Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Sli At Republic/frontier >

Sli At Republic/frontier

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Sli At Republic/frontier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2010 | 01:06 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 1
From: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy23
If I understand it correctly, what FAPA is trying to do actually makes sense for them. Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but they are not trying to remain permanently seperate, rather delay the SLI implementation until the end of the LOA they signed upon the purchase of Frontier. I believe this agreement is good until 2015. This gives them a windfall when (if) the C-series ever comes along. If its a replacement aircraft, it will have to go on the F9 cert (according to the LOA) and the frontier pilots will fill every seat. If they are growth aircraft, it will ensure that nearly every F9 pilot will upgrade before any Republic/midwest/lynx pilot get a shot at that seat. If the sli is implemented before those aircraft come on board, it will be a vacancy bid and anyone with enough seniority can hold it. I would expect FAPA to look out for their own and at least to me, that is what is occuring here.

I haven't seen anything that suggests FAPA wants to remain permanently seperate, just a delay. While I do not think this will be possible, as the LOA violates the Republic scope, I understand why they'd try. The major downfall
to this is that the midwest and lynx pilots would not be integrated until the expiration of the frontier LOA if the arbitrator rules in favor of FAPA.

The final ruling from the arbitrator just got a lot more complicated. Will be very interesting.
Exactly. Read this Airdale.
Reply
Old 05-28-2010 | 04:45 PM
  #42  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Makes perfect sense...


...and they might as well change their call sign to "Whipsaw."
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 06:03 AM
  #43  
Airdale's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by thevagabond
Exactly. Read this Airdale.
Originally Posted by flyguy23
If I understand it correctly, what FAPA is trying to do actually makes sense for them. Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but they are not trying to remain permanently seperate, rather delay the SLI implementation until the end of the LOA they signed upon the purchase of Frontier. I believe this agreement is good until 2015. This gives them a windfall when (if) the C-series ever comes along. If its a replacement aircraft, it will have to go on the F9 cert (according to the LOA) and the frontier pilots will fill every seat. If they are growth aircraft, it will ensure that nearly every F9 pilot will upgrade before any Republic/midwest/lynx pilot get a shot at that seat. If the sli is implemented before those aircraft come on board, it will be a vacancy bid and anyone with enough seniority can hold it. I would expect FAPA to look out for their own and at least to me, that is what is occuring here.

I haven't seen anything that suggests FAPA wants to remain permanently seperate, just a delay. While I do not think this will be possible, as the LOA violates the Republic scope, I understand why they'd try. The major downfall to this is that the midwest and lynx pilots would not be integrated until the expiration of the frontier LOA if the arbitrator rules in favor of FAPA.

The final ruling from the arbitrator just got a lot more complicated. Will be very interesting.
Originally Posted by planediveguy
You are assuming the C-Series will be placed on the F9 Certificate... whithout SLI you can count on those planes being placed on the Republic Certificate and the F9 guys getting whipsawed to shreds...
Originally Posted by airbill
Makes perfect sense...


...and they might as well change their call sign to "Whipsaw."

The only think I ask, is that when Republic pilots are forced to take over routes at Frontier, that not a single person labels us a SCAB for taking THER JOBS. When every last Frontier pilot is on the street because they were outsource by our cheap "Regional" labor, I will not be labeled a scab. Ya'll have your chance.

In the words of my little neice - OMFG I'm not doing this anymore.
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 07:36 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Furlough/Gun Driver
Default

Originally Posted by Airdale
The only think I ask, is that when Republic pilots are forced to take over routes at Frontier, that not a single person labels us a SCAB for taking THER JOBS. When every last Frontier pilot is on the street because they were outsource by our cheap "Regional" labor, I will not be labeled a scab. Ya'll have your chance.

As far as I'm concerned Republic already did this once to Midwest, whats the difference in how you are viewed now as opposed to after Republic finishes gutting Frontier.
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 07:37 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 37
Default

If the arbitrator chooses to honor the Frontier LOA, then the C-series will go on the F9 certificate. There is almost no chance of this happening though. Its a last ditch effort by FAPA to come out on top in this thing. The arbitrator COULD delay implementation until a common contract is ratified. If thats the case, 2015 may be aiming high. The company will drag their feet for 10 years on a new contract if they're able.

A side note: The republic contract would REQUIRE the C-series or any new aircraft be flown by those on the chq seniority list. The F9 LOA would require those planes be flown by F9 due to the weight. Its just a fact that this will turn into a big mess and we'll all lose in the end.
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 09:11 AM
  #46  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy23
If the arbitrator chooses to honor the Frontier LOA, then the C-series will go on the F9 certificate. There is almost no chance of this happening though. Its a last ditch effort by FAPA to come out on top in this thing. The arbitrator COULD delay implementation until a common contract is ratified. If thats the case, 2015 may be aiming high. The company will drag their feet for 10 years on a new contract if they're able.
Sssh. Listen. Can you hear it?

Strike... Strike... Strike...

One list. Now.
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 09:19 AM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 37
Default

I'd be willing to walk out tomorrow based on this companies actions. A huge majority of those at RAH would join me. The problem is going to be getting our release to self help. Wouldn't surprise me a bit if the NMB deems us too big and never releases us. The company is well aware of this.
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 09:34 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: ERJ FO
Default

Listen kids...I don't think anyone is going to get excited about this whole SLI process. Us RAH folks think it's gone on long enough, FAPA obviously sees something they don't like, and management is probably laughing all the way to the bank. The simple fact of the matter is you don't invade Russia in the winter and you don't fight a war on 2 fronts. Valuable resources are being used aruging amongst ourselves when RAH should be using them on a new contract. A contract that we should be getting the assistance from our more experienced FAPA coworkers but aren't...cuz they don't want anything to do with us.

The simple fact of the matter is that 2 lists working under 2 contracts is only good for the company...not any of the pilot groups. I'm not advocating some hastily thrown-together decision that does not recognize the role F9 pilots have played in keeping their company afloat...but I also think that they are not really recognizing just how untenable their position was before RAH came along.
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 10:17 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: A318/319 pic
Default

Originally Posted by SharkyBN584
Listen kids...I don't think anyone is going to get excited about this whole SLI process. Us RAH folks think it's gone on long enough, FAPA obviously sees something they don't like, and management is probably laughing all the way to the bank. The simple fact of the matter is you don't invade Russia in the winter and you don't fight a war on 2 fronts. Valuable resources are being used aruging amongst ourselves when RAH should be using them on a new contract. A contract that we should be getting the assistance from our more experienced FAPA coworkers but aren't...cuz they don't want anything to do with us.

The simple fact of the matter is that 2 lists working under 2 contracts is only good for the company...not any of the pilot groups. I'm not advocating some hastily thrown-together decision that does not recognize the role F9 pilots have played in keeping their company afloat...but I also think that they are not really recognizing just how untenable their position was before RAH came along.

Nice spin. So your saying that FAPA has sided with RAH management because they just won't do whatever the IBT wants. Here I thought the problem was the IBT was to cozy with RAH management.

Last edited by FLEX; 05-29-2010 at 01:25 PM.
Reply
Old 05-29-2010 | 11:48 AM
  #50  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FLEX
Nice spin. So your saying that FAPA has sided with RAH management because they just won't do whatever the IBT wants. Here I thought the problem was the IBT was to cozy with RAH management.
You guys gave the lie to that statement when you signed away everything in that abortion of an LOA.

As someone said above, we should be unified right now, not divided. Otherwise, all that effort you guys are making is merely pulling hard on your side of the whipsaw. Your choice.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Myboyblue
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
04-29-2010 07:39 AM
caddis
Mergers and Acquisitions
85
12-08-2008 07:26 PM
tonyviv
Mergers and Acquisitions
18
12-04-2008 04:55 PM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
119
10-27-2008 12:02 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
10-25-2008 07:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices