on this -

We do have a pay scale for 79-99 Turbojet Aircraft. It doesn't specifically state E190 as it does in the APC Quicktake, but we have a payscale that would fit for the USAir E-190 configuration.

I am not going to say whether or not we should get them. All that I ask is that you research information prior to posting it here.

The ironic thing, too, is that after year 12, a Republic E190 Captain (which I know doesn't exist right now) is actually making more in a 190 than a USAir Captain. At year 15, a 170 Captain is making more than a USAir 190 Captain. So I ask you, who is flying them just as cheap?

I'm just getting really tired of pilots blaming pilots about lessening the profession, taking jobs, doing the same job for cheaper money, etc. Everyone talks about unity - where is it? Last I checked, it was management making the decisions. In the end, I just want to fly and make sure that I have enough money to support my family.

Last edited by EEmbraer; 11-06-2008 at 06:25 AM.
Reply
Old 11-06-2008 | 06:23 AM
  #27  
Flyboy8784's Avatar
Am I Wrong??????????
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: ThE jEtTtTtTtT
Default

Somebody please close/lock this thread before peoples blood pressures spike and heart attacks ensue
Reply
Old 11-06-2008 | 07:10 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EEmbraer
The ironic thing, too, is that after year 12, a Republic E190 Captain (which I know doesn't exist right now) is actually making more in a 190 than a USAir Captain. At year 15, a 170 Captain is making more than a USAir 190 Captain. So I ask you, who is flying them just as cheap?
See what they had to do to keep thier own airplanes from RAH
Reply
Old 11-06-2008 | 07:17 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 1
From: 744 CA
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy19348
a) RAH guys stop thinking the 35 mil is a big loan. Airways secured somewhere close to 800-900 mil in loans in the last few months. And you have no idea who loaned the rest.
b) you have no pay scale for a 190. not that you need one cuz it will prob be flown just as cheap as the 170-175.
c) Airways will not allow an express carrier to fly an aircraft with a 1st class. And you are already beyond the scope now.
d) if it was true....why 10? they wont have mainline fly 13 and you fly 10...it would be all or nothing....
please RAH guys check yourselves.
Well maybe if you didnt shoot your mouth of like the post above guys would just let it go..... for what it is/was..... a load of BS meant to **** people off.
Reply
Old 11-06-2008 | 07:21 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

.................................................. ........................................

Last edited by heywood; 11-06-2008 at 07:44 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
8
10-30-2008 12:04 PM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices