![]() |
Originally Posted by XForces
(Post 867751)
For those of you that have spent time on reserve at Eagle, I was wondering about the two hour call out.
How often do you get the call with only two hours to show? Do you more often know ahead of time that a call might be coming your way, or will scheduling sometime call you for a trip well in advance of the actual trip time (i.e. greater then two hours)? 2.Yes 3.Sometimes. |
i heard Eagle just started ramping up hiring to 40-60 per month, wonder if the newly proposed fatigue rules have anything to do with it. just speculating
|
Originally Posted by bluefrog
(Post 867789)
i heard Eagle just started ramping up hiring to 40-60 per month, wonder if the newly proposed fatigue rules have anything to do with it. just speculating
|
Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
(Post 867797)
When I interviewed they said that part of the reason they were hiring was because of the new fatigue rules, which are going to have an effect on staffing levels.
Thanks for the confirmation, i was hoping for expasion plans or new a/c (dreaming) but this makes more sense. |
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 867655)
Unlimited thanks to the former TWA and AA dudes I flew with that encouraged me to bail when I did. I really liked Eagle, the crews, the equipment and the bases... But Holy Cow 7 years was a long time to wait for the end of a contract and the unknown abyssal of negotiation. Not sure life is greener at any regional, however very grateful for the quality training that Eagle provided. I was never forced to fly a POS and never once saw a crews judgement questioned.
|
Lack of career growth can really begin to weigh on you after a couple of years. I would bet that if the company allowed movement to another airframe, the long upgrade would be a little easier to handle. Another thing they could do is provide a PIC type out of initial training. That would allow some career growth despite the long upgrade time.
|
the key words "for a regional" come to fore. lots of crap 'cuz it's only a regional. knew one guy celebrating his 10th anniversary at an exclusive restaurant - crew schedule calls (not reserve) and he answers. I know stupid thing to do but as an IOE ck airman he thinks it's OK. Long story short, no excuses you are being jm'd.
as far as the new FTDT - these will be in the form of an NPRM unless Congress enacts legislation bypassing the normal 1yr comment period. Even then there is a period of time for transition. The 1500 hr rule gets a 3 yr from date of enactment to compliance period. |
Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
(Post 868022)
Lack of career growth can really begin to weigh on you after a couple of years. I would bet that if the company allowed movement to another airframe, the long upgrade would be a little easier to handle. Another thing they could do is provide a PIC type out of initial training. That would allow some career growth despite the long upgrade time.
|
Originally Posted by mwa1
(Post 868043)
Dirty little secret, half the list are FO's. Worse yet, time to CA numbers are bogus. Upgrades occur when the upper half leaves or if growth occurs - good luck with that happening. Worse yet, if the airline shrinks the bottom of the CA half gets to be the top of the FO half again - which is more likely the case at AE if the 135's are mothballed.
|
It is true that there are quite a few Captains at the top who are not going anywhere until they can't pass their medical or retire, which is an unknown percentage of approximately 600 pilots, if I remember the numbers correctly. This does mean that the remaining 800 Captains would have to move on relatively quickly (assuming no growth) for most of the FO's to have a shot at moving on. If, however, a PIC type rating was attainable out of initial training, it would help some pilots move on earlier as they could LOG PIC time anytime they were the Sole Manipulator of the flight controls, even though they aren't Acting as PIC. This logged PIC time would open doors up for some mid seniority pilots to move on sooner, which would result in movement for most of the FO's, and could actually result in a lower overall operating cost since the average FO salary would go down with the average FO seniority. Just a thought.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands