Eagle Life
#5181
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: CA
Well they are getting old....could predict the same for many 15 to 20 year old equipment? Sure they will be gone, like the shorts, saab, metro liner, Jetstream......the key is what replaces them. The former were replaced by 300 regional jets. That era is ending, albeit at a slow pace. I heard all airplanes will be gone in a 100 years.....just saying.
#5182
Partly because its not the hours its the cycles.... But I dont know where they compare as far as that is concerned....
#5184
New Hire
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: CA
My observation is that the erj is/was a quick turbo prop conversion designed for a relatively short life span. At one point I recall a 20000 hour airframe limit. This has gone up as it has performed somewhat better and longer than designed. I don't think Embraer had two to three hour stage lengths in mind 12 years ago. That has saved a ton of cycles on the airframe. They still seem tired to me. The reliability of the older half of the fleet seems less to me. Twenty years for an airliner is a long time. Twenty years on a regional airliner is a very long time. Life limited parts, finishing parts, dispatch reliability all figure into operating costs. I dont claim to be an airline economist, but I surmise that at one point the cost of operating an older airframe crosses the line into a need to acquire new equipment due to pure economics. Eagle launched EMB 600 and 601 in May of 1998 in ORD, (I had a piece of cake and punch, there was some balloons too!) I believe both are back from TSA sabbatical putting them at 14 years this May. Time flies. I keep my opinion they are old. Albeit, some older then others.
Last edited by imlars; 01-24-2012 at 06:47 AM.
#5185
My observation is that the erj is/was a quick turbo prop conversion designed for a relatively short life span. At one point I recall a 20000 hour airframe limit. This has gone up as it has performed somewhat better and longer than designed. I don't think Embraer had two to three hour stage lengths in mind 12 years ago. That has saved a ton of cycles on the airframe. They still seem tired to me. The reliability of the older half of the fleet seems less to me. Twenty years for an airliner is a long time. Twenty years on a regional airliner is a very long time. Life limited parts, finishing parts, dispatch reliability all figure into operating costs. I dont claim to be an airline economist, but I surmise that at one point the cost of operating an older airframe crosses the line into a need to acquire new equipment due to pure economics. Eagle launched EMB 600 and 601 in May of 1998 in ORD, (I had a piece of cake and punch, there was some balloons too!) I believe both are back from TSA sabbatical putting them at 14 years this May. Time flies. I keep my opinion they are old. Albeit, some older then others.
#5186
Well they are getting old....could predict the same for many 15 to 20 year old equipment? Sure they will be gone, like the shorts, saab, metro liner, Jetstream......the key is what replaces them. The former were replaced by 300 regional jets. That era is ending, albeit at a slow pace. I heard all airplanes will be gone in a 100 years.....just saying.
#5187
The preliminary Vacancy/Displacement bid has the most junior Captain in SJU with a hire date of Dec 06, a 5 year upgrade (for the time being)!
#5188
Sounds like someone has been playing "lets swallow the stuff under the sink".... Real reliable source...
#5190
Sorry, maybe you didn't get the sarcasm in my post. The point was I see a lot of these "A check airman told me" or "A mx sup. said..." or "Danny the head scrub is of the opinion that..." and people should be cautious about rumors.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



