Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
highlights of the Pinnacle TA >

highlights of the Pinnacle TA

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

highlights of the Pinnacle TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2009 | 09:02 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Chrysler Pacifica
Default

Wow, I just saw the pay rates that were posted and figured I would put some of those numbers in perspective.

Back in the day, when I was hired as a regional FO, 3rd year pay was $36 an hour for a 50 seat RJ. Considering that was back in early 2001, if you adjust for inflation (and by the way, inflation is inevitably going to rise faster here pretty soon with the printing press running all day), that equates to $44 an hour in 2009 dollars.
18 year Capt pay was $100 an hour in 2001, which would mean $122 an hour in 2009 dollars. There were also a ton of "soft pay" clauses included.
The contract back then was not considered spectacular by any stretch of the imagination and the average longevity at the company was well under 5 years.
How the hell can ALPA and all the regional pilots let such a joke of a contract go through at a time when they are facing the prospect of many years, if not their entire career spent with their current outfit? I always imagined that new contracts were supposed to set the bar, not lower it! Considering how profitable and powerful these regionals have become, how can there be any excuse to ratify such garbage?
I wish you all luck and simply wanted to point out the massive downward slide that has afflicted the small carriers, and to think it was done at the expense of the majors only makes it more outrageous. Talk about shooting yourself in both feet! Terrifying stuff.......
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 09:46 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blueridger
Wow, I just saw the pay rates that were posted and figured I would put some of those numbers in perspective.

Back in the day, when I was hired as a regional FO, 3rd year pay was $36 an hour for a 50 seat RJ. Considering that was back in early 2001, if you adjust for inflation (and by the way, inflation is inevitably going to rise faster here pretty soon with the printing press running all day), that equates to $44 an hour in 2009 dollars.
18 year Capt pay was $100 an hour in 2001, which would mean $122 an hour in 2009 dollars. There were also a ton of "soft pay" clauses included.
The contract back then was not considered spectacular by any stretch of the imagination and the average longevity at the company was well under 5 years.
How the hell can ALPA and all the regional pilots let such a joke of a contract go through at a time when they are facing the prospect of many years, if not their entire career spent with their current outfit? I always imagined that new contracts were supposed to set the bar, not lower it! Considering how profitable and powerful these regionals have become, how can there be any excuse to ratify such garbage?
I wish you all luck and simply wanted to point out the massive downward slide that has afflicted the small carriers, and to think it was done at the expense of the majors only makes it more outrageous. Talk about shooting yourself in both feet! Terrifying stuff.......
How is that contract today? Where did you work; Air Wisconsin or Comair?
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 10:18 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blueridger
Wow, I just saw the pay rates that were posted and figured I would put some of those numbers in perspective.

Back in the day, when I was hired as a regional FO, 3rd year pay was $36 an hour for a 50 seat RJ. Considering that was back in early 2001, if you adjust for inflation (and by the way, inflation is inevitably going to rise faster here pretty soon with the printing press running all day), that equates to $44 an hour in 2009 dollars.
18 year Capt pay was $100 an hour in 2001, which would mean $122 an hour in 2009 dollars. There were also a ton of "soft pay" clauses included.
The contract back then was not considered spectacular by any stretch of the imagination and the average longevity at the company was well under 5 years.
How the hell can ALPA and all the regional pilots let such a joke of a contract go through at a time when they are facing the prospect of many years, if not their entire career spent with their current outfit? I always imagined that new contracts were supposed to set the bar, not lower it! Considering how profitable and powerful these regionals have become, how can there be any excuse to ratify such garbage?
I wish you all luck and simply wanted to point out the massive downward slide that has afflicted the small carriers, and to think it was done at the expense of the majors only makes it more outrageous. Talk about shooting yourself in both feet! Terrifying stuff.......
ALPA can (and will) do it because it's in their financial best interest.

Strikes are expensive for national and if they fail, then there's a real possibility that that ALPA dues paying carrier will either be replaced with a non-ALPA carrier or just slowly dissolve. Either way, ALPA loses dues income which seems to be its primary concern today. It appears ALPA has become a business that needs to be able to continue to pay nice salaries and bennies to its staff and there must be assurances the collapse of pilots livelyhoods do not affect the bottom line income of ALPA, lest the pain pilots are undergoing transfer to Herndon.

Remember, any new contract must apparently first and foremost be good for both that company and the association. Pilots really don't matter.
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 10:31 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

That is a horible contract thats the reason aviation is in a downward slide.
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 10:34 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Chrysler Pacifica
Default

Originally Posted by Purpltail
How is that contract today? Where did you work; Air Wisconsin or Comair?
That contract no longer exists, same goes for the company.

ACA, great place to work back in the day.
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 10:35 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Chrysler Pacifica
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Pilots really don't matter.
In that case, that should be ALPA's new logo, just so everyone understands the association they are joining........
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 10:49 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blueridger
In that case, that should be ALPA's new logo, just so everyone understands the association they are joining........
Agreed, but don't forget that this philosophy ultimate hammers pilots at major carriers too, for as stated before, the more these regional contracts multiply, the more attractive the regional flown large RJ becomes and the harder it is for major airline pilot groups to hold on to what they have, let alone make progress themselves. If they get better contracts, that just widens the gap even further making these large RJ flying regionals even MORE attractive.

It's going to be an ever tightening spiral with the pilots of major carriers ultimately hurt the most as a result of weaker regional contracts and ALPA's faliure to be the take charge advocate that it once was, but has long since lost its way.

Personally, I think its way too late now and we can all watch mainline domestic flying continue to erode (along with jobs). Think about this..........at Eagle we're loaded down with very small jets (37 and 44 seat aircraft), yet STILL these aircraft are flown heavily instead of parked.

For most domestic flying, these airplanes are still more desirable then 140-seat S-80's sitting in the desert. Apparently their inefficiency is outweighed by inexpensive labor ACROSS THE BOARD (Agents, F/A's, mechanics, etc.)

If you think it's bad now, wait 10 years..............at that point, today will be part of the "good old days".

ALPA is whistling past the cemetary and has been for 20 years.
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 10:54 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
us

True about "buying power". But as long as the regionals DON'T pay any more money and maintain a increasingly stronger financial incentive to increase their flying, then mainline carriers (and their pilots) will suffer more.

The more expensive regional operators are, the less flying is likely to be shifted to them from mainline. It's an unfortunately inverse relationship that appears is becoming stronger.

Regional pilots are between a rock and a hard place because of it. If they agree to these weaker contracts, they're likely to improve their regional growth, stability and their own advancement within. The problem is that by doing that, they limit their liklyhood of ever making it to a major as the majors shrink to move flying over to regionals for greater profit.

The ultimate aviation Catch-22.
Nicely put!
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 05:47 PM
  #29  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
would you like me to post the cons, or just let us all have a kumbya moment? I'm watching football with Jack D and some friends (also upset pilots) so it could be therapeutic for me....?
wow...bit touchy aye? Did you read the whole post? It was Highlights mainly focusing on the good stuff but a synopsis of the bad was in there. FYI, I've already voted no and hope we can kill it. Just posting info.
Reply
Old 09-13-2009 | 06:06 PM
  #30  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 6
From: Bus driver
Default

Originally Posted by HIREME
wow...bit touchy aye? Did you read the whole post? It was Highlights mainly focusing on the good stuff but a synopsis of the bad was in there. FYI, I've already voted no and hope we can kill it. Just posting info.
It's all good- I feel much better after posting the con list. It's internet therapy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
laserman2431
Regional
30
02-23-2009 06:56 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Regional
39
10-11-2008 07:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices