Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
MEC Summary of Nicolau Remedy [edit:AmEagle] >

MEC Summary of Nicolau Remedy [edit:AmEagle]

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

MEC Summary of Nicolau Remedy [edit:AmEagle]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2010, 04:45 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bailee atr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: ATR72
Posts: 208
Default

Im just happy the whole letter 3 nightmare is over. Untill the next grievance is filed!!!!
bailee atr is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 04:57 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by bailee atr View Post
Im just happy the whole letter 3 nightmare is over. Untill the next grievance is filed!!!!
Woo-Hoo! Agreed! While it's possible another minor L3 grievance can be filed, I think Nicolau was pretty clear about the resolution to this matter. Any questions we have will be clarified, but my understanding is all the parties thoroughly understood what the arbitration means. This isn't a contract negotiation or a mutual agreement, it's an arbitration resolution. There is no debate. There is no decision to be made about whether to accept it, ratify it or otherwise decide if it is a good enough document to agree upon. It's a decree. All parties have to accept it. That's what binding arbitration means. It's only idiots like USAPA who don't understand that concept.
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 06:20 AM
  #13  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot View Post
Woo-Hoo! Agreed! While it's possible another minor L3 grievance can be filed, I think Nicolau was pretty clear about the resolution to this matter. Any questions we have will be clarified, but my understanding is all the parties thoroughly understood what the arbitration means. This isn't a contract negotiation or a mutual agreement, it's an arbitration resolution. There is no debate. There is no decision to be made about whether to accept it, ratify it or otherwise decide if it is a good enough document to agree upon. It's a decree. All parties have to accept it. That's what binding arbitration means. It's only idiots like USAPA who don't understand that concept.
I agree, but dont you think there will be some gray areas in the ruling regarding the implementation procedures?
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 07:02 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
I agree, but dont you think there will be some gray areas in the ruling regarding the implementation procedures?
Not many because most questions are asked off the bat. Like our contract, there's a ton of background information shared between all the parties clarifying what all the points mean which is not explicitly spelled out in the final document. Unlike our contract, this isn't a negotiated agreement; it's an arbitrated judgment. No party will be able to later say "That's not what I meant when I agreed to it".

I'm certain all questions by members will be answered quickly and within a few weeks because our union reps already knows 99.999% of them.
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 07:44 AM
  #15  
Furlough line holder
 
andy171773's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ2, ATR, CRJ7, E145, 737
Posts: 1,845
Default

This sounds like a phenomenal deal for the flow through guys, considering what could've transpired. Does this mean Eagle is going to open the flood gates and hire a ton more?
andy171773 is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:11 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by andy171773 View Post
This sounds like a phenomenal deal for the flow through guys, considering what could've transpired. Does this mean Eagle is going to open the flood gates and hire a ton more?
Unfortunately not. Despite the panic attack presently taking place over at the APA Puzzle Palace there won't be massive hoards of lowly regional pilots slipping into the cockpits of the World's Greatest Pilots any time soon. After the 35 pilots go in June, the rest of the first 244 have to wait for AA to begin recalling pilots. That will probably be at least anther year. After the 244, the remainder have to wait until all AA and former TWA pilots have been offered recall. This will probably take about five years given it would follow the consequences a new AA-APA contract.

In short, don't count on any hiring at Eagle except to account for the new CRJ's and attrition as the economy improves.
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 10:52 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Default

basically recall in seniority order that was the original ae position.
mwa1 is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 12:34 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot View Post
ROFLMAO. Always fun to see another APA sock puppet spewing hate for Eagle pilots. What puzzles me is why the "World's Greatest Pilots" never have the yams to just stick to only one user name. Anyone know the answer? Is it because they have free internet in their hotel rooms?
Sorry- Ex TWA, never APA. Only user name I have/ever had ALPA SAFETY was already taken!!

Tell me more about that deserving stuff!

Me thinks the furloughed AA guys deserved to keep the left seat in the rj's.
SkyHighHobo is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 04:31 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Beagle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: EMB-145
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHighHobo View Post
Sorry- Ex TWA, never APA. Only user name I have/ever had ALPA SAFETY was already taken!!

Tell me more about that deserving stuff!
Obviously you're just trolling and wouldn't want to understand although I'm sure you are capable of it. Have a nice life, Hobo. Hopefully you'll find something more rewarding than trolling in things which don't affect you and never have.
Beagle Pilot is offline  
Old 04-12-2010, 05:05 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 43
Default

Some things for the 244 flows to consider. You will not be able to choose your equipment and base. Most of the 28 Feb furloughed pilots were S80 f/os in STL, so that might require the first 35 pilots. You will profer based on what AA shows available. The chance of DFW and ORD is zero. Most likely LGA, MIA and STL. There is a possiblilty of the 767, S80 in LGA, 767 and 737 in MIA and the S80 in STL. In STL all non TWA pilots bid behind the TWA pilots for a monthly schedule. You will be on reserve in STL for a long time. Reserve guarantee is 73 hrs. Some pilots are flown over guar, but nothing over 85 hrs is allowed. You have little control of how much you fly because AA tries to keep all reserve pilots equal in time. STL has only limited nonstops, making a fun 2 leg commute for many.

I am happy nobody is forced into doing something they don't want to. Now can you AE pilots do what is right and allow any flowbacks still at AE, to fly Captain?

Last edited by lsl80; 04-12-2010 at 07:08 AM.
lsl80 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
PEACH
Major
14
11-07-2009 08:20 AM
captexpress
Cargo
7
11-04-2008 03:43 AM
DAL4EVER
Mergers and Acquisitions
12
10-18-2008 01:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices