Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lynx killed off part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2010, 12:21 PM
  #71  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by HawkerJet View Post
"Proudly Chemtrailing the United States since 2007"

2007 huh, what were you doing before that? A previous post pointed out that our most senior pilots already had a fair amount of prior 121 (and 135) experience.

What will be decided is an unknown but it would not be an injustice if some of the Lynx pilots who choose to go Republic end up in front of you (career expectations). Before you get to upset by my statement remember we are a very small group (125) so it would not be that many, and the likelihood of a fair and equitable integration for the Lynx pilots, glass half empty time, is low.
I was a CFI and corp pilot. I would never get upset over something like this (I know who's decision it is). What happens happens and I won't be surprised at all if they do.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 04-27-2010, 12:56 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 522
Default

Originally Posted by dolsanddays View Post
I'm sure you like this idea... You overlook the fact that RAH was involved in the parking of Q's and 717's. This happens while your E-Jet fleet has been growing. Neither the Midwest nor Lynx route structures have gone away. They have been taken over and operated under the Republic system. In addition, this all is happening while other parts of the RAH system are retracting. Already the RAH pilots have achieved a Windfall. They are upgrading and expanding at the expense of other pilot groups. This is why their union doesn't make public statements about the screw job their management performed on the pilots of Lynx of Midwest. The IBT aid and abed the management of RAH in removing pilots and aircraft from the properties and in return they get upgrades and growth. However, I wouldn't expect anything less from a group that has been so taken advantage of by their own management time and time again. RAH pilots complain about how they badly they are treated by their management. Hey Captain Pot meet FO Kettle...
+1 Spot on.
likeitis is offline  
Old 04-27-2010, 05:28 PM
  #73  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by enuff View Post
Don't worry we are in the process of taking it back.
Too late, the industry is already screwed because it was given up. You stated earlier that you are at such a great carrier with rigs and good pay but that means nothing because your scope language is worse than RAH's. RAH pilots are in the process of getting their pay and QOL upgraded in a new contract, so how is it that they don't get the chance to fix a sub par contract but you are justified by saying "don't worry we are in the process of taking it back" referring to your sh$t scope. RAH was a stepping stone like every other regional when their last contract was made and it does suck but so does yours wherever you work because you have allowed your company to farm out so much of your flying so you could make an extra couple of bucks. There would be no RAH if it wasn't for mainline pukes like you who gave up scope for a couple of extra bucks and now you realize your mistake but you blame it on young regional pilots who have no place else to go.
Your greed is the problem, so good luck taking back your scope, I hope for all of us that you succeed, but you sound pretty stupid so I'm not holding my breath.
crazy pills is offline  
Old 04-27-2010, 06:05 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
HawkerJet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by dashtrash300 View Post
Has a schedule been posted as to when furloughs will occur? When is the next round and how many will be affected?
Are you asking about Lynx?

Early April approx 40, mid April approx 40, early May small # with 40ish remaining. This is off the top of my head give or take a few ya know.

Good news is Lynx pilots are still picking up work outside of this mess.
HawkerJet is offline  
Old 04-27-2010, 06:24 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Default

Crazy Pills thank you kindly for saving me the 5 minutes out of my day by writing that one up. Could not have said it better myself!
SUX4U is offline  
Old 04-28-2010, 05:47 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by crazy pills View Post
Too late, the industry is already screwed because it was given up. You stated earlier that you are at such a great carrier with rigs and good pay but that means nothing because your scope language is worse than RAH's. RAH pilots are in the process of getting their pay and QOL upgraded in a new contract, so how is it that they don't get the chance to fix a sub par contract but you are justified by saying "don't worry we are in the process of taking it back" referring to your sh$t scope. RAH was a stepping stone like every other regional when their last contract was made and it does suck but so does yours wherever you work because you have allowed your company to farm out so much of your flying so you could make an extra couple of bucks. There would be no RAH if it wasn't for mainline pukes like you who gave up scope for a couple of extra bucks and now you realize your mistake but you blame it on young regional pilots who have no place else to go.
Your greed is the problem, so good luck taking back your scope, I hope for all of us that you succeed, but you sound pretty stupid so I'm not holding my breath.
While your statement is correct it only covers half the problem. A lot of scope was taken away from major pilots during chapter 11.

Regional pilots have a ton of blood on their hands as well. There is this funny theory called market economics that drives the value of all commodities including labor. You chose to value your labor at such a low wages and thus make it more tempting to airline management. If you and other regional pilots had said no, then the wages would have come up until sufficient pilots were found who would work at decent wages. Or better yet it would have been uneconomical to farm it out and it would have stayed at mainline.

Your desire to use RAH as a "stepping stone" and not care what you get paid is a big part of the problem.

Some pilots were indifferent, some were greedy, and some were ignorant. It doesn't change the fact that everyone had a hand in making it what it is today.
PSACFI is offline  
Old 04-28-2010, 07:09 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by RAHPilot5 View Post
Jealousy is the root of all evil.
Truer words were never spoken.
FAULTPUSH is offline  
Old 04-28-2010, 07:23 AM
  #78  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by crazy pills View Post
Too late, the industry is already screwed because it was given up. You stated earlier that you are at such a great carrier with rigs and good pay but that means nothing because your scope language is worse than RAH's. RAH pilots are in the process of getting their pay and QOL upgraded in a new contract, so how is it that they don't get the chance to fix a sub par contract but you are justified by saying "don't worry we are in the process of taking it back" referring to your sh$t scope. RAH was a stepping stone like every other regional when their last contract was made and it does suck but so does yours wherever you work because you have allowed your company to farm out so much of your flying so you could make an extra couple of bucks. There would be no RAH if it wasn't for mainline pukes like you who gave up scope for a couple of extra bucks and now you realize your mistake but you blame it on young regional pilots who have no place else to go.


Your greed is the problem, so good luck taking back your scope, I hope for all of us that you succeed, but you sound pretty stupid so I'm not holding my breath.

Well we may have been stupid in giving up that flying but look who is doing it for alot less, with an absolute garbage contract....... now who is the stupid one? You guys gave your own store away to fly that big shiny jet. Your contract did not even have industry standard RJ rates which were already the norm. By the way you can say you are negotiating a great contract....blah blah blah. Until the ink is dry on it you are still the joke of the industry. I'm not surprised you don't pay Bedford for the priveledge to fly your big jets.
enuff is offline  
Old 04-28-2010, 10:24 AM
  #79  
Tuberriffic
 
thepotato232's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Hopefully the bunk
Posts: 222
Default

Actually enuff, you'll find that the RAH RJ rates were well within "Industry Standard" when they were negotiated. Sadly enough, they still are just about "Standard". Look around at the RJ payscales for 50-seaters and 76-seaters - you'll find that RAH's rates are (distressingly) well within the normal range. Among the many failures of the current contract were that it didn't differentiate between types - only on number of seats, and the pay scale topped out with an "## and up". The idea that RAH got where they are because their pilots underbid everyone else to get the company moving is fiction. Republic still operates on a crappy-but-middle-of-the-road regional contract. They got where they are because mainline kept throwing money at a management team with megalomanical tendencies because it saved them cash in the short term.

Each side in this discussion can throw the "Gave Away Your Store for Shiny Jets" argument - I still remember that bull**** from over at UAL when management flat-out to the pilot group that they could bring the RJs on property, but that would mean fewer big, shiny 777s. We all know how that turned out. Everybody's living in a glass house.
thepotato232 is offline  
Old 04-28-2010, 10:41 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by dolsanddays View Post
I'm sure you like this idea... You overlook the fact that RAH was involved in the parking of Q's and 717's. This happens while your E-Jet fleet has been growing. Neither the Midwest nor Lynx route structures have gone away. They have been taken over and operated under the Republic system. In addition, this all is happening while other parts of the RAH system are retracting. Already the RAH pilots have achieved a Windfall. They are upgrading and expanding at the expense of other pilot groups. This is why their union doesn't make public statements about the screw job their management performed on the pilots of Lynx or Midwest. The IBT aid and abed the management of RAH in removing pilots and aircraft from the properties and in return they get upgrades and growth. However, I wouldn't expect anything less from a group that has been so taken advantage of by their own management time and time again. RAH pilots complain about how they badly they are treated by their management. Hey Captain Pot meet FO Kettle...

+1 ..... Have to agree with you.

Republic EXCO worked with BB to "lock-out" the pilots getting industry average wages/work rules/benefits to replace them with industry low wages/work rules/benefits.

Remove the corruption. Vote FAPA.
MD80 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM
n9810f
Regional
106
02-06-2010 08:03 AM
SrfNFly227
Regional
179
10-16-2009 10:12 PM
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
11
01-20-2009 05:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices