![]() |
Originally Posted by HookEm
(Post 610505)
And what of the recent FedEx MD-11 accident?
Military flight training is recognized as the best in the world yet they still managed to make mistakes and it cost them their lives. Was their "foundation" flawed in some way? Gulfstream doesn't train pilots on the Q400 or the CRJ. Making sure those pilots are properly trained and fit for duty rests solely on the companies that hired them and trained them. Your opinion on Gulfstream is recognized but to try and put the blame on a company that has no control over pilots once they leave is a bit of a stretch. I'd be willing to bet the NTSB doesn't cite Gulfstream Training Academy in it's probably cause section. |
Not letting an aircraft get slow is Flying 101. Doesn't matter what airframe it is CRJ or 1900.
Where did the captain learn Flying 101? |
Originally Posted by rightside02
(Post 610495)
What does his 250 hours at Gulfstream have anything to do with what he decided to do 3 years later in a CRJ 200 at FL 410 ???
Students retain information they learn for the first time longer than they retain information they must relearn. Unlearning incorrect procedures (or bad habits) is always more difficult than learning the correct procedures. The most impressionable experiences (good or bad) occur during primary flight training. Remember, it's not just skill students are learning, it's also airmanship, or judgment inside the aircraft. I'm not bashing Gulfstream or those pilots who attended this school. But to somehow imply that those 250 hours are wiped clean by the proceeding 3500 hrs is in every expert's opinion incorrect. The first 250 hrs shape a pilot. The curves will change over time, but the shape will stay the same. Unless, the pilot is broken down and built back up again. This is something we all know the regionals are not in the habit of doing. That being said, contrary to your opinion, the first 250 hours have everything to do with what you do in the cockpit 3 years later. |
There are plenty of Gulfstream pilots flying at the majors. They have no problems. I'd find another excuse other than the "generic" Gulfstream argument.
On another note: My wife with 10 hours dual from 15 years ago was watching the Colgan thing on the news. After hearing what the crew did, she said out loud, "You're supposed to push forward in a stall, not pull back." She never soloed and knew what to do. :confused: |
Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
(Post 610475)
The last 3 fatal airline crashes Were Colgan, Comair 5191, and Pinnacle 3701
Colgans Captain = Gulfstream Comair's Captain = Gulfstream Both Pinnacle Pilots = Gulfstream Facts are facts |
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 610512)
As far as I know the FedEx MD-11 crash is still being investigated.
|
Originally Posted by johnnysnow
(Post 610545)
Anybody who has ever flight instructed knows the answer to this one. Law of Primacy.
Students retain information they learn for the first time longer than they retain information they must relearn. Unlearning incorrect procedures (or bad habits) is always more difficult than learning the correct procedures. The most impressionable experiences (good or bad) occur during primary flight training. Remember, it's not just skill students are learning, it's also airmanship, or judgment inside the aircraft. I'm not bashing Gulfstream or those pilots who attended this school. But to somehow imply that those 250 hours are wiped clean by the proceeding 3500 hrs is in every expert's opinion incorrect. The first 250 hrs shape a pilot. The curves will change over time, but the shape will stay the same. Unless, the pilot is broken down and built back up again. This is something we all know the regionals are not in the habit of doing. That being said, contrary to your opinion, the first 250 hours have everything to do with what you do in the cockpit 3 years later. I think this whole accident is more of a discipline issue that a "where did he learned to shoot a ILS issue". lack of professionalism is a daily decision nothing to do with what you learned at Gulfstream or at your mom and pa's FBO years ago. |
Isn't a checkride the same regardless of the background of the pilot?
|
Originally Posted by Dangling Unit
(Post 610566)
Isn't a checkride the same regardless of the background of the pilot?
|
Originally Posted by BURflyer
(Post 610559)
Very interesting. As far as I know GA isn't a flight school, just PFT for those that already have the licenses. But from my experience all of the former GA pilots that I have come across, which were three, were very bad pilots with history of training and checkride failures. I'm sure it's not the norm but it does make you wonder.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands