Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Great Lakes vs. Flight Express >

Great Lakes vs. Flight Express

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Great Lakes vs. Flight Express

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2009, 02:46 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Beech 1900D
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by boilerpilot View Post
To answer your question about the majors at least, no major will hire you without turbine time. Most majors won't even hire you unless you have PIC multi turbine time.
I totally agree. The best time in the book is 121 PIC multi-turbine, as far as the 121 world is concerned. I don't think 1.5 years right seat at Lakes is much better than 1.5 years left seat at Flight Express, though, as far as career progression is concerned. Does anyone have any experiences where a bunch of SIC-turbine led to a better job than a bunch of PIC multi-piston would have? I'm curious now.
1900luxuryliner is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 03:25 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
rickB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: HS125
Posts: 194
Default

im 21 and at lakes and its awesome... denver is legit and the mountains are dumpin snow usually which makes for some good shred dawgin... woof woof woof!
rickB is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 03:33 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Great Lakes, without a doubt. 121 turbine time is still turbine time and when it all boils down to it for airlines, it's more important than piston pic. 1.5 years is just right time needed to mature for the left seat. Now I'm sure you understand that with no college degree it will be very hard to find a major job.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 04:38 PM
  #14  
Tuk er jerbs!
 
NightIP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: B747 Left
Posts: 1,342
Default

Originally Posted by Purpleanga View Post
Great Lakes, without a doubt. 121 turbine time is still turbine time and when it all boils down to it for airlines, it's more important than piston pic. 1.5 years is just right time needed to mature for the left seat. Now I'm sure you understand that with no college degree it will be very hard to find a major job.
I have to disagree with you a bit here. I certainly agree that turbine PIC is more highly valued than piston PIC, but turbine SIC? PIC is PIC any way you slice it, and while turbine SIC can give you good experience, you're simply not signing for the airplane. A large amount of PIC time looks great on a resume, even if it's in a piston aircraft. The type of operation (say, Part 135) can make a good deal of difference too.

Who would you rather hire?

- An applicant with 4000TT, including 3500 turbine SIC

or

- An applicant with 4000TT, 2500 Part 135 piston PIC, and 1000 turbine SIC

Personally? I think he should go to Flight Express. Not only will the pay be much better, the experience of single-pilot flying is second to none.
NightIP is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 04:47 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
mjb00123's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by NightIP View Post
I have to disagree with you a bit here. I certainly agree that turbine PIC is more highly valued than piston PIC, but turbine SIC? PIC is PIC any way you slice it, and while turbine SIC can give you good experience, you're simply not signing for the airplane. A large amount of PIC time looks great on a resume, even if it's in a piston aircraft. The type of operation (say, Part 135) can make a good deal of difference too.

Who would you rather hire?

- An applicant with 4000TT, including 3500 turbine SIC

or

- An applicant with 4000TT, 2500 Part 135 piston PIC, and 1000 turbine SIC

Personally? I think he should go to Flight Express. Not only will the pay be much better, the experience of single-pilot flying is second to none.
Well Said!
mjb00123 is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 04:53 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Originally Posted by NightIP View Post
I have to disagree with you a bit here. I certainly agree that turbine PIC is more highly valued than piston PIC, but turbine SIC? PIC is PIC any way you slice it, and while turbine SIC can give you good experience, you're simply not signing for the airplane. A large amount of PIC time looks great on a resume, even if it's in a piston aircraft. The type of operation (say, Part 135) can make a good deal of difference too.

Who would you rather hire?

- An applicant with 4000TT, including 3500 turbine SIC

or

- An applicant with 4000TT, 2500 Part 135 piston PIC, and 1000 turbine SIC

Personally? I think he should go to Flight Express. Not only will the pay be much better, the experience of single-pilot flying is second to none.
Good point. However, you aren't the one hiring. After 3 years at Flight Express you can get a job at a regional. After 3 years at Great Lakes (and making captain after 1.5 years) you can go anywhere.

I flew at Flight Express and while you'll get more time off, you'll actually have less of a life. It's hard to meet girls when you get off at 5am and have no real co-workers. While Great Lakes isn't a great job, it meets the requirements for moving on to bigger and better things and Denver is a great city filled with fun people and things to do.
labbats is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 05:04 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ohiocrjfo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CRJ 200 FO
Posts: 138
Default

As an ex FLX guy I can say I would recommend FLX to start off, and then when the regional stuff takes off again jump ship to go to a good regional/corp job.

Just don't be suprised if 8 months doesn't hold up for the upgrade. I was told 6 months when I started and it ended up being over a year in the 210.
Ohiocrjfo is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 05:07 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CRJPlt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: 320B
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by NightIP View Post
I have to disagree with you a bit here. I certainly agree that turbine PIC is more highly valued than piston PIC, but turbine SIC? PIC is PIC any way you slice it, and while turbine SIC can give you good experience, you're simply not signing for the airplane. A large amount of PIC time looks great on a resume, even if it's in a piston aircraft. The type of operation (say, Part 135) can make a good deal of difference too.

Who would you rather hire?

- An applicant with 4000TT, including 3500 turbine SIC

or

- An applicant with 4000TT, 2500 Part 135 piston PIC, and 1000 turbine SIC

Personally? I think he should go to Flight Express. Not only will the pay be much better, the experience of single-pilot flying is second to none.

Interview em both and choose the one who isn't as much of a tool. They both would have good quals for an interview and after that it's them as a person....
CRJPlt is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 05:10 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Default

What is there to think about until Monday? Tell Flight Express you'll take the job. Interview with Great Lakes, if you get hired then make a decision. The real question isn't which job to take, but rather whether you should gamble on turning down a job in this economy.
BE90micoperator is offline  
Old 01-08-2009, 05:17 PM
  #20  
Tuk er jerbs!
 
NightIP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: B747 Left
Posts: 1,342
Default

Originally Posted by labbats View Post
Good point. However, you aren't the one hiring. After 3 years at Flight Express you can get a job at a regional. After 3 years at Great Lakes (and making captain after 1.5 years) you can go anywhere.

I flew at Flight Express and while you'll get more time off, you'll actually have less of a life. It's hard to meet girls when you get off at 5am and have no real co-workers. While Great Lakes isn't a great job, it meets the requirements for moving on to bigger and better things and Denver is a great city filled with fun people and things to do.
That's a very valid point, and when the times are good and you can get a quick upgrade I don't know anyone who'd turn that down. But if times are tough and you sit at the bottom of the list as an FO for a long stretch and end up with a furlough letter, where are you then?

That was my problem. I got into an RJ with 900 hours and racked up a decent amount of turbine SIC, only to get a furlough letter. When I hit the street there were 37000 other people with just as much, if not more, turbine SIC than I had. Hell, I'd say every 1 in 3 people you meet walking down the street have some turbine SIC from something. It just doesn't separate you from the pack. Guys with a bunch of turbine SIC are a dime a dozen.

Here's where I think the OP can stand out a bit: at 21, things can change in the next 2 years before he's eligible for upgrade. If he does lose his seat between now and then he's not left with anything that makes him any different than anyone else. What can make him stand out on a resume is a solid amount of 135 PIC now, then in a couple years when he can qualify for an ATP he'll be able to rack up as much turbine SIC (and eventually PIC) as he can get, knowing that he has a well-rounded resume.

JMHO.
NightIP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Theonemarine
PSA Airlines
67
05-16-2016 04:13 PM
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
17
11-20-2008 06:10 AM
Nightflight
Part 135
13
10-31-2008 10:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices