Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat >

Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pilot Lifestyle Under Threat

Old 05-14-2009 | 01:23 PM
  #61  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by sig598
Here's a wacky idea:

How about an unpaid deadhead to start your trip which arrives just prior to check-in? And "just prior to checkin" means you dont have to take the 5am departure to get to Atlanta for a 4pm check-in. This deadhead would be included in duty time. Even a guaranteed cockpit or flight attendant jumpseat would be ok. This really wouldnt cost much more than the seat youre taking up. And either way, youre going to be taking up a seat for your commute.
thats what Netjets does, You just have to live in or near one of their designated airports so they can get you where they need you. Not really a whacky idea. We can book ourselves on jumpseats and nonrev listings already so why not be able to book ourselves positive space to and from work? Sure they will say "we're taking up revenue seats" but whats the alternative? It would likely save on sick calls due to not being able to commute in for a trip also. They could give an incentive to those who choose to just live in base. You either take the PS commute or live in base for a yearly bonus. easy enough, but will likely never happen. bean counters will just see it as the employees taking money out of their pockets
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:24 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by mnpilot
I just emailed my local congressman, both state senators and the president asking them to do something about this. I work at the company under investigation and I am tired of them taking advantage of us. Something has to be done.
What do you expect them to do? You have voluntarily accepted employment with your company and can leave at any time.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:26 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
thats what Netjets does, You just have to live in or near one of their designated airports so they can get you where they need you. Not really a whacky idea.
Question. Can Netjets do this because of the nature of their business? i.e., because they don't run a hub-and-spoke system it seems like they have to provide this in order to get the crew to the aircraft.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:32 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Watching Law & Order on reserve
Default

Originally Posted by Lab Rat
I do not intend to rain on anyone's parade, but I would like to make a comment. The ability to live anywhere you choose and commute to work is a privilege afforded by the nature of the industry and not a right that your employer is obligated to provide for you.

What many people have forgotten is that you go to where the jobs are and work your lifestyle into the demands of it. Yes, NYC and L.A. are expensive places to live, but if that is where the job is you make it work. If you can successfully commute into your job then that is a good thing. If not, you better have an alternate means, and demanding your employer adjust their schedule to meet your needs is unrealistic in most career fields - especially when supply and demand is not in your favor.

That is a completely true statement. Youre not raining on my parade. However, airline industry has been constanly evolving since inception. Therefore, it is my arguement that our perceptions about commuting, pay and work rules should change as well. In the 80s, it used to be that if you lived in Georgia and wanted a commuter job, you worked for ASA and "commuted" to the big city. Now, everything has changed. The world (including the regional world) has gone global. Regionals are no longer just flying E110's to Macon and Muscle Shoals. However, starting pay still blows and people have to move all around the country to get these jobs. How about rewarding your employees with a ride to work? And, as I said, there could be restrictions. Possibly, required to live within a 2 hour flight of your base? Just throwing this out for discussion.

And, by the way, the only rights that your employer is obligated to provide to you, are the rights we negotiate. You dont get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. That may sound immoral, but it is a business basic.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:35 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Watching Law & Order on reserve
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
thats what Netjets does, You just have to live in or near one of their designated airports so they can get you where they need you. Not really a whacky idea. We can book ourselves on jumpseats and nonrev listings already so why not be able to book ourselves positive space to and from work? Sure they will say "we're taking up revenue seats" but whats the alternative? It would likely save on sick calls due to not being able to commute in for a trip also. They could give an incentive to those who choose to just live in base. You either take the PS commute or live in base for a yearly bonus. easy enough, but will likely never happen. bean counters will just see it as the employees taking money out of their pockets
Completely agree. I betcha RA gets a positive space pass to work.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:37 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Jet Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by sig598
That is a completely true statement. Youre not raining on my parade. However, airline industry has been constanly evolving since inception. Therefore, it is my arguement that our perceptions about commuting, pay and work rules should change as well. In the 80s, it used to be that if you lived in Georgia and wanted a commuter job, you worked for ASA and "commuted" to the big city. Now, everything has changed. The world (including the regional world) has gone global. Regionals are no longer just flying E110's to Macon and Muscle Shoals. However, starting pay still blows and people have to move all around the country to get these jobs. How about rewarding your employees with a ride to work? And, as I said, there could be restrictions. Possibly, required to live within a 2 hour flight of your base? Just throwing this out for discussion.

And, by the way, the only rights that your employer is obligated to provide to you, are the rights we negotiate. You dont get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. That may sound immoral, but it is a business basic.
Very good points. You could try to negotiate commercial tickets and/or paid company deadheads for trips that may begin out of domicile. That is where I would start if you wanted to pursue an avenue which eased the commute. True, there might be many lines that would begin in domicile, but seniority would be the factor in who gets and who does not.

And, by the way, the only rights that your employer is obligated to provide to you, are the rights we negotiate. You dont get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. That may sound immoral, but it is a business basic.
Very true, but not immoral. Your job is to negotiate the entire pie, your employers job is to negotiate to you only a small sliver. It would be immoral (well, unethical is probably a better word) if either side did not work to the best of their ability.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:39 PM
  #67  
captjns's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
10M Airline Miles
20 Years
150 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,230
Likes: 62
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Default

Question to the feeder pilots… When you interviewed, did you know where your base was going to be? During basic indoctrination, didn't the instructor point out that the use crew room as a rest area prohibited? Weren’t you all warned about the evils of long distance commutes? Did not the subject of crash pads come up during training? Did you expect by some miracle that your salaries would actually start as some livable wage rather than $1,500 per month? Were you all so naïve to think that you would be treated with respect by your company? Those with young wife and child(ren), did you really think this through and consider their feelings and sacrifices? How many of you in your twenties are lucky enough to have generous parents still willing to supplement your income? With all of this in mind, all of you accepted those substandard conditions. Why?
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:45 PM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Watching Law & Order on reserve
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
Question to the feeder pilots… When you interviewed, did you know where your base was going to be? During basic indoctrination, didn't the instructor point out that the use crew room as a rest area prohibited? Weren’t you all warned about the evils of long distance commutes? Did not the subject of crash pads come up during training? Did you expect by some miracle that your salaries would actually start as some livable wage rather than $1,500 per month? Were you all so naïve to think that you would be treated with respect by your company? Those with young wife and child(ren), did you really think this through and consider their feelings and sacrifices? How many of you in your twenties are lucky enough to have generous parents still willing to supplement your income? With all of this in mind, all of you accepted those substandard conditions. Why?
The theory was that you would do this for a year or two until moving on to bigger and better things. Doctors have poorly paid residencies with awful QOL. Everyone pays their dues (hopefully). This "feeder airline" step wasnt supposed to last 15 years.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:45 PM
  #69  
KingAirPIC's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default

An airline can't tell you where to live. It will never fly.
Reply
Old 05-14-2009 | 01:53 PM
  #70  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by Lab Rat
Question. Can Netjets do this because of the nature of their business? i.e., because they don't run a hub-and-spoke system it seems like they have to provide this in order to get the crew to the aircraft.
I dont really care why they do it i just said they do it. They do it because they need to ensure their pilots are in position to fly an aircraft.

Also just because the majors have a hub and spoke systems doesnt mean they dont need to have their pilots in position for a flight. When i have training i can book myself positive space to training so why not other times? If i commute on my own and the seats open then its the same situation. It costs the company nothing to allow a positive space seat on their own airline. Now if the planes full then sure you're taking up space but thats what a jumpseat is for. At nwa the Jumpseat has been added to the BOW and CANNOT be weight restricted. If all airlines did this then that would help tremendously for people trying to get to and from work.

Point is that there are alternatives out there that could be explored but the bean counters will always find a way to justify skimping out of it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeepcrawln
Hiring News
7
05-02-2009 04:13 AM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices