Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Republic - Three RAH subsidiaries, one list. >

Republic - Three RAH subsidiaries, one list.

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Republic - Three RAH subsidiaries, one list.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2010, 05:32 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joachim's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 746
Default

Originally Posted by Dirty Rat View Post
I don't want to hear that attitude from you when you are cranking my gear. The YX and F9 pilots do deserve higher. Why? None of us asked to work for your company. You bought us, you bought our experience and seniority. Deal with it Son.
Being that you represent the most pessimistic extreme of the YX pilot group, I am interested in what you think about RightSeatBallast's idea.
Joachim is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 05:49 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rightseat Ballast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: E170/175 CA
Posts: 334
Default

Originally Posted by frankwasright View Post
Thank god you're not an arbitrator ! More like a straight-up traitor ! Get off your knees and quit apologizing to the Mighty YX pilots ! So they hitched their wagons to a dying star-too bad,so sad.The "entitlement mentality" is all over this one-they "put in their time",so they're automatically "entitled" to all the capt. slots ? BS ! We don't have a national seniority list,in case you haven't heard,so that argument doesn't fly.Please publicly identify yourself,so you are never elected to any union position. Do you honestly think because somebody works/worked at YX/F9 they should all be senior to you ? Ever hear of "Stockholm syndrome" ? Try doing this and it will be "Nic 2010-The Sequel".How much did all that experience buy the TWA guys at AA ? Hmmm ?
Well, if you actually slow down and read my post, you will see that in no way did my theoretical proposal put all YX and F9 pilots at the top of the list, nor would all be entitled to captain spots. And as for Stockholm syndrome, that entails sympathizing with your captor/oppressor, and YX and F9 are in no way captors in this whole mess. Fairness requires empathy to some degree, and I am not apologetic for that.
Rightseat Ballast is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 06:07 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
This post was a good start, but career expectations leave one group 'holding the bag' in this proposal - the senior FO's of Midwest and Frontier. The RAH and Lynx CA's had career expectations to fly 175's and Q-400's, respectively. The most junior FO @ Midwest or Frontier had career expectations to fly nothing smaller than a 717 or A-318 (and it can be generally assumed that, career wise, every guy @ Midwest or Frontier was a mid-level CA @ a regional prior to going to Midwest or Frontier). The above post recognized that RAH and Lynx CA's would have first dibs on Airbus and 190 CA seats as being an issue, and I just wanted to identify the reasoning under Allegheny Mohawk that is applicable.

The solution? Hard to say. Maybe go with the above proposed integration, but offer super seniority (ahead of any RAH or Lynx CA) to the former YX and F9 FO's for the purposes of bidding the left seat of aircraft larger than an E-175 only. RAH FO's expected to get the chance to bid to a large fleet of E-175 and smaller jets as most of the RAH CA's left for bigger and better airlines, and shouldn't watch as their upgrade goes to a YX or F9 FO who expected to sit in the right seat for at least 5-7 years minimum waiting for a left seat. So, make the F9 and YX FO's wait it out for the left seat of any jet (can't go to the left seat of any jet until an opening in the left seat of a EMB-175+ aircraft opens up), while the RAH and Lynx FO's don't have to wait it out, but won't be able to bid into large aircraft they never expected to see on property either. The RAH and Lynx CA's then get to either sit in the seat they're in now (all they expected to get prior to the merger), or they can go to the right seat (or even the left seat) of something larger than a 175 only if the YX and F9 FO's pass up on the opportunity first, preferring to go to the smaller equipment (E-175 and below) for whatever reason. Ultimately, the guys who benefit most are the young RAH and Lynx CA's who, if they stay and RAH/F9/YX sustains itself, will end up as the senior pilots in the company as the older YX and F9 CA's retire, never having to suffer going back to the bottom of the list as an FO at the 'bigger and better' company - be a line holding CA on the E-175 waiting for the left seat of the Airbus instead of sitting reserve as an FO on the Airbus. Of course, if you stay, the whole company could go under too. With risk comes reward. I guess everyone but the RAH guys benefit/lose some too, as they didn't expect to get access to all the bases and opportunities of this new firm, but didn't expect to potentially be based anywhere but DEN or MKE (is this a gain or a loss, depends on whether you went to your firm primarily for the base, which many did. If so, welcome to the integration party, hope you enjoy the left seat of an RJ in Indy!).

Anyway, this all makes sense to me, and seems to preserve the good start that 'Rightseat Ballast' made, while protecting the career expectations of everyone a bit better. I'm sure I screwed it up somewhere (base protection issues, for starters), so, please, feel free to improve upon it (or throw it out completely) - on an internet forum, I would expect nothing less.

In my dreams, this thread actually yields something positive and the arbitrator or union folks actually take it seriously.


Your addition to "rightseat ballast" make alot of sense, but I think this thing still go to arbitration. Arbitration will wash the hands of the union leadership so they can't be blamed for making a bad deal.
MD80 is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 06:16 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by frankwasright View Post
Try doing this and it will be "Nic 2010-The Sequel".How much did all that experience buy the TWA guys at AA ? Hmmm ?
And is exactly the origin of the McCaskell-Bond amendment. This will be it's first real test involving pilots.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 06:25 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

One thought about career expectations...

If Republic would go bankrupt what are your career expectations to get a new job?

---2 year FO at Republic vs. a Capt at Midwest or Frontier?

---7 year FO at Midwest vs. a Capt at Republic or Frontier?

---15 year Capt at Frontier vs. a Capt at Republic or Frontier?

Think about it, where can you get an interview? This thought should be given to the arbitrator to help rule on career expectation.
MD80 is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 06:45 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Dirty Rat View Post
I don't want to hear that attitude from you when you are cranking my gear. The YX and F9 pilots do deserve higher. Why? None of us asked to work for your company. You bought us, you bought our experience and seniority. Deal with it Son.
Bwahah ! Dream on ! I'm in the upper 10%,so you may be snatching MY gear,SON ! You didn't ask to work here-ok,so resign your seniority and move on.
frankwasright is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 06:53 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast View Post
Well, if you actually slow down and read my post, you will see that in no way did my theoretical proposal put all YX and F9 pilots at the top of the list, nor would all be entitled to captain spots. And as for Stockholm syndrome, that entails sympathizing with your captor/oppressor, and YX and F9 are in no way captors in this whole mess. Fairness requires empathy to some degree, and I am not apologetic for that.
Actually,you did-right here:

"That is how the top of the list would look. Mostly Midwest and Frontier guys at the top, with the eldest RAH lifers speckled in. In general though, RAH and Lynx captains would be beneath Midwest and frontier captains. "

Unacceptable.No way,no how.YX was within days of shutting down,so THAT was your "career expectations"-unemployment.To do otherwise is a "windfall" for YX pilots and we will not have it.Frontier,not so much,but they WERE in bankruptcy.I'm well aware of "Stockholm Syndrome"-YX pilots bash your pilot group daily and you say "Oh,please Mr. YX pilot,have my seniority,you deserve it ! I'm just a po' lil' regional pylette !" Bull !
frankwasright is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 06:58 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Default

a little reality check - BB will also be submitting his take on this and an arbitrator will try to plz him as well. it is no secret that he feels none of the midwest guys have a place at the table and that he would like to keep f9 separate. it could go down this way - it appears from the posters general attitude that they have concluded that the unions are in control here. the arb could ignore rah contract for integration and leave everything as it is with one surgical incision.
mwa1 is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 07:08 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HawkerJet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by frankwasright View Post
Bwahah ! Dream on ! I'm in the upper 10%,so you may be snatching MY gear,SON ! You didn't ask to work here-ok,so resign your seniority and move on.
Upper 10%, so why haven't you moved on?
HawkerJet is offline  
Old 01-13-2010, 07:42 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by frankwasright View Post
Actually,you did-right here:

"That is how the top of the list would look. Mostly Midwest and Frontier guys at the top, with the eldest RAH lifers speckled in. In general though, RAH and Lynx captains would be beneath Midwest and frontier captains. "

Unacceptable.No way,no how.YX was within days of shutting down,so THAT was your "career expectations"-unemployment.To do otherwise is a "windfall" for YX pilots and we will not have it.Frontier,not so much,but they WERE in bankruptcy.I'm well aware of "Stockholm Syndrome"-YX pilots bash your pilot group daily and you say "Oh,please Mr. YX pilot,have my seniority,you deserve it ! I'm just a po' lil' regional pylette !" Bull !

Do you thing AirTran would have paid 31 million for the Midwests 717 leases, Midwests gates, Midwests slots, Midwests hanger, Midwests customer loyality, Midwests 156% RASM premium over AirTran (by BB), Midwests Delta code share and the over 20 million (by your CFO) in spares parts?

You guys are so misinformed.

The truth is the Midwest/Republic deal was about cheap labor and rev. BB wanting to have a option when the majors lower departure fees and dump 50 RJs.

Last edited by MD80; 01-13-2010 at 07:57 AM.
MD80 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bcrosier
Regional
13
08-11-2009 08:44 PM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
buffmike80
Major
117
07-14-2009 01:12 PM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-26-2009 11:47 PM
av8tordude
Regional
2
09-03-2008 05:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices