New Minimums For All
03-08-2009 | 02:21 PM
#131
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: BEECH 1900 PIC
Believe it, if you want the details, I will be more than glad to give them to you. If you want the POI's name as well as the letter from the FAA in Washington stating the applicability of the program, that can be arranged as well.
03-08-2009 | 03:38 PM
#133
Doing One Pilot's Job
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 123
If the PFT pilot is logging 91 legs only then I see that, but a non-135 qualified pilot logging "sole manipulator" PIC on a live 135 leg goes against everything I've ever heard or known about 135 operations.
03-08-2009 | 04:11 PM
#135
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: BEECH 1900 PIC
Yeah, actually I would like to see a copy of such a LoA. Also be curious to know the company, FSDO, and inspector's name authorizing such nonsense.
If the PFT pilot is logging 91 legs only then I see that, but a non-135 qualified pilot logging "sole manipulator" PIC on a live 135 leg goes against everything I've ever heard or known about 135 operations.
If the PFT pilot is logging 91 legs only then I see that, but a non-135 qualified pilot logging "sole manipulator" PIC on a live 135 leg goes against everything I've ever heard or known about 135 operations.
Who said he was non qualified? Receives the same training as PIC, takes same checkride as PIC. Only requirement he does not meet is the time requirements to "ACT" as PIC of a 135 on demand cargo operation. As long as an authorized company PIC is sitting next to him, he can not only manipulate the controls, he can log this time as PIC per the FAA's authorization of the program. By the way, this program has been in affect for the last 14 years on a 135 certificate thats 40 years old. No offense, just because you have not seen or heard of such a thing, does not mean it does not exist, or is not legal. Hate to burst your bubble.
03-08-2009 | 04:21 PM
#136
Doing One Pilot's Job
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 123
Originally Posted by johnnysnow
No offense, just because you have seen or heard of such a thing, does not mean it does not exist, or is not legal. Hate to burst your bubble.
With that said, I still don't see how a pilot so much as legally log PIC on a live 135 leg if they don't met the requirements of 135.243, even if they have successfully completed 135.293/.297/.299 rides. Such authority would have to be written into their OpSpecs, wouldn't it?
I know Airnet has an SIC program...but those people aren't logging PIC are they?
Feel free to PM the name of that company...I enjoy learning new things!
03-08-2009 | 07:29 PM
#137
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: 717 FO
With that said, I still don't see how a pilot so much as legally log PIC on a live 135 leg if they don't met the requirements of 135.243, even if they have successfully completed 135.293/.297/.299 rides. Such authority would have to be written into their OpSpecs, wouldn't it?
I know Airnet has an SIC program...but those people aren't logging PIC are they?
I hope that helps.
03-08-2009 | 07:46 PM
#138
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Cessna 152 Captain
03-08-2009 | 08:01 PM
#139
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: I am the Stig
At Airnet the Baron SIC's were absolutely logging PIC on the 135 legs. Johnnysnow is right. They go through the same training and take the same check ride as the PIC qualified folks. Because they had passed that check ride they are able to manipulate the controls on 135 legs and can log PIC according to part 61.51 (e). They don't log any time as SIC because the baron is only a single pilot airplane.
I hope that helps.
I hope that helps.
"no certificate holder may use a person, nor may any person serve, as pilot in command of an aircraft under IFR unless that person--
(1) Holds at least a commercial pilot certificate with appropriate category and class ratings and, if required, an appropriate type rating for that aircraft; and
(2) Has had at least 1,200 hours of flight time as a pilot, including 500 hours of cross country flight time, 100 hours of night flight time, and 75 hours of actual or simulated instrument time at least 50 hours of which were in actual flight; and"
Also, I believe there is a reg that if you have a something along the lines of a postal contract, there must be an operating autopilot OR and SIC on the aircraft. Can't remember where that's at exactly, it's been a long time since I had to look at it.
03-08-2009 | 08:09 PM
#140
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Now, before you start beating me over the head with a hammer, I am in no way advocating the hiring of low time pilots. I'm not necessarily against it either. I'm just saying it's been done before. The difference is of course the era.
Sixty years ago, an 18 year old was a man. He was expected to be hard working , responsible, and full of character. My grandfather who was part of that generation, held a full time job, while attending high school, and enlisted in the military after graduation. Today he would be considered an over achiever. Back then he was normal. Today, young people rarely have these 3 traits together, if they have them at all. To all you younger folks out there who don't think this applies to you, than maybe it doesn't. There are exceptions to every rule, and maybe your that exception, or maybe your not. I'm inclined to think as a general rule, the later is true.
Sixty years ago, an 18 year old was a man. He was expected to be hard working , responsible, and full of character. My grandfather who was part of that generation, held a full time job, while attending high school, and enlisted in the military after graduation. Today he would be considered an over achiever. Back then he was normal. Today, young people rarely have these 3 traits together, if they have them at all. To all you younger folks out there who don't think this applies to you, than maybe it doesn't. There are exceptions to every rule, and maybe your that exception, or maybe your not. I'm inclined to think as a general rule, the later is true.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
