Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ARJ21 First Flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2008 | 06:41 AM
  #21  
vtbvtdk's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: 9K CA
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
It seems to me that they simply mated a DC-9 with CRJ engines and flight deck.

Yeah if you go to the news site that's linked and click on the hyperlink to the ARJ21-700 aircraft info, it talks about the design. Quote:

"The ARJ 21 is built using tooling provided by McDonnell Douglas for licenses production of the MD-90. The ARJ21 has a strong resemblance to the DC-9 series aircraft with identical nose profile and cabin cross-section."

So there you go. They aren't ashamed at all. DC-9 on the outside and in the cabin, CRJ in the cockpit and on the engine pylons....
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 08:19 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: CR7 FO
Default

Nobody tell Northwest or Delta that you can put CRJ engines on a DC-9 or they'll try it
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 08:29 AM
  #23  
Avroman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 4
From: FIRE ALPA
Default

Originally Posted by BobSakamano
Here's a PHOTO of the flight deck. It looks like a CRJ replica. Collins Pro-Line, very similar switchgear. The center console looks nearly identical.
Well the Communists have always been good at stealing a western design, repainting it, and calling it thier own design.....
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 08:45 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Default

I want to puke with some of the negative comments on this board.
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 09:21 AM
  #25  
Splanky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Moving backwards
Default

Originally Posted by flyviper
I want to puke with some of the negative comments on this board.
I know, geez. Why do all the people posting think that a company shouldn't call a plane their own, new design when they piece together a bunch of different components from other airplanes. Its not like China has rules against this or anything.

I think I will go vomit too.
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 09:28 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Default

Originally Posted by ChickenFlight
Nobody tell Northwest or Delta that you can put CRJ engines on a DC-9 or they'll try it
LOL!!!! Now that's funny.... and probably true! At least I wouldn't have to choke on blue smoke every time I depart behind one!
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 10:35 AM
  #27  
Gear handle manipulator
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: B-737 First officer
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
How original
Exaclty......I mean thats bascially the CRJ (200,700,900) cockpit. Combine that with the DC-9 body and everything else......

But hey Im not hating, im glad that it flew.......
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 12:21 PM
  #28  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

IIRC, the ARJ21 was designed for a specific domestic flying niche in china. I don't think it will even be certified by the FAA/JAA...so we probably won't see it in mesa colors (unless you go to china).
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 12:53 PM
  #29  
Poprocket's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: MD88 CA
Default

The wing is Russian, the engines are American (GE CF34-10A, used on EMB190/195s).

And how original: ARJ-21: Asian Regional Jet, 21st century.

Even though the fuselage dates back to the 50s and the engines to the 80s.

Whatever, China.
Reply
Old 12-02-2008 | 01:48 PM
  #30  
flynavyj's Avatar
Gets EVERY weekend off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: SIC
Default

Originally Posted by 405PA
Besides the lead posining didn't we call this the 717 the first time this came out?
much the same, and just like people got mad at boeing for calling it their own design, the Chinese are doing the same thing....Guess you could say we caused it ourselves though, had McDonald Douglas not tried to export manufacturing to China, it probably wouldn't have happened that way anyway.

I can only think of how the "performance" would be, with underpowered engines on a DC9 body....sounds SLOW.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices