Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Why were minimums so low? >

Why were minimums so low?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Why were minimums so low?

Old 09-20-2009 | 07:07 AM
  #1  
slipped's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default Why were minimums so low?

Back in 07 when you could get a job w/ a wet commercial?
Was it all demand based?
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 07:16 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Default

Easy...The company's has two options at that point to attract candidates.

A- Increase wages and incentives, and attract a much more qualified candidate and better pilot or.....

B- Literally lower minimums as low as they possibly could, knowing you'll have thousands of sub 1000 hour pilots willing to take a 20 thousand dollar a year job, just so they can play airline pilot.

Unfortunately it will always be like option B. No matter how much we say we won't accept these insanely low wages, there will always be a 1,000 more pile-it's that will...
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 07:16 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

Yes. You haven't been hiding under a rock the past couple years have you?

We couldn't get enough folks with higher times so mins were lowered. IMHO, mins won't be that low no time soon. If you're looking to get in, get your times up.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 1
From: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Default

Originally Posted by GrummanCT
Easy...The company's has two options at that point to attract candidates.

A- Increase wages and incentives, and attract a much more qualified candidate and better pilot or.....

B- Literally lower minimums as low as they possibly could, knowing you'll have thousands of sub 1000 hour pilots willing to take a 20 thousand dollar a year job, just so they can play airline pilot.

Unfortunately it will always be like option B. No matter how much we say we won't accept these insanely low wages, there will always be a 1,000 more pile-it's that will...
What are you talking about? Everybody was flying not too long ago, who were these "much more qualified" pilots you are talking about? There were quite a few eminently qualified persons who joined the regionals because it was the only game in town. Also, in my experience, more qualifications don't necessarily mean a person is a better pilot.

The reason 121 airlines hired sub 1000 hour pilots with little experience is because there was no one left to bring aboard.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 08:18 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by thevagabond
The reason 121 airlines hired sub 1000 hour pilots with little experience is because there was no one left to bring aboard.
Not even close.... the reason is because there were not enough experienced pilots who would accept those jobs... there are 2,000 pilots alone from AA on the street, and thousands more from countless other "real" airlines... there was NO shortage of experienced qualified pilots, there was a shortage of people willing to work for nothing.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 08:34 AM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: CRJ/FO
Default

"the reason is because there were not enough experienced pilots who would accept those jobs... there are 2,000 pilots alone from AA on the street, and thousands more from countless other "real" airlines... there was NO shortage of experienced qualified pilots, there was a shortage of people willing to work for nothing." -Nicely put Mason.

Until there is one source of pilots controled by pilots the labor side will suffer. Take a look at what it takes to become a union electrician. Step one, get a union card. Step two, go job hunting. One source, one path, and they set their pay rates. What happens when a Journeyman looses his job? He applies for another one at the same pay rate. The contractor still chooses who they hire so the best electricians stay employed.
I'd rather have a pilot's union set the standard of what a 121 pilot should be rather than the government or an airline.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 08:56 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
there was NO shortage of experienced qualified pilots, there was a shortage of people willing to work for nothing.
Is there a shortage of people willing to work for nothing now? Actually it's because there were more jobs than pilots could fill.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 09:01 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 1
From: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Not even close.... the reason is because there were not enough experienced pilots who would accept those jobs... there are 2,000 pilots alone from AA on the street, and thousands more from countless other "real" airlines... there was NO shortage of experienced qualified pilots, there was a shortage of people willing to work for nothing.
Good point although in fact some of those pilots from "real" airlines did join the regional ranks. More accurately, I should have said there was no one left to hire who wants to move on to a "real" airline who hasn't already
been there and is awaiting recall. Better? We all wish that our "regionals" were actually the smallest equipment at a "real" airline and that we were on a better seniority list. However, we didn't let that cat out of the bag and we're all just a little sensitive and weary of being blamed for a situation all you "real" pilots and deregulation created. We on the civilian side are simply playing the best hand we have to get a better job.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 09:37 AM
  #9  
Twin Wasp's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 1
From: Sr. VP of button pushing
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
Is there a shortage of people willing to work for nothing now?

Management would say there is!
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 09:43 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: 737/FO
Default

"Generally", a furloughed pilot, especially a major airline furloughee, is very low on the list to get hired in a new pilot position for the following reasons (assuming the furloughee is trying to get hired in a pilot position that may be a step back or sideways):

- Unless they are willing to give up their recall rights (most won't), they may leave at any time, possibly not allowing the new airline to recoup their training and employment cost.

- New airline doesn't want to pair the "experienced" furloughee with a potentially less experienced Captain. They are concerned about how the furloughee will feel and act "pulling gear for a kid".

- Perceived, or otherwise, potential for a "bad attitude" from the furloughee.

I remember interviewing several furloughed pilots. We didn't hire one. The company was much more interested in the pilot that saw the position as a step up instead of a step sideways or down.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
beebopbogo
Aviation Law
28
08-25-2009 05:06 PM
ugflyer
Regional
174
03-10-2009 09:47 PM
Bons
Hiring News
6
02-04-2009 02:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices