Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers >

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2009 | 06:42 PM
  #291  
TPROP4ever's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: none ya...
Default

Originally Posted by Chente
250:
LOL.....so sorry man.....That post was intended for trop...the other side of the argument. I agree 100% with everything you have said on here. My bad dude
Oh so was it me?....
Reply
Old 07-31-2009 | 07:59 PM
  #292  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

I'm not sure why everyone keeps saying "you should instruct, fly freight and then get hired on at a regional because thats the way it used to be!" Well thats bull ****.

I started flying in 1991. I got hired with an airline in 2000. I either learned to fly or taught at three different flight schools in two states, one a major university. Of all of the pilots I met only one went and did single pilot cargo in order to get to a regional and that was because they were unfairly turned down earlier. In the long run, it didn't help them get a better job as they are still doing the regional gig as most in our grouip of friends went on to mainline 121, which is shame they deserve to be here too.

Most instructed until they were hired, usually 200ME was the key and total time ranged from 1000-2000 hours. Except for one who did the SIC Airnet program where you got hired as a SIC on a Navajo, the cargo folks I saw wanted to be corporate or avoid PFT, but in reality they just became corporate. That SIC at Airnet did that program to avoid becoming a CFI and was hired at a regional before becoming a PIC and they had to of course pay Airnet back or something like that. The other cargo I saw was one who got turned down from several regionals before doing cargo and finally get hired in.

Now I think someone needs to introduce into this bill a provision dropping Part 135 PIC cargo in non-turbine aircraft down to less than 1200TT. I think that is overdue.

Personally, I think you should have to be a CFII to get hired as an airline pilot.
Reply
Old 07-31-2009 | 09:19 PM
  #293  
YugoDriver's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: lazy boy
Default

It should be interesting to see the airlines find qualified pilots in a few years when this new 1500hr./atp rule and the age 65 retirements all kicking in at about the same time.
Reply
Old 07-31-2009 | 09:32 PM
  #294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Smile

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever
Oh so was it me?....
Yes it was intended for you. No disrespect but I disagree with you on many levels. Again, I can see some valid points in your arguments but overall I dont agree with many of the things you have posted. Just a difference of opinion is all
Reply
Old 07-31-2009 | 10:53 PM
  #295  
250 or point 65's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I'm not sure why everyone keeps saying "you should instruct, fly freight and then get hired on at a regional because thats the way it used to be!" Well thats bull ****.
I don't think that anyone is saying that. Career progression happens in many different ways. What many people are saying is that you should have SOME kind of real PIC experience prior to being an airline pilot. CFI or freight or banner tow or traffic watch or part 91 or something where you've had to make and live with decisions.

I'd also like to bring up a point. People against this seem to be saying that 1500 is some random number, as if congress just said, POOF! 1500. Its not really that they are saying 1500, its that they are saying you need an ATP...the FAA said 1500.
Reply
Old 08-01-2009 | 03:29 AM
  #296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

Some unintended consequences of the 1,500 hour & ATP rule.

In about one year after passage of the law the regional flight school mills will have a shrinking enrollment base. This is do to the amount TT a graduate has, the three year window to get an ATP and the amount of hours one could fly per year to build up to the 1,500 hours. At some point regionals will demand an ATP upon hire as the three year window will be closing and they don't want to be in a position of hiring and training only to let someone go because they won't have an ATP by the deadline. Flight schools mills will greatly downsize or go out of business.

Flight instructors will get dirt pay as they can't jump to regionals with 400TT.

Freight operators will pay dirt as guys/gals want to build time. We may even see some of those pay us to fly as SIC to build time deals. Even IFR Part 135 demand 1,200tt.

I think many new folks will bypass flying as a career.
Reply
Old 08-01-2009 | 03:42 AM
  #297  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Skywest poolie
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusA320
Some unintended consequences of the 1,500 hour & ATP rule.

In about one year after passage of the law the regional flight school mills will have a shrinking enrollment base. This is do to the amount TT a graduate has, the three year window to get an ATP and the amount of hours one could fly per year to build up to the 1,500 hours. At some point regionals will demand an ATP upon hire as the three year window will be closing and they don't want to be in a position of hiring and training only to let someone go because they won't have an ATP by the deadline. Flight schools mills will greatly downsize or go out of business.

Flight instructors will get dirt pay as they can't jump to regionals with 400TT.

Freight operators will pay dirt as guys/gals want to build time. We may even see some of those pay us to fly as SIC to build time deals. Even IFR Part 135 demand 1,200tt.

I think many new folks will bypass flying as a career.
Bad news for guys wanting to start out - good for the profession.
Reply
Old 08-01-2009 | 04:57 AM
  #298  
TPROP4ever's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: none ya...
Default

Originally Posted by Chente
Yes it was intended for you. No disrespect but I disagree with you on many levels. Again, I can see some valid points in your arguments but overall I dont agree with many of the things you have posted. Just a difference of opinion is all

No problem, my opinions have always been mine....I guess Its a good thing though because one thing I have noticed with this thread for the first time in awhile on APC, people are having a frank discussion about a very important topic, and its remaining very civil. I think the fact that this thread has gone this way shows us that truly even if we disagree we can have a very meaningful conversation that at least gets us all talking about very important things facing this industry. It has been a long time since I have enjoeyed a thread this much, even the differing opinions
Reply
Old 08-01-2009 | 05:10 AM
  #299  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: I only fly multi-winged airplanes.
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Originally Posted by CaptainTeezy
It will be a huge test to CFI in a C172 for 1500 hours. A test of skill and will.



Quoted for gospel...

Guys did it this way since the dawn of time. Kids these days...sheesh...

I HARDLY flew my tail off CFIing. Took some time off to go back to school, and once I went back to the CFI gig, found myself doing stagecheck pilot stuff, where I flew less than your average bear.

It STILL only took me 3 years to go from wet-CFI to commuter gig (which, BTW, required ATP mins), and that was in the middle of a recession. I learned a METRIC ton of information in that time, including how to run an aviation operation filled with recalcitrant, irritating, stubborn people (AKA pilots), evaluate students, how to get a new syllabus approved from scratch in a 141 op, deal with the FAA on a regular, professional basis, as well as countless other "skill sets".

So spare us all the "woe is me, I have to fly a new 172 with G1000" malarky. No one except your fellow millenial whiners wants to hear it. Man up and get it done.

Nu

I am not sure if you think I am the "woe is me..." guy but that is far from the truth...who exactly are you talking to? My point was that the guys that really want it will have the desire to instruct for 1500 hours and you cant half ass 1500 hours or you will do something to get a bad mark or your certificate. My point was that 1500 hours will be a good test of ones skill and will (desire).

I instructed to ATP mins,got my ATP and am doing the 135 freight gig. So I believe I am getting done what little there is to get done right now.
Reply
Old 08-01-2009 | 05:58 AM
  #300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Now I think someone needs to introduce into this bill a provision dropping Part 135 PIC cargo in non-turbine aircraft down to less than 1200TT. I think that is overdue.
No


Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Personally, I think you should have to be a CFII to get hired as an airline pilot.
and no.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices