Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Are there any PROFESSIONAL pilots left? >

Are there any PROFESSIONAL pilots left?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Are there any PROFESSIONAL pilots left?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2009 | 08:29 AM
  #101  
CaptKrunch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: LeftSeat PA-44
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up
That thinking is so foolish that it's laughable, if it wasn't so pathetic.

It's obvious that you don't have a even a clue about labor negotiations. The people that negotiate from the other side of the table respect ONLY POWER, and for the airline pilot, that's the potential to COST THEM MONEY by invoking self-help. It doesn't matter what you look like. Management does NOT respect you. You are a cost unit to be beaten down to the lowest possible level.

The fact that your pants have a fresh pressing has absolutely ZERO to do with ANYTHING.

The vast majority of airline pilots look just fine. It's a big organization and you're always going to have a few slobs, but forget it and drive on. There are a lot bigger fish to fry in this job than that.
You know there is a lot to be said about appearance. Someone who looks sharp commands more respect than someone who is sloppy. Many airlines are getting rid of the hats, the jackets, the wings. I have heard some pilots say they would want to fly in street clothes.
Reply
Old 04-16-2009 | 08:57 AM
  #102  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Maybe you should be. Do people stop and correct these pilots who are bringing down the image of your company? It is called policing your own and it is a hard thing to do honestly; but it usually makes for a more proud, more professional core group.

USMCFLYR
If I thought these people were actually bringing the pay down I would say something but they aren't. It doesn't bother me if someone brings a back pack to work. The last guy I flew with had one. He was an FFDO. I know guys who bring laptop bags and guitars too. I've yet to see anyone walking through a terminal with an Ipod on. I'm sure they are out there but it is such a small percentage that it really isn't worth my time.
Reply
Old 04-16-2009 | 09:55 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by elcid79
Wear your hats, clean your uniforms, show up to work, and do you jobs to the best of your ability so that we can show the company that we actually care about our jobs, that we are professionals and as such we deserve respect. maby then our negotiators will have a foot to stand on.
If you think about it, from the first year pay perspective. My monthly pay after taxes was the equivalent of the cost for the company to operate the jet from the gate to the runway in ORD for one flight. So obviously, it's not about hats and clean shoes. I'm sure management appreciates our hard work but rewarding it is another matter.
Reply
Old 04-16-2009 | 12:02 PM
  #104  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
If I thought these people were actually bringing the pay down I would say something but they aren't. It doesn't bother me if someone brings a back pack to work. The last guy I flew with had one. He was an FFDO. I know guys who bring laptop bags and guitars too. I've yet to see anyone walking through a terminal with an Ipod on. I'm sure they are out there but it is such a small percentage that it really isn't worth my time.
I don't care what they bring to work....if it isn't right then they shouldn't do it. If that guy you flew with was a FFDO and is authorized to carry a backpack in some manner then he isn't breaking the rules. They can carrying guitars or laptops as long as they are carried appropriately.

I'll add to that remark that I don't know if it is against your company's RULES or not. The military has rules against such things (which have changed recently btw). They have gotten less restrict on some matters (like wearing a backpack) and tighter on others (like the use of a cellphone); but the fact is that IF there are rules then the employees should follow them. That is the aspect of professionalism that I am talking about. Why does the professionalism, or the lack of it, in your mind only revolve around whether it is reducing the pay? An E-2 with a family is probably making about as much (possibly less) as a first year FO at a low paying regional - but I still expect the E-2 to wear the uniform correctly and conduct himself in a professional manner since he is representing the US military; and if not then actions can be undertaken to correct the problem.

If it is against the company's rules and you are disobeying those rules - why would I think that you should be paid more? If you can't follow a simple rule like wearing your jacket or your hat - then why should I believe that I you are following rules such as whether an aircraft is safe to fly or not - or crew rest rules - or any other safety related rules?

If there aren't rules in place that prohibit wearing backpacks or your hat indoors, or grooming standards, then it is one person's opinion against anothers - and then NO ONE WILL BE RIGHT and you can do as you wish. Like Ben Wade said in' 3:10 To Yuma' [Every man's actions are right in his own eyes]

Btw - I'm not talking to you personally in this post Eric Stratton, I'm talking about the profession in general across the industry. I agree with you Eric in that since I have been on this board and read the comments I have taken a particular interest in finding these unprofessional pilots that people say are rampant in the industry and so far....I'm glad to report....I haven't seen them. As I said in an earlier post - thank you to all those professional pilots for the jobs you do getting me from point A to point B. I appreciate it.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-16-2009 | 03:28 PM
  #105  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

USMCFLYR

The reason I was talking about pay is someone said if everyone looked professional (no back packs or ipods) that we could get higher pay. They eluded to it being one of the reasons for falling pay and working conditions. I thought you were making that same conclusion. Sorry if you weren't. My argument isn't that they are breaking company policy (they might be), it's whether they are professional or not by carrying a back pack, etc. I don't see how having a back pack is being unprofessional. I've brought one with me because I was leaving for vacation after my trip and didn't have the room in my roller bag. I didn't look or act any different other than having a back pack. The companies bag room has stuff stolen out of there constantly and there response when something is stolen. "Sucks to be you"

As for the hat, I'm not a fan and it just doesn't bother me if others don't wear it. I wear mine but will take it off if I get over heated or a headache. Neither of which I believe are being unprofessional.

Everyone breaks rules now and then. That's why they ask that question during interviews. (what regs have you broken) Just because someone doesn't wear the hat or jacket doesn't mean they are going to be unsafe. I knew a guy who would simulate engine failures on empty legs and he was all about looking sharp.

I think the original poster probably had a bad trip because the title of this thread is ridiculous when you think about it.
Reply
Old 04-16-2009 | 07:45 PM
  #106  
SaltyDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
From: Leftof longitudinal
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I don't care what they bring to work....if it isn't right then they shouldn't do it. If that guy you flew with was a FFDO and is authorized to carry a backpack in some manner then he isn't breaking the rules. They can carrying guitars or laptops as long as they are carried appropriately.

I'll add to that remark that I don't know if it is against your company's RULES or not. The military has rules against such things (which have changed recently btw). They have gotten less restrict on some matters (like wearing a backpack) and tighter on others (like the use of a cellphone); but the fact is that IF there are rules then the employees should follow them. That is the aspect of professionalism that I am talking about. Why does the professionalism, or the lack of it, in your mind only revolve around whether it is reducing the pay? An E-2 with a family is probably making about as much (possibly less) as a first year FO at a low paying regional - but I still expect the E-2 to wear the uniform correctly and conduct himself in a professional manner since he is representing the US military; and if not then actions can be undertaken to correct the problem.

If it is against the company's rules and you are disobeying those rules - why would I think that you should be paid more? If you can't follow a simple rule like wearing your jacket or your hat - then why should I believe that I you are following rules such as whether an aircraft is safe to fly or not - or crew rest rules - or any other safety related rules?

If there aren't rules in place that prohibit wearing backpacks or your hat indoors, or grooming standards, then it is one person's opinion against anothers - and then NO ONE WILL BE RIGHT and you can do as you wish. Like Ben Wade said in' 3:10 To Yuma' [Every man's actions are right in his own eyes]

Btw - I'm not talking to you personally in this post Eric Stratton, I'm talking about the profession in general across the industry. I agree with you Eric in that since I have been on this board and read the comments I have taken a particular interest in finding these unprofessional pilots that people say are rampant in the industry and so far....I'm glad to report....I haven't seen them. As I said in an earlier post - thank you to all those professional pilots for the jobs you do getting me from point A to point B. I appreciate it.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR,
As a fellow proud, professional military service professional, do have a slightly different perspective. I look at anyone who volunteers to serve in the military/firefighters/law enforcement differently than non military. I have much higher standards in more facets of their lives than I do in my fellow commercial airline pilots. In the commercial airlines, I get paid to move equipment. I am not paid to risk my life for said employer like the other professional groups that are knowingly risking their lives.
Another difference, and to me significant: Military treats servicemembers with a unique respect and appreciation. Most airline management teams have mostly just disdain for their pilot employees. Certainly little to no appreciation.
The total lack of respect by management manifests itself in uniform wear since many aren't all that proud to be employees of a company that has so little respect. I'd venture to guess that the better a professional is treated at their employers, the more professional they present themselves.
As long as my fellow pilots fly professional in the cockpit, I don't care if they wear bozo the clown outfits. It ain't the military <g>
Reply
Old 04-17-2009 | 06:00 AM
  #107  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default Uniform

Just after 9-11 it was suggested that pilots wear street clothes so that they could blend in with the passengers. The reason was so that they would not be a target for terrorists.

The FAA put a stop to is since they felt that during an emergency the four bars would command respect from the passengers.

Imagine going to work in business casual. I took a maintenance ferry flight once in the 757 wearing a polo and blue jeans. It felt strange.

Skyhigh
Reply
Old 04-17-2009 | 06:41 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Just after 9-11 it was suggested that pilots wear street clothes so that they could blend in with the passengers. The reason was so that they would not be a target for terrorists.

The FAA put a stop to is since they felt that during an emergency the four bars would command respect from the passengers.

Imagine going to work in business casual. I took a maintenance ferry flight once in the 757 wearing a polo and blue jeans. It felt strange.

Skyhigh
I call BS. There is no FAA requirement for having the bars. Besides, look at Virgin America's uniforms.
Reply
Old 04-17-2009 | 07:05 AM
  #109  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Just after 9-11 it was suggested that pilots wear street clothes so that they could blend in with the passengers. The reason was so that they would not be a target for terrorists.

The FAA put a stop to is since they felt that during an emergency the four bars would command respect from the passengers.

Imagine going to work in business casual. I took a maintenance ferry flight once in the 757 wearing a polo and blue jeans. It felt strange.

Skyhigh
I've ferried planes in street cloths and it felt great. I can imagine going to work in business casual. It'll never happen though.
Reply
Old 04-17-2009 | 07:36 AM
  #110  
Aviatormar's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: CH2T Worst plane ever
Default

I received permission from my company to operate the last day of a 4 day trip in street clothes, it was glorious.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fit29
Major
31
05-28-2009 12:01 PM
Denny Crane
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
12-09-2008 03:48 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM
Redwood
Major
74
09-06-2008 06:06 AM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices